GPU Comparison

NVIDIA
GEFORCE

NVIDIA RTX A400

CORE STATE GA107
VRAM 4 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1762 MHz
TDP 50 W
BUS WIDTH 64 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ampere
nm
PROCESS 8 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

T400

CORE STATE TU117
VRAM 2 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1425 MHz
TDP 30 W
BUS WIDTH 64 bit
ARCHITECTURE Turing
nm
PROCESS 12 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2021

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl
22,844
17,039
geekbench_vulkan
22,237
15,976
passmark_directx_10
32
N/A
passmark_directx_11
37
N/A
passmark_directx_12
27
N/A
passmark_directx_9
87
N/A
passmark_g2d
899
N/A
passmark_g3d
5,983
N/A
passmark_gpu_compute
2,557
N/A

Analysis: NVIDIA RTX A400 vs NVIDIA T400

For this graphics card matchup, NVIDIA's NVIDIA RTX A400 graphics shows its advantage obviously. If you're creating content at 4K, NVIDIA's NVIDIA RTX A400 graphics consistently surpasses NVIDIA T400 (NVIDIA) by significant amounts. This speed margin widens especially wider at higher resolutions. This GPU executes intensive workloads with efficiency. The design improvements are evident.

Game performance tests over different games steadily support NVIDIA's NVIDIA RTX A400 graphics. Whether it's multiplayer games to blockbuster productions, NVIDIA's NVIDIA RTX A400 graphics maintains its lead. This gaming dependability throughout diverse games demonstrates core technical superiority. Enthusiasts might count on capable results irrespective of scenario. The capability is notable.

Playing games performance over various resolutions steadily benefit NVIDIA's NVIDIA RTX A400 graphics. From esports scenarios to heavy titles, NVIDIA's NVIDIA RTX A400 graphics holds its advantage. This gaming dependability across different titles demonstrates inherent design advantages. Gamers will rely on excellent experiences irrespective of scenario. This versatility is impressive.

NVIDIA T400 (NVIDIA) isn't overlooked entirely, though the gaming gap relative to NVIDIA's NVIDIA RTX A400 graphics is challenging to dismiss. For cost-sensitive users, NVIDIA T400 (NVIDIA) might yet make sense assuming the reduced asking price makes up for its diminished power. That said, when maximum graphics power, NVIDIA's NVIDIA RTX A400 graphics stands as the undisputed champion. This conclusion is evident. Power enthusiasts would lean toward NVIDIA's NVIDIA RTX A400 graphics.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
RTX A400
T400
Core Specs
Shading Units
768
384 -50.0%
Shaders
768
384 -50.0%
TMUs
24
24 0.0%
ROPs
16
16 0.0%
SM Count
6
6 0.0%
Clocks
Base Clock
1417 MHz
420 MHz
Boost Clock
1762 MHz
1425 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz 12 Gbps effective
1250 MHz 10 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
4 GB
2 GB
VRAM (MB)
4,096
2,048 -50.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
64 bit
64 bit
Bandwidth
96.00 GB/s
80.00 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
2 MB
1024 KB
Performance
Pixel Rate
28.19 GPixel/s
22.80 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
42.29 GTexel/s
34.20 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
2.706 TFLOPS
1,094.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
42.29 GFLOPS (1:64)
34.20 GFLOPS (1:32)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
2.706 TFLOPS (1:1)
2.189 TFLOPS (2:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
6
Tensor Cores
24
Power
TDP
50 W
30 W
TDP (W)
50
30 -40.0%
Suggested PSU
250 W
200 W
Power Connectors
None
None
Architecture
Architecture
Ampere
Turing
GPU Name
GA107
TU117
Generation
Workstation Ampere (Ax000)
Quadro Turing (Tx000)
Process Size
8 nm
12 nm
Transistors
8,700 million
4,700 million
Die Size
200 mm²
200 mm²
Foundry
Samsung
TSMC
Density
43.5M / mm²
23.5M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 (12_1)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
8.6
7.5
Shader Model
6.9
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
Single-slot
Single-slot
Length
163 mm 6.4 inches
Height
69 mm 2.7 inches
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 3.0 x16
Other
Production
Active
End-of-life
Predecessor
Quadro Turing
Quadro Volta
Successor
Workstation Ada
Workstation Ampere
View RTX A400 Details View T400 Details