GPU Comparison

AMD

RADEON

AMD Radeon 760M

CORE STATE Phoenix

VRAM System Shared

CLOCK SPEED 2599 MHz

TDP 15 W

BUS WIDTH System Shared

ARCHITECTURE RDNA 3.0

PROCESS 4 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2024

NVIDIA

GEFORCE

T400

CORE STATE TU117

VRAM 2 GB

CLOCK SPEED 1425 MHz

TDP 30 W

BUS WIDTH 64 bit

ARCHITECTURE Turing

PROCESS 12 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2021

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12

400

N/A

geekbench_opencl

20,255

17,039

geekbench_vulkan

30,336

15,976

passmark_directx_10

N/A

passmark_directx_11

N/A

passmark_directx_12

N/A

passmark_directx_9

N/A

passmark_g2d

890

N/A

passmark_g3d

5,310

N/A

passmark_gpu_compute

2,840

N/A

Analysis: AMD Radeon 760M vs NVIDIA T400

If analyzing AMD's AMD Radeon 760M to the NVIDIA NVIDIA T400, a frame rate margin grows immediately visible. AMD's AMD Radeon 760M takes the advantage in virtually all game we executed. This gap is notable sufficiently to affect actual rendering experiences. Users will experience improved visuals. The assessment is clear.

When it comes to ray tracing, AMD's AMD Radeon 760M leaps considerably forward of the NVIDIA NVIDIA T400. The dedicated accelerators handle heavy reflection rendering far more capably. Players wanting cutting-edge effects might definitely pick AMD's AMD Radeon 760M. This ray tracing performance is significant. Contemporary AAA games continually utilize ray tracing technology.

When users making a investment choice, AMD's AMD Radeon 760M appears as the recommended pick. The consistent gaming edge over the NVIDIA NVIDIA T400 renders it the wiser purchase for demanding consumers. Consider your specific workloads, but the data points toward AMD's AMD Radeon 760M. Base an wise selection. This gaming gap is significant and notable.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

760M

T400

Core Specs

Shading Units

512

384 -25.0%

Shaders

512

384 -25.0%

TMUs

24 -25.0%

ROPs

16 0.0%

Compute Units

—

SM Count

—

Clocks

Base Clock

800 MHz

420 MHz

Boost Clock

2599 MHz

1425 MHz

Memory Clock

System Shared

1250 MHz 10 Gbps effective

Memory

Memory Size

System Shared

2 GB

VRAM (MB)

—

2,048

Memory Type

System Shared

GDDR6

Memory Bus

System Shared

64 bit

Bandwidth

System Dependent

80.00 GB/s

Cache

L1 Cache

128 KB per Array

64 KB (per SM)

L2 Cache

2 MB

1024 KB

L0 Cache

32 KB per WGP

—

Performance

Pixel Rate

41.58 GPixel/s

22.80 GPixel/s

Texture Rate

83.17 GTexel/s

34.20 GTexel/s

FP32 (TFLOPS)

5.323 TFLOPS

1,094.4 GFLOPS

FP64 (TFLOPS)

332.7 GFLOPS (1:16)

34.20 GFLOPS (1:32)

FP16 (TFLOPS)

5.323 TFLOPS (1:1)

2.189 TFLOPS (2:1)

AI/RT

RT Cores

—

Power

TDP

15 W

30 W

TDP (W)

30 +100.0%

Suggested PSU

—

200 W

Power Connectors

None

Architecture

RDNA 3.0

Turing

GPU Name

Phoenix

TU117

Generation

Navi III IGP (Phoenix)

Quadro Turing (Tx000)

Process Size

4 nm

12 nm

Transistors

25,390 million

4,700 million

Die Size

178 mm²

200 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Density

142.6M / mm²

23.5M / mm²

API Support

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

12 (12_1)

OpenGL

4.6

Vulkan

1.4

OpenCL

2.1

3.0

CUDA

—

7.5

Shader Model

6.8

Physical

Slot Width

IGP

Single-slot

Outputs

Motherboard Dependent

3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x8

PCIe 3.0 x16

Other

Production

Active

End-of-life

Predecessor

Navi II IGP

Quadro Volta

Successor

—

Workstation Ampere

View Radeon 760M Details View T400 Details

GPU Comparison

AMD Radeon 760M

T400

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

Analysis: AMD Radeon 760M vs NVIDIA T400

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

Related Graphics Cards

Related Comparisons