GPU Comparison

NVIDIA

GEFORCE

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile

CORE STATE GA107

VRAM 4 GB

CLOCK SPEED 1687 MHz

TDP 95 W

BUS WIDTH 128 bit

ARCHITECTURE Ampere

PROCESS 8 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2021

NVIDIA

GEFORCE

T400 4 GB

CORE STATE TU117

VRAM 4 GB

CLOCK SPEED 1425 MHz

TDP 30 W

BUS WIDTH 64 bit

ARCHITECTURE Turing

PROCESS 12 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2021

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl

56,518

17,320

geekbench_vulkan

53,146

16,263

passmark_directx_10

N/A

passmark_directx_11

N/A

passmark_directx_12

N/A

passmark_directx_9

115

N/A

passmark_g2d

491

N/A

passmark_g3d

9,611

N/A

passmark_gpu_compute

4,334

N/A

Analysis: NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA T400 4 GB

The graphics card comparison between Radeon NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile and NVIDIA T400 4 GB demonstrates impressively competitive frame rates. The two GPUs exchange leads across various titles, with neither holding a decisive lead. This benchmark results confirms this conclusion. No card dominates steadily. Those encounter a true dilemma between them.

If frame rates is remarkably comparable, MSRP and features turn the deciding factors. Evaluate hardware RT performance, AI upscaling technology, energy efficiency, and platform quality when choosing between Radeon NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile and NVIDIA T400 4 GB. Such considerations could sway the decision. Think comprehensively. The complete perspective matters.

Ultimately: Radeon NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile and NVIDIA T400 4 GB are evenly matched. None of the deserves a undisputed preference over the competitor. Let cost and software considerations influence your eventual selection. Both options can serve you adequately. It's a win-win choice.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

RTX A2000 Mobile

T400 4 GB

Core Specs

Shading Units

2,560

384 -85.0%

Shaders

2,560

384 -85.0%

TMUs

24 -70.0%

ROPs

16 -66.7%

SM Count

6 -70.0%

Clocks

Base Clock

1215 MHz

420 MHz

Boost Clock

1687 MHz

1425 MHz

Memory Clock

1500 MHz 12 Gbps effective

1250 MHz 10 Gbps effective

Memory

Memory Size

4 GB

VRAM (MB)

4,096

4,096 0.0%

Memory Type

GDDR6

Memory Bus

128 bit

64 bit

Bandwidth

192.0 GB/s

80.00 GB/s

Cache

L1 Cache

128 KB (per SM)

64 KB (per SM)

L2 Cache

2 MB

1024 KB

Performance

Pixel Rate

80.98 GPixel/s

22.80 GPixel/s

Texture Rate

135.0 GTexel/s

34.20 GTexel/s

FP32 (TFLOPS)

8.637 TFLOPS

1,094.4 GFLOPS

FP64 (TFLOPS)

135.0 GFLOPS (1:64)

34.20 GFLOPS (1:32)

FP16 (TFLOPS)

8.637 TFLOPS (1:1)

2.189 TFLOPS (2:1)

AI/RT

RT Cores

—

Tensor Cores

—

Power

TDP

95 W

30 W

TDP (W)

30 -68.4%

Suggested PSU

—

200 W

Power Connectors

None

Architecture

Ampere

Turing

GPU Name

GA107

TU117

Generation

Ampere-MW (Ax000)

Quadro Turing (Tx000)

Process Size

8 nm

12 nm

Transistors

8,700 million

4,700 million

Die Size

200 mm²

Foundry

Samsung

TSMC

Density

43.5M / mm²

23.5M / mm²

API Support

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

12 (12_1)

OpenGL

4.6

Vulkan

1.4

OpenCL

3.0

CUDA

8.6

7.5

Shader Model

6.8

Physical

Slot Width

IGP

Single-slot

Outputs

Portable Device Dependent

3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x16

PCIe 3.0 x16

Other

Production

End-of-life

Predecessor

Quadro Turing-M

Quadro Volta

Successor

Ada-MW

Workstation Ampere

View RTX A2000 Mobile Details View T400 4 GB Details

GPU Comparison

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile

T400 4 GB

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

Analysis: NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA T400 4 GB

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

Related Graphics Cards

Related Comparisons