GPU Comparison

NVIDIA
GEFORCE

NVIDIA RTX A1000

CORE STATE GA107
VRAM 8 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1462 MHz
TDP 50 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ampere
nm
PROCESS 8 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

T1000

CORE STATE TU117
VRAM 4 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1395 MHz
TDP 50 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE Turing
nm
PROCESS 12 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2021

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
969
N/A
geekbench_opencl
52,078
37,704
geekbench_vulkan
49,574
34,874

Analysis: NVIDIA RTX A1000 vs NVIDIA T1000

Visual performance benchmarks between NVIDIA's NVIDIA RTX A1000 graphics and NVIDIA T1000 (NVIDIA) indicate a clear victor. NVIDIA's NVIDIA RTX A1000 graphics delivers considerably superior frame rates over contemporary AAA releases. The video memory benefit and architectural advances result into clearly improved visual results. Test data demonstrates this assessment. Users demanding premium visuals will consider this.

The video memory benefit of NVIDIA's NVIDIA RTX A1000 graphics turns particularly significant at demanding resolutions. High resolution rendering needs significant memory, and NVIDIA's NVIDIA RTX A1000 graphics provides extra headroom. The converts into smoother performance in demanding titles. Next-gen releases can increasingly demand additional video memory. This advantage widens over releases.

In-game results throughout various titles steadily support NVIDIA's NVIDIA RTX A1000 graphics. From competitive games to demanding productions, NVIDIA's NVIDIA RTX A1000 graphics holds its lead. This benchmark consistency throughout various titles indicates inherent architectural improvements. Enthusiasts can anticipate strong frame rates regardless of title. The versatility is outstanding.

All things considered, NVIDIA's NVIDIA RTX A1000 graphics provides the superior pick in this comparison. Its gaming leads warrant attention for anyone constructing a demanding visual rig. Even though NVIDIA T1000 (NVIDIA) possesses its positives, this performance numbers definitely benefits NVIDIA's NVIDIA RTX A1000 graphics. Make your choice based on this. This performance delta is significant sufficiently to affect.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
RTX A1000
T1000
Core Specs
Shading Units
2,304
896 -61.1%
Shaders
2,304
896 -61.1%
TMUs
72
56 -22.2%
ROPs
32
32 0.0%
SM Count
18
14 -22.2%
Clocks
Base Clock
727 MHz
1065 MHz
Boost Clock
1462 MHz
1395 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz 12 Gbps effective
1250 MHz 10 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
8 GB
4 GB
VRAM (MB)
8,192
4,096 -50.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
128 bit
128 bit
Bandwidth
192.0 GB/s
160.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
2 MB
1024 KB
Performance
Pixel Rate
46.78 GPixel/s
44.64 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
105.3 GTexel/s
78.12 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
6.737 TFLOPS
2.500 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
105.3 GFLOPS (1:64)
78.12 GFLOPS (1:32)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
6.737 TFLOPS (1:1)
5.000 TFLOPS (2:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
18
Tensor Cores
72
Power
TDP
50 W
50 W
TDP (W)
50
50 0.0%
Suggested PSU
250 W
250 W
Power Connectors
None
None
Architecture
Architecture
Ampere
Turing
GPU Name
GA107
TU117
Generation
Workstation Ampere (Ax000)
Quadro Turing (Tx000)
Process Size
8 nm
12 nm
Transistors
8,700 million
4,700 million
Die Size
200 mm²
200 mm²
Foundry
Samsung
TSMC
Density
43.5M / mm²
23.5M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 (12_1)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
8.6
7.5
Shader Model
6.8
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
Single-slot
Single-slot
Length
163 mm 6.4 inches
156 mm 6.1 inches
Height
69 mm 2.7 inches
69 mm 2.7 inches
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 3.0 x16
Other
Production
Active
End-of-life
Predecessor
Quadro Turing
Quadro Volta
Successor
Workstation Ada
Workstation Ampere
View RTX A1000 Details View T1000 Details