NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The benchmark data presents an unusual situation. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell has a recorded benchmark score in the database, while the Lisuan Tech LX PRO currently has no recorded benchmark entries. This means the direct comparison of measured performance is one-sided, but the specification sheets still allow for a substantive analysis of where each product would hold an advantage based on the recorded data.

The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell shows a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 16408. Its nearest rivals in the database include the AMD Radeon PRO W7500 at 16415, which is essentially tied with a delta of 0 percent, and the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT at 16361, where the NVIDIA card leads by 0.3 percent. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 scores 16504, putting the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell 0.6 percent behind that part. These are extremely tight margins, all within a range of roughly one percent, which indicates that in the single recorded workload, the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell sits in a narrow competitive band rather than dominating or being dominated.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no benchmark scores in the database and no nearest rivals listed. Its average benchmark score is recorded as zero, and its percentile versus all GPUs is 50. Without measured results, the database cannot confirm any workload-specific win for this card. The wins that can be attributed to it are structural, based on its physical and electrical specifications, not on measured performance data.

The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell wins on every measured dimension available in the database. It has a full benchmark result, a percentile ranking of 59 versus all GPUs, and a set of nearest rivals that contextualize its score. The LX PRO has none of these, so the data-driven verdict is straightforward: the NVIDIA card is the only one of the two with verifiable performance in the record.

Architecture Differences

The two cards diverge at the fundamental architecture level. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell uses the GB202 chip built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The die measures 750 mm² and contains 92,200 million transistors, giving a transistor density of 122.9 million per square millimeter. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO uses a chip designated 7G105 under the TrueGPU architecture, fabricated on a 6 nm process also at TSMC. Its transistor count and die size are listed as unknown, so no density figure can be calculated.

The memory subsystems are entirely different generations. NVIDIA pairs 96 GB of GDDR7 on a 512 bit bus, reaching a bandwidth of 1.79 TB/s, with a memory clock of 1750 MHz and 28 Gbps effective. The LX PRO has 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192 bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s, with a memory clock of 2250 MHz and 18 Gbps effective. The NVIDIA card has four times the memory capacity and more than four times the bandwidth.

Compute resources also favor NVIDIA heavily. The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell has 24064 shading units, 752 texture mapping units, 192 ROPs, 188 ray tracing cores, and 752 tensor cores. The LX PRO has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, with no ray tracing cores or tensor cores listed. The pixel rate for NVIDIA is 502.5 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s for the LX PRO. The texture rate is 1968.0 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s. FP32 throughput is 126.0 TFLOPS for NVIDIA versus 24.58 TFLOPS for the LX PRO. FP16 on NVIDIA is 126.0 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio, while the LX PRO reaches 49.15 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio.

The NVIDIA card is built on PCIe 5.0 x16, while the LX PRO uses PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs differ as well, with NVIDIA providing 4x DisplayPort 2.1b and the LX PRO providing 4x DisplayPort 1.4a. API support is nearly identical, both offering DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6, but NVIDIA lists Vulkan 1.4 while the LX PRO lists Vulkan 1.3.

The NVIDIA card requires a 600 W TDP with a suggested 1000 W power supply and a single 16 pin connector. The LX PRO draws 225 W with a suggested 550 W power supply and also uses a single 16 pin connector. Both are dual slot cards. Physical dimensions favor the LX PRO in length and height, but the NVIDIA card is thinner. The LX PRO measures 248 mm in length, 118 mm in height, and 48 mm in width. The NVIDIA card measures 304 mm in length, 137 mm in height, and 40 mm in width.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

There are no head-to-head benchmark entries in the database for these two products. The only measured score belongs to the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, which recorded 16408 in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has an empty benchmark list and an average benchmark score of zero, so no direct comparison of measured results is possible.

The nearest rivals for the NVIDIA card provide the only benchmark context. The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 scored 16415, a delta of 0 percent relative to the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell. The AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT scored 16361, putting it 0.3 percent behind the NVIDIA part. The AMD Radeon Pro 5600M scored 16351, 0.4 percent behind. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 scored 16504, placing it 0.6 percent ahead of the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell. These deltas are all within a single percentage point, meaning the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is competitive with these four cards in the Steel Nomad test, but no clear winner emerges from that group.

For the LX PRO, there are no rival scores and no benchmark results. The database records its percentile versus all GPUs as 50, but with no measured score, this percentile carries no comparative weight. The specification sheet suggests it would trail the NVIDIA card in raw throughput, but the database contains no measured data to confirm or refute that expectation.

The recorded data shows that the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell sits in a tight cluster with its nearest rivals, none of which separate themselves by more than a fraction of a percent. The LX PRO cannot be placed in any such cluster because it has no recorded scores.

FAQ

Q: What is the recorded benchmark score for the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell?

A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell has a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 16408.

Q: Does the Lisuan Tech LX PRO have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No, the database lists no benchmark entries for the LX PRO, and its average benchmark score is recorded as zero.

Q: How does the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell compare to its nearest rivals in the database?

A: It is essentially tied with the AMD Radeon PRO W7500 at a delta of 0 percent, leads the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT by 0.3 percent, leads the AMD Radeon Pro 5600M by 0.4 percent, and trails the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 by 0.6 percent.

Q: What are the memory capacity and bandwidth differences between the two cards?

A: The NVIDIA card has 96 GB of GDDR7 on a 512 bit bus with 1.79 TB/s bandwidth, while the LX PRO has 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192 bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Which card has more shading units?

A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell has 24064 shading units, while the Lisuan Tech LX PRO has 6144 shading units.

Q: What is the FP32 throughput for each card?

A: The NVIDIA card delivers 126.0 TFLOPS, while the LX PRO delivers 24.58 TFLOPS.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ across nearly every specification field in the database.

The process node is 5 nm for NVIDIA and 6 nm for the LX PRO, both at TSMC. The NVIDIA chip is GB202 with 92,200 million transistors on a 750 mm² die. The LX PRO chip is 7G105 with unknown transistor count and die size.

Memory capacity is 96 GB versus 24 GB. Memory type is GDDR7 versus GDDR6. Bus width is 512 bit versus 192 bit. Bandwidth is 1.79 TB/s versus 432.0 GB/s. Memory clock is 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective versus 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective.

Shading units are 24064 versus 6144. TMUs are 752 versus 192. ROPs are 192 versus 96. Ray tracing cores are 188 on NVIDIA, with none listed on the LX PRO. Tensor cores are 752 on NVIDIA, with none listed on the LX PRO.

Pixel rate is 502.5 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s. Texture rate is 1968.0 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s. FP32 is 126.0 TFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS. FP16 is 126.0 TFLOPS at 1:1 versus 49.15 TFLOPS at 2:1.

TDP is 600 W versus 225 W. Suggested power supply is 1000 W versus 550 W. Bus interface is PCIe 5.0 x16 versus PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs are 4x DisplayPort 2.1b versus 4x DisplayPort 1.4a. Vulkan support is 1.4 versus 1.3.

Dimensions differ: the NVIDIA card is 304 mm long, 137 mm high, and 40 mm wide. The LX PRO is 248 mm long, 118 mm high, and 48 mm wide.

The NVIDIA card has a launch MSRP of 8,565 USD. The LX PRO has no launch MSRP recorded.

The NVIDIA card lists a predecessor as Workstation Ada, while the LX PRO has no predecessor. The NVIDIA card has a release date of 2025-03-17, while the LX PRO has a release date of 2026-03-16.

The Verdict

The database presents a clear asymmetry. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell has a measured benchmark score, a percentile ranking of 59 versus all GPUs, and a set of nearest rivals that place its performance in context. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no benchmark scores, no nearest rivals, and an average score of zero. Any selection between the two must be based on the specification data, since the LX PRO has no measured performance record to weigh.

From the specification sheet, the NVIDIA card delivers substantially higher raw compute. Its FP32 throughput of 126.0 TFLOPS is more than five times the 24.58 TFLOPS of the LX PRO. Its texture rate of 1968.0 GTexel/s is more than five times the 384.0 GTexel/s of the LX PRO. Its pixel rate of 502.5 GPixel/s is more than two and a half times the 192.0 GPixel/s of the LX PRO. Memory bandwidth of 1.79 TB/s is more than four times the 432.0 GB/s of the LX PRO, and memory capacity of 96 GB is four times the 24 GB of the LX PRO.

The NVIDIA card also carries features that the LX PRO does not list at all, including ray tracing cores and tensor cores. It uses a newer PCIe generation, newer DisplayPort outputs, and a newer Vulkan version. Its power draw is higher, at 600 W versus 225 W, and it requires a larger power supply, but the specification sheet does not indicate any performance penalty from that higher draw, only a higher requirement.

The LX PRO has advantages in physical footprint, being shorter and shorter in height, though it is wider. It also has a lower TDP and a lower suggested power supply rating, which could be relevant in constrained environments. But the database contains no measured performance data for the LX PRO, so any claim of real-world capability cannot be substantiated from the record.

The recorded data points to the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell as the only card with verifiable benchmark results. Its Steel Nomad score of 16408 places it within one percent of four rival cards, all of which are closely matched. The LX PRO cannot be positioned relative to any of those cards because it has no scores.

For a user who prioritizes measured performance, the database supports the NVIDIA card without qualification. For a user who prioritizes lower power draw and a smaller physical footprint, the LX PRO has structural advantages, but those advantages are not backed by any benchmark data in the record. The verdict from the database is that the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is the better-documented, higher-throughput option, while the Lisuan Tech LX PRO remains an unmeasured product whose real-world performance cannot be confirmed.