NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server
Lisuan Tech LX PRO
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO
FAQ
Q: What is the benchmark standing of the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server compared to the Lisuan Tech LX PRO?
A: The database records a single benchmark score for the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server: 5,996 points in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test. This places it at the 34th percentile among all GPUs. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no recorded benchmark scores, an average score of 0, and a percentile ranking of 50, meaning no direct performance comparison can be drawn from recorded measurements.
Q: How does the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server compare to its nearest rivals in the database?
A: The recorded data shows the NVIDIA card is essentially tied with its closest competitors. It sits 0.1% behind the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M (which scores 6,000) and the AMD Radeon RX 6400 (which scores 6,001). It is 0.2% ahead of the AMD FirePro W4100 (which scores 5,987) and the NVIDIA Quadro K4000M (which scores 5,986). The differences are within one point, indicating near-identical benchmark output.
Q: What are the memory specifications of each card?
A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server uses 96 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus, delivering 1.79 TB/s of bandwidth. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO uses 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The NVIDIA card offers four times the memory capacity and roughly four times the bandwidth.
Q: What is the compute performance difference between the two cards?
A: The NVIDIA card delivers 126.0 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and the same 126.0 TFLOPS of FP16 compute at a 1:1 ratio. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO delivers 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 and 49.15 TFLOPS of FP16 at a 2:1 ratio. The NVIDIA card is roughly 5.1 times ahead in FP32 throughput.
Q: Which card has the higher transistor count and die size?
A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server is built on a 5 nm process with 92,200 million transistors on a 750 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 122.9 million per square millimeter. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO is built on a 6 nm process, but its transistor count, die size, and density are recorded as unknown in the database.
Q: What are the power requirements for each card?
A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server has a TDP of 600 W and requires a 1000 W suggested power supply. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has a TDP of 225 W and a 550 W suggested power supply. Both cards use a single 16-pin power connector and are dual-slot designs.
Architecture Differences
The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server is built on the GB202 chip using the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO uses the 7G105 chip based on a "TrueGPU" architecture, manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The NVIDIA card belongs to the Server Blackwell (Bxx) generation, while the LX PRO belongs to the 7G100 generation.
The NVIDIA card integrates 24,064 shading units, 752 texture mapping units, and 192 ROPs. It also includes 188 ray tracing cores and 752 tensor cores. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO contains 6,144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, with no dedicated ray tracing or tensor core counts recorded in the database. This represents a 3.9x difference in shading units and a 3.9x difference in TMUs.
Clock behavior differs substantially. The NVIDIA card has specified base and boost clocks of 1,590 MHz and 2,617 MHz respectively. The LX PRO has no base or boost clock values recorded, only a memory clock of 2,250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The NVIDIA memory clock is 1,750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective speed, indicating a faster memory technology in GDDR7 versus the LX PRO's GDDR6.
The rendering pipelines diverge sharply. The NVIDIA card achieves a pixel rate of 502.5 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 1,968.0 GTexel/s. The LX PRO produces 192.0 GPixel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s. These figures show the NVIDIA card is 2.6 times faster in pixel throughput and 5.1 times faster in texture throughput.
Compute ratios differ in nature. The NVIDIA card runs FP16 at a 1:1 ratio with FP32, both at 126.0 TFLOPS. The LX PRO runs FP16 at a 2:1 ratio, delivering 49.15 TFLOPS against 24.58 TFLOPS FP32. The NVIDIA approach favors uniform throughput across precision formats, while the LX PRO doubles its half-precision output.
The bus interfaces also differ. The NVIDIA card uses PCIe 5.0 x16, while the LX PRO uses PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs are 4x DisplayPort 2.1b on the NVIDIA card versus 4x DisplayPort 1.4a on the LX PRO. API support is nearly identical, with both cards supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6, but the NVIDIA card supports Vulkan 1.4 while the LX PRO supports Vulkan 1.3.
Physical dimensions vary. The NVIDIA card is 267 mm long, 111 mm tall, and 40 mm wide. The LX PRO is 248 mm long, 118 mm tall, and 48 mm wide. The LX PRO is shorter but taller and thicker.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries between these two cards. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server has a recorded score of 5,996 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, while the Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no benchmark entries at all, resulting in an average benchmark score of 0 and zero wins on both sides.
The NVIDIA card's recorded benchmark places it at the 34th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals in the database are all within a fraction of a percent: the GeForce GTX 770M at 6,000 (0.1% ahead), the Radeon RX 6400 at 6,001 (0.1% ahead), the FirePro W4100 at 5,987 (0.2% behind), and the Quadro K4000M at 5,986 (0.2% behind). These delta values indicate the NVIDIA card's measured performance is statistically indistinguishable from these four rivals in this specific test.
The LX PRO's percentile ranking of 50 suggests its classification in the database, but without any recorded benchmark scores, no direct comparison to the NVIDIA card or any other GPU is possible from the data. The absence of head-to-head results means any performance relationship between the two cards must be inferred from their architectural specifications rather than measured outcomes.
The data shows that in the one benchmark where a score exists, the NVIDIA card performs in line with older, lower-tier GPUs from prior generations. This is notable given the card's substantial architectural resources, such as 24,064 shading units and 126.0 TFLOPS FP32. The benchmark result does not reflect the card's theoretical compute ceiling, suggesting the Steel Nomad workload may not scale with the NVIDIA card's specific feature set.
For the LX PRO, the lack of any recorded measurements leaves its practical performance entirely uncharacterized. The database lists no rival scores, no benchmark entries, and no average score. Its 50th percentile classification exists without supporting measurement data.
The Verdict
From the recorded data, the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server is the only card with measurable benchmark output. Its 5,996 score in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 places it at the 34th percentile, effectively tied with the GeForce GTX 770M, Radeon RX 6400, FirePro W4100, and Quadro K4000M. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no scores, so its actual performance cannot be verified against the NVIDIA card or any other GPU.
On paper, the NVIDIA card dominates the LX PRO in nearly every architectural category. It quadruples memory capacity (96 GB vs 24 GB), quadruples memory bandwidth (1.79 TB/s vs 432.0 GB/s), and delivers 5.1 times the FP32 throughput (126.0 TFLOPS vs 24.58 TFLOPS). It also has 3.9 times the shading units, 3.9 times the TMUs, and double the ROPs. The NVIDIA card includes 188 ray tracing cores and 752 tensor cores, features absent from the LX PRO's recorded specifications.
The NVIDIA card's higher TDP of 600 W versus 225 W reflects its larger computational footprint. It requires a 1000 W suggested power supply versus 550 W for the LX PRO. The NVIDIA card also uses a newer PCIe 5.0 interface and DisplayPort 2.1b outputs, while the LX PRO uses PCIe 4.0 and DisplayPort 1.4a.
The LX PRO counters with a smaller physical footprint in length (248 mm vs 267 mm) and a higher memory clock of 2,250 MHz versus 1,750 MHz on the NVIDIA card. Its FP16 output of 49.15 TFLOPS, while lower than the NVIDIA card's 126.0 TFLOPS, represents a 2:1 ratio that doubles its FP32 figure. The LX PRO also has a higher percentile ranking at 50, though this is recorded without benchmark support.
The data indicates the NVIDIA card is the stronger choice for workloads requiring large memory capacity, high bandwidth, and maximum FP32 throughput. The LX PRO appears suited for environments where lower power consumption and a shorter card length matter, but its performance cannot be confirmed from the database.
Specification Differences
| Field | NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server | Lisuan Tech LX PRO |
|-------|---------------------------------------|---------------------|
| Chip | GB202 | 7G105 |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | TrueGPU |
| Generation | Server Blackwell (Bxx) | 7G100 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 6 nm |
| Transistors | 92,200 million | unknown |
| Die Size | 750 mm² | unknown |
| Transistor Density | 122.9M / mm² | null |
| Memory Clock | 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective) | 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) |
| Memory Size | 96 GB | 24 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR7 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bus Width | 512 bit | 192 bit |
| Memory Bandwidth | 1.79 TB/s | 432.0 GB/s |
| Shading Units | 24,064 | 6,144 |
| TMUs | 752 | 192 |
| ROPs | 192 | 96 |
| RT Cores | 188 | null |
| Tensor Cores | 752 | null |
| Pixel Rate | 502.5 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |
| Texture Rate | 1,968.0 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |
| FP32 | 126.0 TFLOPS | 24.58 TFLOPS |
| FP16 | 126.0 TFLOPS (1:1) | 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) |
| TDP | 600 W | 225 W |
| Suggested PSU | 1000 W | 550 W |
| Bus Interface | PCIe 5.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Display Outputs | 4x DisplayPort 2.1b | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |
| Vulkan Version | 1.4 | 1.3 |
| Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 248 mm (9.8 inches) |
| Height | 111 mm (4.4 inches) | 118 mm (4.6 inches) |
| Width | 40 mm (1.6 inches) | 48 mm (1.9 inches) |
| Release Date | 2025-03-17 | 2026-03-16 |
| Base Clock | 1590 MHz | null |
| Boost Clock | 2617 MHz | null |