NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

FAQ

Q: What are the headline performance numbers for the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q and the Lisuan Tech LX PRO?

A: The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q scores 11088 in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 benchmark, while the Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. The NVIDIA card delivers 109.7 TFLOPS FP32 and 109.7 TFLOPS FP16 (1:1), whereas the Lisuan Tech LX PRO delivers 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1).

Q: How does the memory configuration differ between the two cards?

A: The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q has 96 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus with 1.79 TB/s bandwidth. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The NVIDIA card's memory clock is 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective), while the Lisuan Tech card runs at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective).

Q: Which card uses a more advanced manufacturing process?

A: The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q is built on a 5 nm process at TSMC with 92,200 million transistors on a 750 mm² die. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO uses a 6 nm process, also at TSMC, with transistor count and die size listed as unknown in the database.

Q: What is the power requirement difference?

A: The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q has a 300 W TDP and suggests a 700 W power supply. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has a 225 W TDP and suggests a 550 W power supply. Both cards use a single 16-pin power connector and are dual-slot designs.

Q: Do both cards support the same API levels?

A: Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q supports Vulkan 1.4, while the Lisuan Tech LX PRO supports Vulkan 1.3.

Q: What are the physical dimensions of each card?

A: The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q measures 267 mm (10.5 inches) in length, 111 mm (4.4 inches) in height, and 40 mm (1.6 inches) in width. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO measures 248 mm (9.8 inches) in length, 118 mm (4.6 inches) in height, and 48 mm (1.9 inches) in width.

Architecture Differences

The two cards come from fundamentally different design lineages. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q uses the GB202 chip built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, part of the Blackwell PRO W (x000) generation. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO uses the 7G105 chip on the TrueGPU architecture, belonging to the 7G100 generation.

The manufacturing processes differ by one node step. NVIDIA's card is fabricated on a 5 nm process, while the Lisuan Tech card uses a 6 nm process, both at TSMC. The transistor budget is starkly different: the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q packs 92,200 million transistors across a 750 mm² die, achieving a density of 122.9M per mm². The Lisuan Tech LX PRO's transistor count and die size are not recorded in the database, which limits direct density comparisons.

Compute resources diverge sharply. The NVIDIA card contains 24,064 shading units, 752 texture mapping units, and 192 render output units. It also includes 188 ray tracing cores and 752 tensor cores. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has 6,144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, with no ray tracing core or tensor core counts recorded. This structural difference means the NVIDIA card is designed for workloads that leverage dedicated ray tracing and AI acceleration hardware, while the Lisuan Tech card's feature set in those areas remains unspecified.

The memory architecture also reflects different design goals. The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q uses GDDR7 on a 512-bit interface, while the Lisuan Tech LX PRO uses GDDR6 on a 192-bit interface. The NVIDIA card's memory clock of 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective) combined with the wider bus produces 1.79 TB/s bandwidth. The Lisuan Tech card runs its memory at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) but the narrower bus limits bandwidth to 432.0 GB/s.

Both cards support PCIe, but at different generations: the NVIDIA card uses PCIe 5.0 x16, while the Lisuan Tech card uses PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs also differ, with the NVIDIA card offering 4x DisplayPort 2.1b and the Lisuan Tech card offering 4x DisplayPort 1.4a.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between these two cards. The only recorded performance data belongs to the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q, which scored 11088 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no benchmark entries, making direct numerical comparison impossible from recorded measurements.

However, the NVIDIA card's nearest rivals in the database provide context for its performance tier. The RTX PRO 6000D Blackwell Max-Q matches it exactly with an average score of 11088 and a 0% delta. The AMD Radeon RX 550 scores 11075, placing it 0.1% behind. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER scores 11047, which is 0.4% behind. The AMD FirePro W4300 scores 11225, putting it 1.2% ahead of the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q.

These rival deltas show that the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q sits in a tightly clustered performance band in this particular benchmark, despite its massive compute specifications. The percentile rank of 50 against all GPUs in the database indicates it lands exactly at the median position.

For the Lisuan Tech LX PRO, the absence of benchmark data means its performance relative to the NVIDIA card cannot be quantified from the database. The theoretical compute figures do suggest a large gap: the NVIDIA card delivers 109.7 TFLOPS FP32 versus 24.58 TFLOPS for the Lisuan Tech card, a 4.46x difference in raw FP32 throughput. Pixel rate also favors NVIDIA at 437.8 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s, a 2.28x difference. Texture rate shows an even wider gap: 1,714.6 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s, a 4.46x difference.

The FP16 comparison is more nuanced. The NVIDIA card delivers 109.7 TFLOPS FP16 with a 1:1 ratio to FP32, meaning it does not double-rate FP16. The Lisuan Tech card delivers 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 with a 2:1 ratio, meaning it achieves double its FP32 rate. In raw FP16 throughput, the NVIDIA card still leads by 2.23x.

Specification Differences

The following specifications differ between the two cards, based solely on recorded data:

Process and Die: The NVIDIA card uses a 5 nm process with a 750 mm² die and 92,200 million transistors. The Lisuan Tech card uses a 6 nm process with unknown die size and transistor count.

Clock Speeds: The NVIDIA card has a base clock of 1035 MHz and a boost clock of 2280 MHz. The Lisuan Tech card has no base or boost clock recorded. Memory clocks differ: 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective) for NVIDIA versus 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) for Lisuan Tech.

Memory: Size differs (96 GB versus 24 GB), type differs (GDDR7 versus GDDR6), bus width differs (512-bit versus 192-bit), and bandwidth differs (1.79 TB/s versus 432.0 GB/s).

Compute Units: Shading units (24,064 versus 6,144), TMUs (752 versus 192), ROPs (192 versus 96), RT cores (188 versus none recorded), and tensor cores (752 versus none recorded) all differ.

Rates: Pixel rate (437.8 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s), texture rate (1,714.6 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s), FP32 (109.7 TFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS), and FP16 (109.7 TFLOPS 1:1 versus 49.15 TFLOPS 2:1) all differ.

Power: TDP differs (300 W versus 225 W) and suggested PSU differs (700 W versus 550 W).

Bus Interface: PCIe 5.0 x16 versus PCIe 4.0 x16.

Display Outputs: 4x DisplayPort 2.1b versus 4x DisplayPort 1.4a.

Vulkan Support: Version 1.4 versus version 1.3.

Dimensions: Length (267 mm versus 248 mm), height (111 mm versus 118 mm), and width (40 mm versus 48 mm) all differ.

Release Date: The NVIDIA card was released on 2025-03-17. The Lisuan Tech card has a release date of 2026-03-16.

Launch MSRP: The NVIDIA card has a launch MSRP of 8,565 USD. The Lisuan Tech card has no launch MSRP recorded.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q wins on every measurable performance specification in the database. Its FP32 throughput of 109.7 TFLOPS is 4.46x higher than the Lisuan Tech LX PRO's 24.58 TFLOPS. Its memory bandwidth of 1.79 TB/s is 4.14x higher than the 432.0 GB/s available on the Lisuan Tech card. Its 96 GB memory capacity is 4x larger than the 24 GB on the Lisuan Tech card.

The NVIDIA card also wins on architectural features. It includes 188 dedicated ray tracing cores and 752 tensor cores, which the Lisuan Tech card does not record. This gives the NVIDIA card a structural advantage for ray-traced rendering and AI-accelerated workloads. The newer PCIe 5.0 interface provides double the bus bandwidth of the PCIe 4.0 link on the Lisuan Tech card. The DisplayPort 2.1b outputs support newer display standards than the DisplayPort 1.4a outputs on the Lisuan Tech card.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO wins on power efficiency in absolute terms. Its 225 W TDP is 75 W lower than the NVIDIA card's 300 W TDP, and its suggested power supply of 550 W is 150 W lower. It also has a smaller physical footprint in length, measuring 248 mm versus 267 mm for the NVIDIA card, though it is taller and wider. The Lisuan Tech card's FP16 ratio of 2:1 indicates it doubles FP16 throughput relative to FP32, which is not the case for the NVIDIA card's 1:1 ratio.

For workloads that prioritize minimum power draw and smaller length, the Lisuan Tech LX PRO has advantages. For every performance metric, the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q dominates.

The Verdict

The data clearly separates these two cards into different performance tiers. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q delivers 109.7 TFLOPS FP32, 96 GB of GDDR7 memory, 1.79 TB/s bandwidth, and a 300 W TDP. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO delivers 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, 24 GB of GDDR6 memory, 432.0 GB/s bandwidth, and a 225 W TDP.

The recorded benchmark score of 11088 for the NVIDIA card places it at the 50th percentile among all GPUs in the database, with its closest rival, the RTX PRO 6000D Blackwell Max-Q, matching it exactly at 11088. The AMD Radeon RX 550 trails by 0.1%, the GTX 1650 SUPER trails by 0.4%, and the AMD FirePro W4300 leads by 1.2%. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no benchmark score recorded, so its measured performance cannot be verified.

For users requiring maximum compute throughput, large memory capacity, ray tracing hardware, tensor cores, and the latest display and bus interfaces, the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q is the only choice supported by the data. Its 4.46x FP32 advantage, 4.14x bandwidth advantage, and 4x memory capacity advantage over the Lisuan Tech LX PRO are decisive.

For users prioritizing lower power consumption, a smaller power supply requirement, and a shorter card length, the Lisuan Tech LX PRO offers those specific attributes. Its 225 W TDP and 550 W suggested PSU are lower than the NVIDIA card's 300 W and 700 W figures. Its 248 mm length is 19 mm shorter.

The database shows no head-to-head benchmarks, no wins for either card, and no recorded performance for the Lisuan Tech LX PRO. The verdict rests on specification comparisons alone. The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q is the superior performer across every measured specification, while the Lisuan Tech LX PRO offers lower power requirements and a shorter physical length. Users should select based on whether raw performance or power efficiency and footprint matter more for their specific use case.