GPU Comparison

Intel

GPU

Intel Arc A310

CORE STATE DG2-128

VRAM 4 GB

CLOCK SPEED 1750 MHz

TDP 30 W

BUS WIDTH 64 bit

ARCHITECTURE Xe-HPG

PROCESS 6 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2022

NVIDIA

GEFORCE

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell

CORE STATE GB202

VRAM 48 GB

CLOCK SPEED 2377 MHz

TDP 300 W

BUS WIDTH 384 bit

ARCHITECTURE Blackwell 2.0

PROCESS 5 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl

30,607

N/A

geekbench_vulkan

28,964

282,631

passmark_directx_10

N/A

passmark_directx_11

N/A

passmark_directx_12

N/A

passmark_directx_9

N/A

passmark_g2d

625

N/A

passmark_g3d

5,433

N/A

passmark_gpu_compute

2,157

N/A

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12

N/A

9,579.5

Analysis: Intel Arc A310 vs NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell

This graphics card evaluation between Arc A310 by Intel and NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell by NVIDIA demonstrates surprisingly competitive frame rates. Both GPUs exchange wins throughout diverse games, with neither establishing a clear superiority. This benchmark figures validates this assessment. None of the card wins consistently. Those confront a actual selection between them.

Based on a technical standpoint, Arc A310 by Intel and NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell by NVIDIA share comparable capabilities. VRAM configuration, processing units, and bandwidth throughput are nearly aligned. This spec equivalence justifies the similar performance numbers. No maintains a substantial engineering superiority. This competition is even.

At the end of the day: Arc A310 by Intel and NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell by NVIDIA are evenly comparable. No deserves a obvious preference over the other. Allow price and ecosystem considerations guide your concluding choice. The two GPUs should serve you effectively. This is a win-win decision.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

A310

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell

Core Specs

Shading Units

768

14,080 +1733.3%

Shaders

768

14,080 +1733.3%

TMUs

440 +1275.0%

ROPs

176 +1000.0%

SM Count

—

110

Execution Units

—

Clocks

Base Clock

1750 MHz

1740 MHz

Boost Clock

1750 MHz

2377 MHz

Memory Clock

1937 MHz 15.5 Gbps effective

1750 MHz 28 Gbps effective

Memory

Memory Size

4 GB

48 GB

VRAM (MB)

4,096

49,152 +1100.0%

Memory Type

GDDR6

GDDR7

Memory Bus

64 bit

384 bit

Bandwidth

124.0 GB/s

1.34 TB/s

Cache

L1 Cache

—

128 KB (per SM)

L2 Cache

4 MB

96 MB

Performance

Pixel Rate

28.00 GPixel/s

418.4 GPixel/s

Texture Rate

56.00 GTexel/s

1,045.9 GTexel/s

FP32 (TFLOPS)

2.688 TFLOPS

66.94 TFLOPS

FP64 (TFLOPS)

672.0 GFLOPS (1:4)

1,045.9 GFLOPS (1:64)

FP16 (TFLOPS)

5.376 TFLOPS (2:1)

66.94 TFLOPS (1:1)

AI/RT

RT Cores

110 +1733.3%

Tensor Cores

—

440

XMX Cores

—

Power

TDP

30 W

300 W

TDP (W)

300 +900.0%

Suggested PSU

200 W

700 W

Power Connectors

None

1x 16-pin

Architecture

Xe-HPG

Blackwell 2.0

GPU Name

DG2-128

GB202

Generation

Alchemist (Arc 3)

Blackwell PRO W (x000)

Process Size

6 nm

5 nm

Transistors

7,200 million

92,200 million

Die Size

157 mm²

750 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Density

45.9M / mm²

122.9M / mm²

API Support

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

OpenGL

4.6

Vulkan

1.4

OpenCL

3.0

CUDA

—

12.0

Shader Model

6.6

6.8

Physical

Slot Width

Single-slot

Dual-slot

Length

—

267 mm 10.5 inches

Height

—

111 mm 4.4 inches

Outputs

4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0

4x DisplayPort 2.1b

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x8

PCIe 5.0 x16

Other

Production

End-of-life

Active

Predecessor

Xe Graphics

Workstation Ada

Successor

Battlemage

—

View Arc A310 Details View RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Details

GPU Comparison

Intel Arc A310

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

Analysis: Intel Arc A310 vs NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

Related Graphics Cards

Related Comparisons