NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The recorded data presents an unusual comparison: the NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell has a full set of benchmark results, while the Lisuan Tech LX PRO has an empty benchmark array and zero recorded wins. This means the use-case split is heavily one-sided in terms of measurable performance data. The NVIDIA card shows wins across all ten tested workloads, including 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 with a score of 2374.5, Geekbench OpenCL at 106087, Geekbench Vulkan at 113865, and Passmark G3D at 20049. The LX PRO cannot claim a single benchmark victory because no test results exist for it in the database.

For compute-heavy workloads, the NVIDIA card delivers a Passmark GPU Compute score of 8396, which places it in the 70th percentile among all GPUs. Its average benchmark score sits at 25269, with nearest rivals including the AMD Radeon RX 6700M at 25633 (1.4% higher), the AMD Radeon Pro W5700 at 25726 (1.8% higher), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile at 25740 (1.8% higher), and the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile at 24763 (2.0% lower). This indicates the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell competes directly with mid-range mobile and workstation GPUs from the previous generation.

The LX PRO, by contrast, has a percentile ranking of 50 and an average benchmark score of zero, meaning the database has no measured performance data to compare. Its specification sheet suggests a different design philosophy: 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth, 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, 96 ROPs, and 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 compute. These figures are all higher than the NVIDIA card's corresponding specs, but without benchmark results, the database cannot confirm whether those theoretical numbers translate to real-world wins.

The use-case split therefore depends on what data exists. For anyone relying on measured performance, the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is the only option with verified results. The LX PRO remains an unverified entry whose capabilities are entirely speculative based on its listed specifications.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different architectural lineages. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell uses the GB206 chip built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It contains 21,900 million transistors on a 181 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 121.0M per mm². The LX PRO uses the 7G105 chip with the TrueGPU architecture from the 7G100 generation, fabricated on a 6 nm process, also at TSMC. Its transistor count and die size are listed as unknown in the database.

Clock behavior differs substantially. The NVIDIA card has explicit base and boost clocks of 982 MHz and 1957 MHz respectively, with memory clocked at 1125 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The LX PRO has no base or boost clock listed, only a memory clock of 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). This absence of core clock data for the LX PRO makes direct frequency comparisons impossible.

Memory architecture diverges clearly. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell uses 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 128-bit bus, providing 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. The LX PRO uses 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The LX PRO has a 50% wider memory bus and 50% more capacity, resulting in exactly 50% more bandwidth.

Compute resources favor the LX PRO on paper. It lists 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, compared to the NVIDIA card's 4352 shading units, 136 TMUs, and 48 ROPs. The LX PRO also has a higher pixel rate at 192.0 GPixel/s versus 93.94 GPixel/s, and a higher texture rate at 384.0 GTexel/s versus 266.2 GTexel/s. FP32 throughput is 24.58 TFLOPS for the LX PRO against 17.03 TFLOPS for the NVIDIA card. FP16 performance for the LX PRO reaches 49.15 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio, while the NVIDIA card achieves 17.03 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio.

The NVIDIA card includes 34 RT cores and 136 tensor cores; the LX PRO lists no RT core or tensor core counts. The LX PRO lacks these specialized units entirely according to the database, which may affect ray tracing and AI-accelerated workloads.

Power and interface specifications also differ. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell has a 70 W TDP, draws power from the slot without additional connectors, and recommends a 250 W PSU. It uses PCIe 5.0 x8. The LX PRO has a 225 W TDP, requires one 16-pin power connector, recommends a 550 W PSU, and uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The NVIDIA card is smaller at 167 mm length, 69 mm height, and 20 mm width, versus the LX PRO's 248 mm length, 118 mm height, and 48 mm width.

Display outputs differ as well: the NVIDIA card provides four mini-DisplayPort 2.1b connectors, while the LX PRO provides four full-size DisplayPort 1.4a connectors. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6, but the NVIDIA card supports Vulkan 1.4 while the LX PRO supports Vulkan 1.3.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head benchmark array in the database is empty, and the win counts for both items are zero. This means no direct comparative testing has been recorded between the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell and the LX PRO. The only performance data available comes from the NVIDIA card's individual benchmark results.

The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell's scores across different API levels show varying performance characteristics. In Passmark tests, the DirectX 9 score of 241 is the highest among its DirectX results, followed by DirectX 11 at 174, DirectX 10 at 122, and DirectX 12 at 80. These numbers suggest the card performs relatively better on older API workloads than on modern DirectX 12 tasks, at least in the Passmark test suite. The 2D score of 1303 and G3D score of 20049 round out its Passmark profile.

In Geekbench tests, the Vulkan score of 113865 slightly exceeds the OpenCL score of 106087, indicating a modest advantage for the Vulkan API path. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 result of 2374.5 represents a modern, demanding workload.

Relative to its nearest rivals, the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell trails the AMD Radeon RX 6700M by 1.4%, the AMD Radeon Pro W5700 by 1.8%, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile by 1.8%, while leading the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile by 2.0%. These deltas are small, placing the card in a tight competitive cluster where no single GPU dominates by a wide margin.

Because the LX PRO has no recorded benchmarks, any head-to-head analysis must rely on theoretical specifications. The LX PRO's listed FP32 throughput of 24.58 TFLOPS is 44.3% higher than the NVIDIA card's 17.03 TFLOPS. Its pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s is more than double the NVIDIA card's 93.94 GPixel/s. Texture rate is 44.3% higher as well, at 384.0 GTexel/s versus 266.2 GTexel/s. Memory bandwidth is exactly 50% higher at 432.0 GB/s versus 288.0 GB/s.

However, these specification advantages remain unverified by benchmark data. The database records no actual test results for the LX PRO, so whether its higher theoretical throughput translates to faster real-world performance cannot be determined from available information.

The Verdict

Based strictly on recorded data, the NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is the only GPU with measured performance. Its benchmark results place it in the 70th percentile of all GPUs, with an average score of 25269. The LX PRO sits at the 50th percentile with an average score of zero, reflecting the complete absence of benchmark entries.

For workloads where verified performance matters, the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell has demonstrated results across DX9, DX10, DX11, DX12, Vulkan, OpenCL, and compute tests. Its nearest rivals are all within roughly 2% of its average score, indicating it performs at parity with a well-known set of mobile and workstation GPUs. The 70th percentile ranking confirms it sits above the median GPU in the database.

The LX PRO offers a larger memory pool of 24 GB versus 16 GB, higher bandwidth, more shading units, and greater theoretical compute throughput. It also requires substantially more power at 225 W versus 70 W, needs an external 16-pin connector, and recommends a 550 W PSU. These specifications suggest a card aimed at higher-performance workloads, but without benchmark data, the database cannot confirm any actual advantage.

The release timeline shows the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell appearing on 2025-08-10, while the LX PRO has a later release date of 2026-03-16. The NVIDIA card lists a predecessor in Workstation Ada, while the LX PRO has no predecessor or successor recorded. Both cards are marked as Active in production status.

Users who require validated performance data should consider the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell, as its benchmark results are fully documented. The LX PRO remains an unknown quantity in terms of real-world performance, despite its compelling specification sheet. The database contains no evidence that the LX PRO's higher theoretical numbers translate into faster execution.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell has an average benchmark score of 25269, while the Lisuan Tech LX PRO has an average benchmark score of 0.

Q: How much memory does each GPU have?

A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell has 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus, while the Lisuan Tech LX PRO has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus.

Q: What are the FP32 compute figures for both cards?

A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell delivers 17.03 TFLOPS FP32, while the Lisuan Tech LX PRO delivers 24.58 TFLOPS FP32.

Q: What is the power consumption difference?

A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell has a 70 W TDP and requires no power connectors, while the Lisuan Tech LX PRO has a 225 W TDP and requires one 16-pin connector.

Q: Which GPU has a higher percentile ranking among all GPUs?

A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell ranks in the 70th percentile, while the Lisuan Tech LX PRO ranks in the 50th percentile.

Q: Do both GPUs support the same APIs?

A: Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6, but the NVIDIA card supports Vulkan 1.4 while the LX PRO supports Vulkan 1.3.

Specification Differences

| Specification | NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell | Lisuan Tech LX PRO |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | TrueGPU |

| Chip | GB206 | 7G105 |

| Process Node | 5 nm | 6 nm |

| Transistors | 21,900 million | unknown |

| Die Size | 181 mm² | unknown |

| Transistor Density | 121.0M / mm² | null |

| Base Clock | 982 MHz | null |

| Boost Clock | 1957 MHz | null |

| Memory Clock | 1125 MHz (18 Gbps effective) | 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) |

| Memory Size | 16 GB | 24 GB |

| Memory Type | GDDR7 | GDDR6 |

| Memory Bus Width | 128 bit | 192 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 432.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 4352 | 6144 |

| TMUs | 136 | 192 |

| ROPs | 48 | 96 |

| RT Cores | 34 | null |

| Tensor Cores | 136 | null |

| Pixel Rate | 93.94 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 266.2 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 17.03 TFLOPS | 24.58 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 17.03 TFLOPS (1:1) | 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 70 W | 225 W |

| Power Connectors | None | 1x 16-pin |

| Suggested PSU | 250 W | 550 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 5.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1b | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| Vulkan Support | 1.4 | 1.3 |

| Length | 167 mm (6.6 inches) | 248 mm (9.8 inches) |

| Height | 69 mm (2.7 inches) | 118 mm (4.6 inches) |

| Width | 20 mm (0.8 inches) | 48 mm (1.9 inches) |

| Predecessor | Workstation Ada | null |

| Release Date | 2025-08-10 | 2026-03-16 |