GPU Comparison

Intel

GPU

Intel Arc A310

CORE STATE DG2-128

VRAM 4 GB

CLOCK SPEED 1750 MHz

TDP 30 W

BUS WIDTH 64 bit

ARCHITECTURE Xe-HPG

PROCESS 6 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2022

NVIDIA

GEFORCE

RTX A5500

CORE STATE GA102

VRAM 24 GB

CLOCK SPEED 1665 MHz

TDP 230 W

BUS WIDTH 384 bit

ARCHITECTURE Ampere

PROCESS 8 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2022

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl

30,607

174,637

geekbench_vulkan

28,964

155,797

passmark_directx_10

N/A

passmark_directx_11

N/A

passmark_directx_12

N/A

passmark_directx_9

N/A

passmark_g2d

625

N/A

passmark_g3d

5,433

N/A

passmark_gpu_compute

2,157

N/A

Analysis: Intel Arc A310 vs NVIDIA RTX A5500

Visual performance evaluations between GeForce NVIDIA RTX A5500 and Radeon Arc A310 reveal a clear victor. GeForce NVIDIA RTX A5500 offers significantly stronger frame rates over current titles. The video memory superiority and design upgrades translate into clearly improved rendering performance. Score numbers confirms this observation. Players looking for premium visuals will factor this in.

In-game benchmarks across multiple resolutions steadily support GeForce NVIDIA RTX A5500. From fast-paced genres to demanding games, GeForce NVIDIA RTX A5500 holds its superiority. The gaming steadiness across diverse scenarios shows underlying technical benefits. Players might rely on strong experiences irrespective of game type. The capability is outstanding.

All things considered, GeForce NVIDIA RTX A5500 provides the better pick in this evaluation. The benchmark edges validate evaluation for users putting together a high-performance rendering system. Though Radeon Arc A310 features its positives, the benchmark numbers undeniably favors GeForce NVIDIA RTX A5500. Make your decision considering this. This gaming difference is significant enough to influence.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

A310

RTX A5500

Core Specs

Shading Units

768

10,240 +1233.3%

Shaders

768

10,240 +1233.3%

TMUs

320 +900.0%

ROPs

96 +500.0%

SM Count

—

Execution Units

—

Clocks

Base Clock

1750 MHz

1080 MHz

Boost Clock

1750 MHz

1665 MHz

Memory Clock

1937 MHz 15.5 Gbps effective

2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective

Memory

Memory Size

4 GB

24 GB

VRAM (MB)

4,096

24,576 +500.0%

Memory Type

GDDR6

Memory Bus

64 bit

384 bit

Bandwidth

124.0 GB/s

768.0 GB/s

Cache

L1 Cache

—

128 KB (per SM)

L2 Cache

4 MB

6 MB

Performance

Pixel Rate

28.00 GPixel/s

159.8 GPixel/s

Texture Rate

56.00 GTexel/s

532.8 GTexel/s

FP32 (TFLOPS)

2.688 TFLOPS

34.10 TFLOPS

FP64 (TFLOPS)

672.0 GFLOPS (1:4)

532.8 GFLOPS (1:64)

FP16 (TFLOPS)

5.376 TFLOPS (2:1)

34.10 TFLOPS (1:1)

AI/RT

RT Cores

80 +1233.3%

Tensor Cores

—

320

XMX Cores

—

Power

TDP

30 W

230 W

TDP (W)

230 +666.7%

Suggested PSU

200 W

550 W

Power Connectors

None

1x 8-pin

Architecture

Xe-HPG

Ampere

GPU Name

DG2-128

GA102

Generation

Alchemist (Arc 3)

Workstation Ampere (Ax000)

Process Size

6 nm

8 nm

Transistors

7,200 million

28,300 million

Die Size

157 mm²

628 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Samsung

Density

45.9M / mm²

45.1M / mm²

API Support

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

OpenGL

4.6

Vulkan

1.4

OpenCL

3.0

CUDA

—

8.6

Shader Model

6.6

6.8

Physical

Slot Width

Single-slot

Dual-slot

Length

—

267 mm 10.5 inches

Height

—

112 mm 4.4 inches

Outputs

4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0

4x DisplayPort 1.4a

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x8

PCIe 4.0 x16

Other

Production

End-of-life

Predecessor

Xe Graphics

Quadro Turing

Successor

Battlemage

Workstation Ada

View Arc A310 Details View RTX A5500 Details

GPU Comparison

Intel Arc A310

RTX A5500

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

Analysis: Intel Arc A310 vs NVIDIA RTX A5500

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

Related Graphics Cards

Related Comparisons