GPU Comparison

AMD

RADEON

AMD Radeon 760M

CORE STATE Phoenix

VRAM System Shared

CLOCK SPEED 2599 MHz

TDP 15 W

BUS WIDTH System Shared

ARCHITECTURE RDNA 3.0

PROCESS 4 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2024

NVIDIA

GEFORCE

RTX A5500 Mobile

CORE STATE GA103

VRAM 16 GB

CLOCK SPEED 1500 MHz

TDP 165 W

BUS WIDTH 256 bit

ARCHITECTURE Ampere

PROCESS 8 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2022

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12

400

N/A

geekbench_opencl

20,255

124,287

geekbench_vulkan

30,336

103,601

passmark_directx_10

N/A

passmark_directx_11

N/A

passmark_directx_12

N/A

passmark_directx_9

N/A

passmark_g2d

890

N/A

passmark_g3d

5,310

N/A

passmark_gpu_compute

2,840

N/A

Analysis: AMD Radeon 760M vs NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile

If analyzing Radeon NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile with AMD Radeon 760M, the benchmark delta becomes quickly visible. Radeon NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile takes the advantage in virtually most game we performed. The margin is notable sufficiently to impact actual gaming quality. Enthusiasts will observe smoother performance. The verdict is obvious.

AMD Radeon 760M faces challenges to rival Radeon NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile's pure power. For cost-sensitive builders, AMD Radeon 760M could nonetheless provide sufficient results, though users demanding premium quality would lean toward Radeon NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile. This benchmark gap is significantly substantial to overlook. Demanding titles especially reveal this gap. This investment returns rewards in capability.

All things considered, Radeon NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile provides the better pick in this matchup. Its benchmark edges warrant consideration for anyone constructing a demanding visual system. Though AMD Radeon 760M features its strengths, this score data clearly supports Radeon NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile. Make your conclusion based on this. The frame rate margin is notable enough to affect.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

760M

RTX A5500 Mobile

Core Specs

Shading Units

512

7,424 +1350.0%

Shaders

512

7,424 +1350.0%

TMUs

232 +625.0%

ROPs

96 +500.0%

Compute Units

—

SM Count

—

Clocks

Base Clock

800 MHz

975 MHz

Boost Clock

2599 MHz

1500 MHz

Memory Clock

System Shared

2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective

Memory

Memory Size

System Shared

16 GB

VRAM (MB)

—

16,384

Memory Type

System Shared

GDDR6

Memory Bus

System Shared

256 bit

Bandwidth

System Dependent

512.0 GB/s

Cache

L1 Cache

128 KB per Array

128 KB (per SM)

L2 Cache

2 MB

4 MB

L0 Cache

32 KB per WGP

—

Performance

Pixel Rate

41.58 GPixel/s

144.0 GPixel/s

Texture Rate

83.17 GTexel/s

348.0 GTexel/s

FP32 (TFLOPS)

5.323 TFLOPS

22.27 TFLOPS

FP64 (TFLOPS)

332.7 GFLOPS (1:16)

348.0 GFLOPS (1:64)

FP16 (TFLOPS)

5.323 TFLOPS (1:1)

22.27 TFLOPS (1:1)

AI/RT

RT Cores

58 +625.0%

Tensor Cores

—

232

Power

TDP

15 W

165 W

TDP (W)

165 +1000.0%

Power Connectors

None

Architecture

RDNA 3.0

Ampere

GPU Name

Phoenix

GA103

Generation

Navi III IGP (Phoenix)

Ampere-MW (Ax000)

Process Size

4 nm

8 nm

Transistors

25,390 million

22,000 million

Die Size

178 mm²

496 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Samsung

Density

142.6M / mm²

44.4M / mm²

API Support

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

OpenGL

4.6

Vulkan

1.4

OpenCL

2.1

3.0

CUDA

—

8.6

Shader Model

6.8

Physical

Slot Width

IGP

—

Outputs

Motherboard Dependent

Portable Device Dependent

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x8

PCIe 4.0 x16

Other

Production

Active

End-of-life

Predecessor

Navi II IGP

Quadro Turing-M

Successor

—

Ada-MW

View Radeon 760M Details View RTX A5500 Mobile Details

GPU Comparison

AMD Radeon 760M

RTX A5500 Mobile

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

Analysis: AMD Radeon 760M vs NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

Related Graphics Cards

Related Comparisons