GPU Comparison

Intel

GPU

Intel Arc A370M

CORE STATE DG2-128

VRAM 4 GB

CLOCK SPEED 2050 MHz

TDP 35 W

BUS WIDTH 64 bit

ARCHITECTURE Xe-HPG

PROCESS 6 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2022

NVIDIA

GEFORCE

RTX A5000

CORE STATE GA102

VRAM 24 GB

CLOCK SPEED 1695 MHz

TDP 230 W

BUS WIDTH 384 bit

ARCHITECTURE Ampere

PROCESS 8 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2021

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl

29,676

157,905

geekbench_vulkan

28,673

137,828

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12

N/A

3,783

passmark_directx_10

N/A

153

passmark_directx_11

N/A

187

passmark_directx_12

N/A

passmark_directx_9

N/A

251

passmark_g2d

N/A

1,032

passmark_g3d

N/A

22,541

passmark_gpu_compute

N/A

12,455

Analysis: Intel Arc A370M vs NVIDIA RTX A5000

Analyzing the test figures for NVIDIA NVIDIA RTX A5000 graphics card and the Arc A370M card from Intel, an obvious pattern emerges. NVIDIA NVIDIA RTX A5000 graphics card steadily delivers stronger scores in every evaluation. The rendering superiority extends from noticeable to remarkable depending on the individual title. This consistency points to underlying architectural advantages. Buyers wanting gaming capability should take note.

Playing games performance over different titles steadily benefit NVIDIA NVIDIA RTX A5000 graphics card. From fast-paced games to blockbuster titles, NVIDIA NVIDIA RTX A5000 graphics card holds its lead. The benchmark steadiness throughout diverse games shows core design benefits. Users might count on excellent experiences no matter of game type. The versatility is impressive.

The bottom line: NVIDIA NVIDIA RTX A5000 graphics card takes this matchup clearly. Users seeking rendering power might seriously consider NVIDIA NVIDIA RTX A5000 graphics card over the Arc A370M card from Intel. The benchmark results validates this conclusion. Your titles might execute considerably more fluidly. This is a clear victor in this tier.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

A370M

RTX A5000

Core Specs

Shading Units

1,024

8,192 +700.0%

Shaders

1,024

8,192 +700.0%

TMUs

256 +300.0%

ROPs

96 +200.0%

SM Count

—

Execution Units

128

—

Clocks

Base Clock

1550 MHz

1170 MHz

Boost Clock

2050 MHz

1695 MHz

Memory Clock

1750 MHz 14 Gbps effective

2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective

Memory

Memory Size

4 GB

24 GB

VRAM (MB)

4,096

24,576 +500.0%

Memory Type

GDDR6

Memory Bus

64 bit

384 bit

Bandwidth

112.0 GB/s

768.0 GB/s

Cache

L1 Cache

—

128 KB (per SM)

L2 Cache

4 MB

6 MB

Performance

Pixel Rate

65.60 GPixel/s

162.7 GPixel/s

Texture Rate

131.2 GTexel/s

433.9 GTexel/s

FP32 (TFLOPS)

4.198 TFLOPS

27.77 TFLOPS

FP64 (TFLOPS)

1,049.6 GFLOPS (1:4)

433.9 GFLOPS (1:64)

FP16 (TFLOPS)

8.397 TFLOPS (2:1)

27.77 TFLOPS (1:1)

AI/RT

RT Cores

64 +700.0%

Tensor Cores

—

256

XMX Cores

128

—

Power

TDP

35 W

230 W

TDP (W)

230 +557.1%

Suggested PSU

—

550 W

Power Connectors

—

1x 8-pin

Architecture

Xe-HPG

Ampere

GPU Name

DG2-128

GA102

Generation

Alchemist (Arc 3 Mobile)

Workstation Ampere (Ax000)

Process Size

6 nm

8 nm

Transistors

7,200 million

28,300 million

Die Size

157 mm²

628 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Samsung

Density

45.9M / mm²

45.1M / mm²

API Support

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

OpenGL

4.6

Vulkan

1.4

OpenCL

3.0

CUDA

—

8.6

Shader Model

6.6

6.8

Physical

Slot Width

IGP

Dual-slot

Length

—

267 mm 10.5 inches

Height

—

112 mm 4.4 inches

Outputs

Portable Device Dependent

4x DisplayPort 1.4a

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x8

PCIe 4.0 x16

Other

Production

End-of-life

Predecessor

—

Quadro Turing

Successor

—

Workstation Ada

View Arc A370M Details View RTX A5000 Details

GPU Comparison

Intel Arc A370M

RTX A5000

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

Analysis: Intel Arc A370M vs NVIDIA RTX A5000

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

Related Graphics Cards

Related Comparisons