GPU Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon RX 9060

CORE STATE Navi 44
VRAM 8 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2990 MHz
TDP 132 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 4.0
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

RTX A4500

CORE STATE GA102
VRAM 20 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1650 MHz
TDP 200 W
BUS WIDTH 320 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ampere
nm
PROCESS 8 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2021

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
3,322
3,196
geekbench_opencl
88,725
141,837
geekbench_vulkan
39,586
129,980

Analysis: AMD Radeon RX 9060 vs NVIDIA RTX A4500

If gaming capability is so tightly competitive, the evaluation between the NVIDIA RTX A4500 and AMD Radeon RX 9060 gets increasingly interesting. Each graphics cards swap leads in diverse benchmarks. The aggregate outcome is one of impressive equality. None of the emerges as a definite winner. The selection relies on individual needs.

Instead of dwelling on slight frame rate advantages, future buyers could weigh secondary factors. TDP, cooling, materials, and after-sales quality frequently are important larger than minor benchmark gaps. These variables can sway the choice. Think past just performance. This whole picture is important.

Playing games results also reveal matched performance between the NVIDIA RTX A4500 and AMD Radeon RX 9060. Performance differences usually remain inside 5-10%. This slight variations are hardly visible during real gameplay. Each graphics cards provide capable frame rates. Those who game should choose confidently between the options.

Ultimately: the NVIDIA RTX A4500 and AMD Radeon RX 9060 are evenly balanced. Neither earns a undisputed endorsement over the rival. Allow value and software factors guide your eventual selection. Each cards will fulfill you capably. This is a no-lose decision.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
RX 9060
RTX A4500
Core Specs
Shading Units
1,792
7,168 +300.0%
Shaders
1,792
7,168 +300.0%
TMUs
112
224 +100.0%
ROPs
64
96 +50.0%
Compute Units
28
SM Count
56
Clocks
Base Clock
1700 MHz
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
2990 MHz
1650 MHz
Game Clock
2400 MHz
Memory Clock
2518 MHz 20.1 Gbps effective
2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
8 GB
20 GB
VRAM (MB)
8,192
20,480 +150.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
128 bit
320 bit
Bandwidth
322.3 GB/s
640.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
4 MB
6 MB
L3 Cache
32 MB
L0 Cache
32 KB per WGP
Performance
Pixel Rate
191.4 GPixel/s
158.4 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
334.9 GTexel/s
369.6 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
21.43 TFLOPS
23.65 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
669.8 GFLOPS (1:32)
369.6 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
42.86 TFLOPS (2:1)
23.65 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
28
56 +100.0%
Tensor Cores
224
Matrix Cores
56
Power
TDP
132 W
200 W
TDP (W)
132
200 +51.5%
Suggested PSU
300 W
550 W
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
1x 8-pin
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 4.0
Ampere
GPU Name
Navi 44
GA102
Codename
Strix Point
Generation
Navi IV (RX 9000)
Workstation Ampere (Ax000)
Process Size
4 nm
8 nm
Transistors
29,700 million
28,300 million
Die Size
199 mm²
628 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Samsung
Density
149.2M / mm²
45.1M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.2
3.0
CUDA
8.6
Shader Model
6.8
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
Dual-slot
Dual-slot
Length
267 mm 10.5 inches
Height
112 mm 4.4 inches
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1b2x DisplayPort 2.1a
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
PCIe 4.0 x16
Other
Production
Active
End-of-life
Predecessor
Navi III
Quadro Turing
Successor
Workstation Ada
View Radeon RX 9060 Details View RTX A4500 Details