GPU Comparison

Intel
GPU

Intel Arc A350M

CORE STATE DG2-128
VRAM 4 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2200 MHz
TDP 25 W
BUS WIDTH 64 bit
ARCHITECTURE Xe-HPG
nm
PROCESS 6 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2022
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

RTX A4000

CORE STATE GA104
VRAM 16 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1560 MHz
TDP 140 W
BUS WIDTH 256 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ampere
nm
PROCESS 8 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2021

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl
24,546
105,868
geekbench_vulkan
24,747
127,645
3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
N/A
2,604
passmark_directx_10
N/A
126
passmark_directx_11
N/A
158
passmark_directx_12
N/A
72
passmark_directx_9
N/A
240
passmark_g2d
N/A
1,024
passmark_g3d
N/A
19,459
passmark_gpu_compute
N/A
9,760

Analysis: Intel Arc A350M vs NVIDIA RTX A4000

Reviewing the test figures for the NVIDIA RTX A4000 and GeForce Arc A350M, a distinct picture emerges. the NVIDIA RTX A4000 steadily provides stronger FPS in this testing. The rendering advantage ranges from noticeable to remarkable depending on the individual title. Such reliability speaks to underlying architectural superiority. Users valuing rendering performance will pay attention.

Game performance benchmarks across diverse titles steadily favor the NVIDIA RTX A4000. From esports genres to heavy productions, the NVIDIA RTX A4000 preserves its lead. This frame rate consistency over multiple workloads shows fundamental architectural advantages. Users might expect capable frame rates regardless of game type. This versatility is remarkable.

Gaming performance across diverse scenarios reliably advantage the NVIDIA RTX A4000. From competitive scenarios to heavy titles, the NVIDIA RTX A4000 holds its edge. This gaming steadiness across various titles demonstrates fundamental technical superiority. Users will count on excellent frame rates irrespective of game type. This adaptability is notable.

For those weighing a buying selection, the NVIDIA RTX A4000 stands as the preferred option. Its steady frame rate superiority over GeForce Arc A350M renders it the smarter investment for enthusiast buyers. Factor in your specific requirements, but this benchmarks guides toward the NVIDIA RTX A4000. Make an educated selection. The frame rate margin is tangible and notable.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
A350M
RTX A4000
Core Specs
Shading Units
768
6,144 +700.0%
Shaders
768
6,144 +700.0%
TMUs
48
192 +300.0%
ROPs
24
96 +300.0%
SM Count
48
Execution Units
96
Clocks
Base Clock
1150 MHz
735 MHz
Boost Clock
2200 MHz
1560 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz 14 Gbps effective
1750 MHz 14 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
4 GB
16 GB
VRAM (MB)
4,096
16,384 +300.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
64 bit
256 bit
Bandwidth
112.0 GB/s
448.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
4 MB
4 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
52.80 GPixel/s
149.8 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
105.6 GTexel/s
299.5 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
3.379 TFLOPS
19.17 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
844.8 GFLOPS (1:4)
299.5 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
6.758 TFLOPS (2:1)
19.17 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
6
48 +700.0%
Tensor Cores
192
XMX Cores
96
Power
TDP
25 W
140 W
TDP (W)
25
140 +460.0%
Suggested PSU
300 W
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Architecture
Architecture
Xe-HPG
Ampere
GPU Name
DG2-128
GA104
Generation
Alchemist (Arc 3 Mobile)
Workstation Ampere (Ax000)
Process Size
6 nm
8 nm
Transistors
7,200 million
17,400 million
Die Size
157 mm²
392 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Samsung
Density
45.9M / mm²
44.4M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
8.6
Shader Model
6.6
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
Single-slot
Length
241 mm 9.5 inches
Height
112 mm 4.4 inches
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 4.0 x16
Other
Production
End-of-life
End-of-life
Predecessor
Quadro Turing
Successor
Workstation Ada
View Arc A350M Details View RTX A4000 Details