GPU Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon 760M

CORE STATE Phoenix
VRAM System Shared
CLOCK SPEED 2599 MHz
TDP 15 W
BUS WIDTH System Shared
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 3.0
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

RTX A400

CORE STATE GA107
VRAM 4 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1762 MHz
TDP 50 W
BUS WIDTH 64 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ampere
nm
PROCESS 8 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
400
N/A
geekbench_opencl
20,255
22,844
geekbench_vulkan
30,336
22,237

Analysis: AMD Radeon 760M vs NVIDIA RTX A400

During this graphics card comparison, GeForce AMD Radeon 760M proves its superiority obviously. Whether you're creating content at 4K, GeForce AMD Radeon 760M reliably outperforms Radeon NVIDIA RTX A400 by significant margins. The performance difference grows notably larger at higher quality levels. This video card executes resource-hungry titles with grace. The architectural superiority are evident.

This video memory superiority of GeForce AMD Radeon 760M gets particularly important at increased resolutions. High resolution workloads consumes considerable graphics memory, and GeForce AMD Radeon 760M delivers more capacity. This translates into better frame rates in memory-intensive workloads. Next-gen titles might continually demand more graphics memory. This advantage increases over generations.

When people considering a acquisition choice, GeForce AMD Radeon 760M appears as the suggested option. The dependable frame rate lead over Radeon NVIDIA RTX A400 positions it the better selection for demanding buyers. Factor in your particular workloads, though this evidence points toward GeForce AMD Radeon 760M. Form an educated determination. This benchmark gap is real and considerable.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
760M
RTX A400
Core Specs
Shading Units
512
768 +50.0%
Shaders
512
768 +50.0%
TMUs
32
24 -25.0%
ROPs
16
16 0.0%
Compute Units
8
SM Count
6
Clocks
Base Clock
800 MHz
1417 MHz
Boost Clock
2599 MHz
1762 MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared
1500 MHz 12 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
System Shared
4 GB
VRAM (MB)
4,096
Memory Type
System Shared
GDDR6
Memory Bus
System Shared
64 bit
Bandwidth
System Dependent
96.00 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
L0 Cache
32 KB per WGP
Performance
Pixel Rate
41.58 GPixel/s
28.19 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
83.17 GTexel/s
42.29 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
5.323 TFLOPS
2.706 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
332.7 GFLOPS (1:16)
42.29 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
10.65 TFLOPS (2:1)
2.706 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
8
6 -25.0%
Tensor Cores
24
Power
TDP
15 W
50 W
TDP (W)
15
50 +233.3%
Suggested PSU
250 W
Power Connectors
None
None
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
Ampere
GPU Name
Phoenix
GA107
Generation
Navi III IGP (Phoenix)
Workstation Ampere (Ax000)
Process Size
4 nm
8 nm
Transistors
25,390 million
8,700 million
Die Size
178 mm²
200 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Samsung
Density
142.6M / mm²
43.5M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.1
3.0
CUDA
8.6
Shader Model
6.8
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
Single-slot
Length
163 mm 6.4 inches
Height
69 mm 2.7 inches
Outputs
Motherboard Dependent
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 4.0 x8
Other
Production
Active
Active
Predecessor
Navi II IGP
Quadro Turing
Successor
Workstation Ada
View Radeon 760M Details View RTX A400 Details