GPU Comparison

NVIDIA

GEFORCE

NVIDIA RTX A2000

CORE STATE GA106

VRAM 6 GB

CLOCK SPEED 1200 MHz

TDP 70 W

BUS WIDTH 192 bit

ARCHITECTURE Ampere

PROCESS 8 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2021

NVIDIA

GEFORCE

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell

CORE STATE GB203

VRAM 24 GB

CLOCK SPEED 2055 MHz

TDP 140 W

BUS WIDTH 192 bit

ARCHITECTURE Blackwell 2.0

PROCESS 5 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12

1,345

4,648

geekbench_opencl

67,695

N/A

geekbench_vulkan

69,089

194,168

passmark_directx_10

N/A

173

passmark_directx_11

N/A

276

passmark_directx_12

N/A

passmark_directx_9

N/A

354

passmark_g2d

N/A

1,265

passmark_g3d

N/A

28,427

passmark_gpu_compute

N/A

14,805

Analysis: NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell

Examining the test results for NVIDIA RTX A2000 and NVIDIA NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell, a pattern of competitive throughput emerges. No card leads steadily over most games. The trading of leads implies core parity. Buyers face a genuine selection in this matchup. The two options achieve strong visual results.

Over fixating on slight FPS gains, future buyers can weigh additional elements. thermal performance, cooling, materials, and support options usually are important larger than marginal frame rate gaps. The factors could influence the scales. Evaluate beyond simply performance. This entire value proposition is important.

At the end of the day, consumers can pick based on price as opposed to absolute performance solely. Each NVIDIA RTX A2000 and NVIDIA NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell deliver capable rendering capability for their intended categories. This selection depends on individual requirements. Either choice is good. You shouldn't go badly between them.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

RTX A2000

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell

Core Specs

Shading Units

3,328

8,960 +169.2%

Shaders

3,328

8,960 +169.2%

TMUs

104

280 +169.2%

ROPs

96 +100.0%

SM Count

70 +169.2%

Clocks

Base Clock

562 MHz

1230 MHz

Boost Clock

1200 MHz

2055 MHz

Memory Clock

1500 MHz 12 Gbps effective

1750 MHz 28 Gbps effective

Memory

Memory Size

6 GB

24 GB

VRAM (MB)

6,144

24,576 +300.0%

Memory Type

GDDR6

GDDR7

Memory Bus

192 bit

Bandwidth

288.0 GB/s

672.0 GB/s

Cache

L1 Cache

128 KB (per SM)

L2 Cache

3 MB

48 MB

Performance

Pixel Rate

57.60 GPixel/s

197.3 GPixel/s

Texture Rate

124.8 GTexel/s

575.4 GTexel/s

FP32 (TFLOPS)

7.987 TFLOPS

36.83 TFLOPS

FP64 (TFLOPS)

124.8 GFLOPS (1:64)

575.4 GFLOPS (1:64)

FP16 (TFLOPS)

7.987 TFLOPS (1:1)

36.83 TFLOPS (1:1)

AI/RT

RT Cores

70 +169.2%

Tensor Cores

104

280 +169.2%

Power

TDP

70 W

140 W

TDP (W)

140 +100.0%

Suggested PSU

250 W

300 W

Power Connectors

None

1x 16-pin

Architecture

Ampere

Blackwell 2.0

GPU Name

GA106

GB203

Generation

Workstation Ampere (Ax000)

Blackwell PRO W (x000)

Process Size

8 nm

5 nm

Transistors

12,000 million

45,600 million

Die Size

276 mm²

378 mm²

Foundry

Samsung

TSMC

Density

43.5M / mm²

120.6M / mm²

API Support

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

OpenGL

4.6

Vulkan

1.4

OpenCL

3.0

CUDA

8.6

12.0

Shader Model

6.8

6.9

Physical

Slot Width

Dual-slot

Single-slot

Length

167 mm 6.6 inches

241 mm 9.5 inches

Height

69 mm 2.7 inches

111 mm 4.4 inches

Outputs

4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

4x DisplayPort 2.1b

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x16

PCIe 5.0 x16

Other

Launch Price

449 USD

—

Production

End-of-life

Active

Predecessor

Quadro Turing

Workstation Ada

Successor

Workstation Ada

—

View RTX A2000 Details View RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell Details

GPU Comparison

NVIDIA RTX A2000

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

Analysis: NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

Related Graphics Cards

Related Comparisons