NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Comparison

The Verdict

The database places the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell and the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile in very different performance tiers. The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is a desktop-class workstation card built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, while the RTX A2000 Mobile is an end-of-life laptop GPU from the Ampere generation. Their average benchmark scores tell the story: the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell records an average score of 16,408, while the RTX A2000 Mobile averages 13,821 across its suite. That is a gap of roughly 2,587 points, or about 18.7% in favor of the desktop card. However, this comparison is not straightforward because the benchmark sets differ: the RTX PRO 6000 was evaluated with a single DirectX 12 test, while the RTX A2000 Mobile has results across OpenCL, Vulkan, and multiple DirectX versions.

The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell sits at the 59th percentile among all GPUs, placing it just above the RTX A2000 Mobile, which is at the 55th percentile. In its nearest rival group, the RTX PRO 6000 is effectively tied with the AMD Radeon PRO W7500, which scores 16,415, a delta of 0%. It also edges out the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT by 0.3% and the AMD Radeon Pro 5600M by 0.4%. The only GPU in its immediate vicinity that beats it is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2, which scores 16,504, putting the RTX PRO 6000 0.6% behind. For the RTX A2000 Mobile, the nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon 660M at 13,812 (0.1% higher), the AMD Radeon RX 570X at 13,871 (0.4% higher), and the NVIDIA Tesla K10 at 14,029 (1.5% higher). Interestingly, the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT scores lower at 13,745, meaning the RTX A2000 Mobile holds a 0.6% advantage over that card in the database.

Who should pick which? The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is the obvious choice for fixed workstations requiring maximum compute throughput, 96 GB of memory, and the latest Blackwell 2.0 features. The RTX A2000 Mobile, despite being end-of-life, remains relevant for portable systems where 95 W power draw and mobile integration matter more than raw speed. The data shows no shared head-to-head benchmark, so the comparison rests on their respective average scores, architectural traits, and the specific workloads each was tested under.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell wins decisively on raw compute density and memory capacity. Its 24,064 shading units dwarf the RTX A2000 Mobile's 2,560, and its 752 tensor cores versus 80 tensor cores indicate a massive lead in AI-accelerated workloads. The FP32 throughput is 126.0 TFLOPS for the RTX PRO 6000, compared to 8.637 TFLOPS for the RTX A2000 Mobile, a difference of roughly 14.6 times. This makes the desktop card suitable for simulation, rendering, and deep learning training where floating-point performance is the bottleneck. The memory subsystem reinforces this: 96 GB of GDDR7 at 1.79 TB/s bandwidth versus 4 GB of GDDR6 at 192.0 GB/s. For datasets that exceed 4 GB, the RTX A2000 Mobile simply cannot hold the working set, while the RTX PRO 6000 has headroom for multi-model or multi-frame workflows.

The RTX A2000 Mobile wins on mobility and power efficiency relative to its footprint. It is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) with no power connectors, drawing up to 95 W, whereas the RTX PRO 6000 is a dual-slot card requiring a 1000 W suggested power supply and a 16-pin connector. The mobile card's 8 nm Samsung process and 200 mm² die size, with 8,700 million transistors, make it a compact solution for laptops. Its display outputs are listed as "Portable Device Dependent," meaning it adapts to the host system, unlike the RTX PRO 6000's fixed 4x DisplayPort 2.1b outputs. In the benchmark data, the RTX A2000 Mobile shows strengths in legacy DirectX tests: it scores 115 in PassMark DirectX 9, 68 in DirectX 11, and 57 in DirectX 10, with a lower 47 in DirectX 12. Its PassMark G3D score of 9,611 and compute score of 4,334 indicate reasonable general-purpose performance for a mobile part. The RTX PRO 6000, by contrast, has only one recorded benchmark, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, where it scores 16,408.

The data suggests the RTX A2000 Mobile is better suited for portable CAD, light 3D modeling, and legacy API compatibility, while the RTX PRO 6000 is built for heavy compute, high-resolution rendering, and future-proof workloads. The RTX A2000 Mobile's nearest rival, the AMD Radeon 660M, is within 0.1%, meaning the mobile card is competitive with integrated graphics of its era. The RTX PRO 6000, however, trades blows with desktop GPUs like the RX 5700 XT and RTX 5090 D V2, placing it in a much higher performance class.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from entirely different architectural generations. The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell uses the GB202 chip on a 5 nm TSMC process, with 92,200 million transistors on a 750 mm² die. This yields a transistor density of 122.9 million per square millimeter. The RTX A2000 Mobile uses the GA107 chip on an 8 nm Samsung process, with 8,700 million transistors on a 200 mm² die, giving a density of 43.5 million per square millimeter. The node advantage alone explains much of the performance gap: the 5 nm process allows for more transistors in a larger area, enabling higher clock speeds and more compute units.

Clock speeds differ significantly. The RTX PRO 6000 has a base clock of 1590 MHz and a boost clock of 2617 MHz, while the RTX A2000 Mobile operates at 1215 MHz base and 1687 MHz boost. The RTX PRO 6000's memory runs at 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective data rate on GDDR7, whereas the RTX A2000 Mobile uses 1500 MHz with 12 Gbps effective on GDDR6. The memory bus widths are 512-bit versus 128-bit, which combines with the memory type difference to produce the bandwidth gap: 1.79 TB/s versus 192.0 GB/s.

Compute resources are vastly different. The RTX PRO 6000 has 752 texture mapping units (TMUs) and 192 raster operation units (ROPs), while the RTX A2000 Mobile has 80 TMUs and 48 ROPs. Ray tracing cores number 188 for the RTX PRO 6000 versus 20 for the RTX A2000 Mobile. Pixel rate is 502.5 GPixel/s for the desktop card versus 80.98 GPixel/s for the mobile card, and texture rate is 1,968.0 GTexel/s versus 135.0 GTexel/s. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so API compatibility is identical, but the underlying hardware capabilities are generations apart.

The RTX PRO 6000 is a dual-slot card measuring 304 mm in length, 137 mm in height, and 40 mm in width, requiring a 1000 W power supply. The RTX A2000 Mobile has no dimensions listed, as it is an IGP soldered into laptops, and it has no power connectors. The RTX PRO 6000 uses PCIe 5.0 x16, while the RTX A2000 Mobile uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The desktop card has 4x DisplayPort 2.1b outputs for multi-monitor setups; the mobile card's outputs depend on the portable device. Production status also differs: the RTX PRO 6000 is active, released in March 2025, while the RTX A2000 Mobile is end-of-life, released in April 2021, with the Ada-MW generation as its successor.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher raw performance in the database?

A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell has an average benchmark score of 16,408, compared to the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile's 13,821. That is an 18.7% advantage for the desktop card.

Q: How does the RTX PRO 6000 compare to its closest competitor?

A: The RTX PRO 6000 scores 16,408, which is within 0% of the AMD Radeon PRO W7500 (16,415), 0.3% above the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT (16,361), and 0.6% below the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 (16,504).

Q: What is the memory capacity difference?

A: The RTX PRO 6000 has 96 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus, while the RTX A2000 Mobile has 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus. Memory bandwidth is 1.79 TB/s versus 192.0 GB/s.

Q: Is the RTX A2000 Mobile still in production?

A: No, the RTX A2000 Mobile is marked as end-of-life in the database. Its successor is the Ada-MW generation. The RTX PRO 6000 is listed as active.

Q: Which GPU supports newer PCIe technology?

A: The RTX PRO 6000 uses PCIe 5.0 x16, while the RTX A2000 Mobile uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

Q: Do both GPUs support the same graphics APIs?

A: Yes, both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The RTX PRO 6000, however, has significantly more hardware resources for these APIs, including 188 ray tracing cores versus 20.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database does not contain any shared head-to-head benchmark results between the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell and the RTX A2000 Mobile. This means the comparison must be built from their individual benchmark suites and average scores. The RTX PRO 6000's only recorded benchmark is 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, where it scores 16,408. This places it at the 59th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon PRO W7500, scores 16,415, a negligible 0% delta. The RTX PRO 6000 also beats the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT (16,361) by 0.3% and the AMD Radeon Pro 5600M (16,351) by 0.4%. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 (16,504) is the only card in this group ahead of it, by 0.6%.

The RTX A2000 Mobile has a broader benchmark profile. Its highest scores come from Geekbench OpenCL at 56,518 and Geekbench Vulkan at 53,146. In PassMark tests, it scores 115 in DirectX 9, 68 in DirectX 11, 57 in DirectX 10, and 47 in DirectX 12. Its PassMark G2D score is 491, G3D is 9,611, and GPU compute is 4,334. The average of these scores is 13,821, placing it at the 55th percentile. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the AMD Radeon 660M (13,812) is 0.1% higher, the AMD Radeon RX 570X (13,871) is 0.4% higher, and the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT (13,745) is 0.6% lower. The NVIDIA Tesla K10 (14,029) is 1.5% higher.

When interpreting these numbers, the RTX PRO 6000's single benchmark is a modern DirectX 12 workload, which favors its Blackwell architecture's latest features. The RTX A2000 Mobile's scores span legacy APIs, where it performs better in DirectX 9 (115) than in DirectX 12 (47), indicating that its Ampere architecture was optimized for older pipelines or that driver maturity favors those paths. The FP32 compute figures reinforce the divide: 126.0 TFLOPS for the RTX PRO 6000 versus 8.637 TFLOPS for the RTX A2000 Mobile. Texture rate is 1,968.0 GTexel/s versus 135.0 GTexel/s, and pixel rate is 502.5 GPixel/s versus 80.98 GPixel/s. These are not close contests; the RTX PRO 6000 leads by over an order of magnitude in every raw throughput metric.

The RTX A2000 Mobile's strongest relative showing is in its OpenCL and Vulkan Geekbench results, which are not directly comparable to the RTX PRO 6000's 3DMark score. However, the average benchmark score accounts for the different test sets, and even with that aggregation, the RTX PRO 6000 holds an 18.7% lead. The RTX A2000 Mobile's nearest rival, the AMD Radeon 660M, is effectively a tie, suggesting that the mobile card's performance is typical of its class. The RTX PRO 6000's nearest rival, the AMD Radeon PRO W7500, is also a tie, but at a much higher absolute score. The data shows that the RTX PRO 6000 is a top-tier workstation GPU, while the RTX A2000 Mobile is a competent but dated mobile solution. For users needing the highest compute and memory capacity, the RTX PRO 6000 is the clear winner; for portable systems where power draw and size are constraints, the RTX A2000 Mobile remains a viable option despite its end-of-life status.