GPU Comparison

NVIDIA
GEFORCE

NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB

CORE STATE GA106
VRAM 12 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1200 MHz
TDP 70 W
BUS WIDTH 192 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ampere
nm
PROCESS 8 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2021
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

T600

CORE STATE TU117
VRAM 4 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1335 MHz
TDP 40 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE Turing
nm
PROCESS 12 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2021

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
1,309
N/A
geekbench_opencl
66,876
27,875
geekbench_vulkan
N/A
25,580
passmark_directx_10
N/A
32
passmark_directx_11
N/A
49
passmark_directx_12
N/A
25
passmark_directx_9
N/A
114
passmark_g2d
N/A
756
passmark_g3d
N/A
6,479
passmark_gpu_compute
N/A
2,402

Analysis: NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB vs NVIDIA T600

If analyzing NVIDIA T600 by NVIDIA against NVIDIA NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB graphics card, the benchmark margin becomes clearly noticeable. NVIDIA T600 by NVIDIA takes the lead in virtually most benchmark we ran. The delta is substantial sufficiently to impact everyday rendering experiences. Users will feel better gameplay. The verdict is clear.

The memory advantage of NVIDIA T600 by NVIDIA turns particularly relevant at higher settings. High resolution gaming consumes considerable video memory, and NVIDIA T600 by NVIDIA has additional headroom. This translates into better gameplay in VRAM-hungry titles. Future software should only need additional VRAM. This superiority increases over generations.

NVIDIA NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB graphics card encounters issues to match NVIDIA T600 by NVIDIA's absolute throughput. In price-conscious buyers, NVIDIA NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB graphics card may nonetheless represent reasonable capability, yet those demanding maximum experience should look toward NVIDIA T600 by NVIDIA. This benchmark margin is sufficiently large to ignore. Demanding games notably reveal this difference. This investment returns benefits in frame rates.

The bottom line: NVIDIA T600 by NVIDIA secures this battle decisively. Buyers valuing visual throughput should seriously choose NVIDIA T600 by NVIDIA over NVIDIA NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB graphics card. This test evidence demonstrates this recommendation. The workloads will execute considerably more fluidly. It's a definite winner in this tier.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
RTX A2000 12 GB
T600
Core Specs
Shading Units
3,328
640 -80.8%
Shaders
3,328
640 -80.8%
TMUs
104
40 -61.5%
ROPs
48
32 -33.3%
SM Count
26
10 -61.5%
Clocks
Base Clock
562 MHz
735 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
1335 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz 12 Gbps effective
1250 MHz 10 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
12 GB
4 GB
VRAM (MB)
12,288
4,096 -66.7%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
192 bit
128 bit
Bandwidth
288.0 GB/s
160.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
3 MB
1024 KB
Performance
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
42.72 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
53.40 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
7.987 TFLOPS
1.709 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
124.8 GFLOPS (1:64)
53.40 GFLOPS (1:32)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
7.987 TFLOPS (1:1)
3.418 TFLOPS (2:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
26
Tensor Cores
104
Power
TDP
70 W
40 W
TDP (W)
70
40 -42.9%
Suggested PSU
250 W
200 W
Power Connectors
None
None
Architecture
Architecture
Ampere
Turing
GPU Name
GA106
TU117
Generation
Workstation Ampere (Ax000)
Quadro Turing (Tx000)
Process Size
8 nm
12 nm
Transistors
12,000 million
4,700 million
Die Size
276 mm²
200 mm²
Foundry
Samsung
TSMC
Density
43.5M / mm²
23.5M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 (12_1)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
8.6
7.5
Shader Model
6.8
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
Dual-slot
Single-slot
Length
167 mm 6.6 inches
Height
69 mm 2.7 inches
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Other
Launch Price
449 USD
Production
End-of-life
End-of-life
Predecessor
Quadro Turing
Quadro Volta
Successor
Workstation Ada
Workstation Ampere
View RTX A2000 12 GB Details View T600 Details