GPU Comparison

NVIDIA
GEFORCE

NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB

CORE STATE GA106
VRAM 12 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1200 MHz
TDP 70 W
BUS WIDTH 192 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ampere
nm
PROCESS 8 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2021
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

T400

CORE STATE TU117
VRAM 2 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1425 MHz
TDP 30 W
BUS WIDTH 64 bit
ARCHITECTURE Turing
nm
PROCESS 12 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2021

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
1,309
N/A
geekbench_opencl
66,876
17,039
geekbench_vulkan
N/A
15,976

Analysis: NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB vs NVIDIA T400

Throughout this graphics card battle, NVIDIA's NVIDIA T400 graphics shows its leadership convincingly. Whether you're creating content at 1080p, NVIDIA's NVIDIA T400 graphics reliably beats NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB (NVIDIA) by notable margins. This performance delta increases notably greater at increased resolutions. This graphics card handles demanding games with grace. The engineering benefits are clear.

NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB (NVIDIA) struggles to keep up with NVIDIA's NVIDIA T400 graphics's pure performance. In cost-sensitive consumers, NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB (NVIDIA) can nevertheless offer adequate performance, but users seeking maximum experience would gravitate toward NVIDIA's NVIDIA T400 graphics. This gaming gap is sufficiently substantial to overlook. Demanding workloads especially demonstrate this margin. The price gap delivers dividends in performance.

Playing games results across various games consistently benefit NVIDIA's NVIDIA T400 graphics. Whether it's fast-paced games to heavy productions, NVIDIA's NVIDIA T400 graphics holds its edge. The performance consistency over diverse scenarios demonstrates underlying technical benefits. Gamers will anticipate solid performance irrespective of game type. This flexibility is notable.

For users considering a investment determination, NVIDIA's NVIDIA T400 graphics comes out as the recommended option. Its consistent frame rate superiority over NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB (NVIDIA) positions it the wiser investment for gaming-focused consumers. Evaluate your individual needs, yet this benchmarks guides toward NVIDIA's NVIDIA T400 graphics. Make an informed determination. The benchmark gap is measurable and meaningful.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
RTX A2000 12 GB
T400
Core Specs
Shading Units
3,328
384 -88.5%
Shaders
3,328
384 -88.5%
TMUs
104
24 -76.9%
ROPs
48
16 -66.7%
SM Count
26
6 -76.9%
Clocks
Base Clock
562 MHz
420 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
1425 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz 12 Gbps effective
1250 MHz 10 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
12 GB
2 GB
VRAM (MB)
12,288
2,048 -83.3%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
192 bit
64 bit
Bandwidth
288.0 GB/s
80.00 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
3 MB
1024 KB
Performance
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
22.80 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
34.20 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
7.987 TFLOPS
1,094.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
124.8 GFLOPS (1:64)
34.20 GFLOPS (1:32)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
7.987 TFLOPS (1:1)
2.189 TFLOPS (2:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
26
Tensor Cores
104
Power
TDP
70 W
30 W
TDP (W)
70
30 -57.1%
Suggested PSU
250 W
200 W
Power Connectors
None
None
Architecture
Architecture
Ampere
Turing
GPU Name
GA106
TU117
Generation
Workstation Ampere (Ax000)
Quadro Turing (Tx000)
Process Size
8 nm
12 nm
Transistors
12,000 million
4,700 million
Die Size
276 mm²
200 mm²
Foundry
Samsung
TSMC
Density
43.5M / mm²
23.5M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 (12_1)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
8.6
7.5
Shader Model
6.8
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
Dual-slot
Single-slot
Length
167 mm 6.6 inches
Height
69 mm 2.7 inches
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Other
Launch Price
449 USD
Production
End-of-life
End-of-life
Predecessor
Quadro Turing
Quadro Volta
Successor
Workstation Ada
Workstation Ampere
View RTX A2000 12 GB Details View T400 Details