GPU Comparison

NVIDIA
GEFORCE

NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB

CORE STATE GA106
VRAM 12 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1200 MHz
TDP 70 W
BUS WIDTH 192 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ampere
nm
PROCESS 8 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2021
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

RTX A400

CORE STATE GA107
VRAM 4 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1762 MHz
TDP 50 W
BUS WIDTH 64 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ampere
nm
PROCESS 8 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
1,309
N/A
geekbench_opencl
66,876
22,844
geekbench_vulkan
N/A
22,237

Analysis: NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB vs NVIDIA RTX A400

Reviewing the test data for NVIDIA NVIDIA RTX A400 GPU and the NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB card from NVIDIA, a clear story develops. NVIDIA NVIDIA RTX A400 GPU repeatedly delivers better performance in this testing. This speed advantage extends from substantial to exceptional relative to the individual scenario. This consistency speaks to inherent architectural advantages. Buyers prioritizing graphics throughput would pay attention.

For hardware ray tracing, NVIDIA NVIDIA RTX A400 GPU leaps even more beyond of the NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB card from NVIDIA. The specialized accelerators execute intensive shadow computations considerably more effectively. Players looking for cutting-edge graphics will certainly pick NVIDIA NVIDIA RTX A400 GPU. The ray tracing capability is significant. Current releases progressively leverage real-time ray tracing capabilities.

When it comes to hardware ray tracing, NVIDIA NVIDIA RTX A400 GPU moves considerably in front of the NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB card from NVIDIA. Its hardware units process demanding global illumination effects considerably more capably. Users wanting cutting-edge graphics will strongly favor NVIDIA NVIDIA RTX A400 GPU. The ray tracing performance is considerable. Contemporary titles more and more use hardware RT features.

the NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB card from NVIDIA cannot be ignored altogether, yet its gaming gap versus NVIDIA NVIDIA RTX A400 GPU is difficult to ignore. For value-focused buyers, the NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB card from NVIDIA may nevertheless represent value when its reduced price adjusts for its lower performance. But, for maximum gaming power, NVIDIA NVIDIA RTX A400 GPU stands as the obvious champion. The verdict is clear. Speed seekers would gravitate toward NVIDIA NVIDIA RTX A400 GPU.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
RTX A2000 12 GB
RTX A400
Core Specs
Shading Units
3,328
768 -76.9%
Shaders
3,328
768 -76.9%
TMUs
104
24 -76.9%
ROPs
48
16 -66.7%
SM Count
26
6 -76.9%
Clocks
Base Clock
562 MHz
1417 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
1762 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz 12 Gbps effective
1500 MHz 12 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
12 GB
4 GB
VRAM (MB)
12,288
4,096 -66.7%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
192 bit
64 bit
Bandwidth
288.0 GB/s
96.00 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
3 MB
2 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
28.19 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
42.29 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
7.987 TFLOPS
2.706 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
124.8 GFLOPS (1:64)
42.29 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
7.987 TFLOPS (1:1)
2.706 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
26
6 -76.9%
Tensor Cores
104
24 -76.9%
Power
TDP
70 W
50 W
TDP (W)
70
50 -28.6%
Suggested PSU
250 W
250 W
Power Connectors
None
None
Architecture
Architecture
Ampere
Ampere
GPU Name
GA106
GA107
Generation
Workstation Ampere (Ax000)
Workstation Ampere (Ax000)
Process Size
8 nm
8 nm
Transistors
12,000 million
8,700 million
Die Size
276 mm²
200 mm²
Foundry
Samsung
Samsung
Density
43.5M / mm²
43.5M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
8.6
8.6
Shader Model
6.8
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
Dual-slot
Single-slot
Length
167 mm 6.6 inches
163 mm 6.4 inches
Height
69 mm 2.7 inches
69 mm 2.7 inches
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
PCIe 4.0 x8
Other
Launch Price
449 USD
Production
End-of-life
Active
Predecessor
Quadro Turing
Quadro Turing
Successor
Workstation Ada
Workstation Ada
View RTX A2000 12 GB Details View RTX A400 Details