NVIDIA RTX A1000 vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

The Verdict

The database comparison between the NVIDIA RTX A1000 and the Lisuan Tech LX PRO presents a clear divergence in positioning. The RTX A1000 is an established, actively produced workstation card built on the Ampere architecture, with recorded benchmark scores placing it in the 79th percentile of all GPUs. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO, by contrast, is a newer entry with a 6 nm process node and a significantly larger memory pool, but it has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, resulting in a 50th percentile ranking and an average benchmark score of 0. The data does not support a direct performance comparison, as no head-to-head benchmark results exist.

The RTX A1000 is the only card in this comparison with verified performance data. Its recorded scores include 969 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 52078 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 49574 in Geekbench Vulkan. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no benchmark entries, so any claims about its real-world performance remain unverified. For users requiring immediate, measurable performance, the RTX A1000 is the only option with substantiated results. The LX PRO offers a larger memory configuration and higher theoretical compute figures, but these are unconfirmed by any recorded tests.

The RTX A1000's nearest rivals in the database, such as the NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB and the AMD Radeon RX 480, show that it operates within a tight performance band. Its average benchmark score of 34207 is within 0.2% of the RTX A2000 12 GB, within 0.2% of the Radeon RX 560 XT, and 0.6% ahead of the Radeon RX 480. The NVIDIA TITAN V is 0.4% ahead. This indicates the RTX A1000 is a mid-pack performer relative to its immediate competitors. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no such reference points, leaving its standing entirely undefined.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX A1000 wins in every category where data exists. It is the only card with benchmark scores, and those scores define its strengths. In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, it scores 969, which is a measure of DirectX 12 gaming and compute workload performance. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 52078 and the Vulkan score of 49574 indicate strong general-purpose compute capability across both API environments. These are the only wins recorded, and they belong exclusively to the RTX A1000.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no wins in any recorded benchmark category. Its specification sheet, however, suggests potential advantages in memory capacity and bandwidth. It offers 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The RTX A1000 provides 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 192.0 GB/s. The LX PRO also lists a higher pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s, compared to 46.78 GPixel/s and 105.3 GTexel/s for the RTX A1000. These figures are theoretical maximums, not measured results, but they indicate the LX PRO is designed for higher throughput in rasterization and texturing.

The RTX A1000 has a lower power requirement, with a 50 W TDP and no power connectors, while the LX PRO requires 225 W and a single 16-pin connector. This makes the RTX A1000 suitable for systems with a 250 W suggested PSU, whereas the LX PRO demands a 550 W suggested PSU. The RTX A1000 is also physically smaller, at 163 mm in length and 69 mm in height, compared to the LX PRO's 248 mm length and 118 mm height. The LX PRO is dual-slot, while the RTX A1000 is single-slot.

Architecture Differences

The two cards are built on fundamentally different architectures. The NVIDIA RTX A1000 uses the GA107 chip on the Ampere architecture, fabricated by Samsung on an 8 nm process. It contains 8,700 million transistors on a 200 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 43.5M per mm². Its base clock is 727 MHz, with a boost clock of 1462 MHz, and memory runs at 1500 MHz with 12 Gbps effective. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO uses a 7G105 chip on a TrueGPU architecture, fabricated by TSMC on a 6 nm process. Its transistor count and die size are listed as unknown, and its base and boost clocks are not specified. Memory runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective.

The RTX A1000 has 2304 shading units, 72 texture mapping units, and 32 raster output units. It includes 18 RT cores and 72 tensor cores, making it a fully featured Ampere workstation GPU with hardware ray tracing and AI acceleration. Its FP32 compute is 6.737 TFLOPS, and its FP16 compute matches at 6.737 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio. The LX PRO has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, but lists no RT cores or tensor cores. Its FP32 compute is 24.58 TFLOPS, and its FP16 compute is 49.15 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio. The LX PRO's compute figures are significantly higher, but the absence of RT and tensor core data leaves its feature set incomplete.

The RTX A1000 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The LX PRO supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3. Both cards use PCIe 4.0, but the RTX A1000 is x8 while the LX PRO is x16. Display outputs differ: the RTX A1000 has four mini-DisplayPort 1.4a connectors, while the LX PRO has four full-size DisplayPort 1.4a connectors. The RTX A1000 was released in April 2024, while the LX PRO is dated March 2026.

FAQ

Q: Which card has verified benchmark performance?

A: Only the NVIDIA RTX A1000 has recorded benchmark scores. It scores 969 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 52078 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 49574 in Geekbench Vulkan. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no benchmark entries in the database.

Q: How does the RTX A1000 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RTX A1000's average benchmark score is 34207. This is 0.2% higher than the NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB and the AMD Radeon RX 560 XT, 0.6% higher than the AMD Radeon RX 480, and 0.4% lower than the NVIDIA TITAN V.

Q: What are the memory differences between the two cards?

A: The RTX A1000 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 192.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Does the Lisuan Tech LX PRO support hardware ray tracing?

A: The LX PRO specification lists no RT cores. The RTX A1000 includes 18 RT cores, which support hardware ray tracing.

Q: What are the power requirements for each card?

A: The RTX A1000 has a 50 W TDP and requires no power connectors, with a suggested PSU of 250 W. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has a 225 W TDP and requires one 16-pin connector, with a suggested PSU of 550 W.

Q: Which card has a higher theoretical FP32 compute?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX PRO lists 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, while the NVIDIA RTX A1000 lists 6.737 TFLOPS FP32. The LX PRO's figure is approximately 3.6 times higher on paper.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

No head-to-head benchmark results exist between the NVIDIA RTX A1000 and the Lisuan Tech LX PRO. The database records zero wins for either card in this pairing. The RTX A1000, however, has standalone scores that can be interpreted against its nearest rivals. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 969 is the only DirectX 12 result available. In Geekbench OpenCL, it scores 52078, and in Geekbench Vulkan, it scores 49574. These results give the RTX A1000 an average benchmark score of 34207.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no benchmark scores, an average score of 0, and no nearest rivals listed. Its theoretical specifications, including 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 and 432.0 GB/s memory bandwidth, suggest it could outperform the RTX A1000 in raw compute and memory throughput, but the database contains no measurements to confirm this. The RTX A1000's recorded performance, by contrast, is fully documented and places it in the 79th percentile of all GPUs. The LX PRO's 50th percentile ranking is based on the absence of data rather than measured performance.

The RTX A1000's nearest rival comparisons provide context for its standing. It is 0.2% ahead of the RTX A2000 12 GB and the RX 560 XT, 0.6% ahead of the RX 480, and 0.4% behind the TITAN V. These margins are small, indicating that the RTX A1000 sits in a tightly contested performance cluster. The LX PRO has no such comparisons, leaving its relative position entirely unquantified.

For users relying on measured results, the RTX A1000 is the only card with data. Its 6.737 TFLOPS FP32 and 192.0 GB/s bandwidth are modest figures, but they are backed by real benchmark outcomes. The LX PRO's 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth are promising on paper, but without benchmark entries, they remain unverified specifications. The database shows one card with a complete performance profile and another with none.