NVIDIA RTX 6000D vs NVIDIA Tesla V100S PCIe 32 GB Comparison

NVIDIA’s RTX 6000D and Tesla V100S PCIe 32 GB occupy opposite ends of the company’s professional GPU spectrum, and the benchmark data reflects a generational chasm rather than a close contest. The RTX 6000D leads the V100S by 99.8% in the only shared benchmark, Geekbench OpenCL, with scores of 388,405 and 194,415 respectively. While both cards sit at the 98th percentile of all GPUs, that tie masks a fundamental difference: the RTX 6000D is an active, current-generation Blackwell part, while the V100S is an end-of-life Volta product from a prior era. The data shows the RTX 6000D is not merely faster—it redefines the performance class, while the V100S remains a capable but aging compute workhorse.

FAQ

Q: How much faster is the RTX 6000D than the Tesla V100S in Geekbench OpenCL?

A: The RTX 6000D scores 388,405 versus 194,415 for the V100S, a delta of 99.8%. This means the RTX 6000D delivers almost exactly double the OpenCL compute performance of the older card.

Q: Do both GPUs have the same average benchmark score?

A: No. The RTX 6000D averages 195,964 across its benchmark suite, while the V100S averages 194,415. The RTX 6000D leads by 0.8% in aggregate, though its OpenCL advantage is far larger.

Q: What are the memory configurations of each card?

A: The RTX 6000D ships with 84 GB of GDDR7 on a 448-bit bus, providing 1.40 TB/s of bandwidth. The V100S has 32 GB of HBM2 on a 4096-bit bus, delivering 1.13 TB/s.

Q: Which card has a higher transistor count?

A: The RTX 6000D uses the GB202 chip with 92,200 million transistors, while the V100S uses the GV100 with 21,100 million. The RTX 6000D packs over four times as many transistors despite a smaller die.

Q: Is the Tesla V100S still in production?

A: No. The V100S is marked as end-of-life in the data, with a release date of 2019-11-25. The RTX 6000D is listed as active, released on 2025-07-13.

Q: How does the RTX 6000D compare to other rivals beyond the V100S?

A: The RTX 6000D’s nearest rival is the A100 PCIe 80 GB, which scores 207,124 and is 5.4% ahead. The RTX 6000D also leads the A100 SXM4 40 GB by 4.7% and the RTX 5000 Ada Generation by 6.1%.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 6000D wins every head-to-head benchmark in the data, taking 1 win to 0 for the V100S. Its decisive victory comes in Geekbench OpenCL, where it scores 388,405—a 99.8% improvement over the V100S’s 194,415. This is a total sweep, not a marginal edge.

The V100S’s only statistical claim to relevance is its average benchmark score of 194,415, which is within 0.8% of the RTX 6000D’s 195,964. However, that average is derived from a single benchmark (Geekbench OpenCL), whereas the RTX 6000D’s average includes both OpenCL and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. The V100S wins no individual test in the head-to-head data.

For workload-specific wins, the RTX 6000D’s architecture and memory system suggest advantages in ray tracing and modern graphics APIs—it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4, while the V100S is limited to DirectX 12 (12_1). The V100S has no RT cores, making it unsuitable for ray-traced workloads, whereas the RTX 6000D includes 156 RT cores. The RTX 6000D also wins decisively on raw compute, with FP32 throughput of 97.04 TFLOPS versus 16.35 TFLOPS for the V100S.

Architecture Differences

The RTX 6000D is built on Blackwell 2.0 architecture using the GB202 chip, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The V100S uses the older Volta architecture with the GV100 chip on a 12 nm process. This process shrink allows the RTX 6000D to pack 92,200 million transistors onto a 750 mm² die, achieving a transistor density of 122.9M per mm². The V100S, by contrast, has 21,100 million transistors on a larger 815 mm² die, yielding just 25.9M per mm²—a density that is less than one-quarter of the RTX 6000D’s.

The RTX 6000D features 19968 shading units, 624 TMUs, and 192 ROPs, alongside 156 RT cores and 624 tensor cores. The V100S has 5120 shading units, 320 TMUs, and 128 ROPs, with no RT cores but 640 tensor cores. The RTX 6000D’s tensor core count is slightly lower than the V100S’s, but its FP16 performance is identical to FP32 at 97.04 TFLOPS, whereas the V100S runs FP16 at a 2:1 ratio, delivering 32.71 TFLOPS.

Memory architecture differs fundamentally. The RTX 6000D uses 84 GB of GDDR7 with a 448-bit bus, while the V100S uses 32 GB of HBM2 with a 4096-bit bus. Despite the narrower bus, the RTX 6000D achieves higher bandwidth at 1.40 TB/s versus 1.13 TB/s, thanks to faster memory clocks (1560 MHz versus 1107 MHz). The RTX 6000D also supports PCIe 5.0 x16, while the V100S is limited to PCIe 3.0 x16.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ on nearly every specification field. The RTX 6000D has a base clock of 1992 MHz and a boost clock of 2430 MHz, compared to 1245 MHz base and 1597 MHz boost for the V100S. The RTX 6000D’s memory operates at 1560 MHz (25 Gbps effective), while the V100S runs at 1107 MHz (2.2 Gbps effective).

Pixel and texture rates diverge sharply: the RTX 6000D reaches 466.6 GPixel/s and 1,516.3 GTexel/s, versus 204.4 GPixel/s and 511.0 GTexel/s for the V100S. The RTX 6000D’s TDP is 600 W, requiring a 1000 W PSU and a single 16-pin connector; the V100S draws 250 W, needing a 600 W PSU and two 8-pin connectors. The RTX 6000D offers four DisplayPort 2.1b outputs, while the V100S has no display outputs at all.

The RTX 6000D measures 304 mm in length, 137 mm in height, and 40 mm in width; the V100S has no listed dimensions. Both are dual-slot cards. The RTX 6000D’s DirectX support is 12 Ultimate (12_2), while the V100S is capped at DirectX 12 (12_1). Both support OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The only shared benchmark in the data is Geekbench OpenCL, and the result is lopsided. The RTX 6000D scores 388,405, while the V100S scores 194,415. The delta is 99.8%, meaning the RTX 6000D nearly doubles the V100S’s output. This is not a marginal improvement—it is a complete generational leap.

To contextualize, the RTX 6000D’s OpenCL score is more than double the V100S’s. In the RTX 6000D’s other benchmark, 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 3522, a test the V100S cannot run given its lack of DirectX 12 Ultimate support. The RTX 6000D’s average benchmark score of 195,964 is 0.8% higher than the V100S’s 194,415, but that narrow aggregate gap is misleading—it is pulled down by the 3DMark result, which is a different metric entirely.

Looking at the RTX 6000D’s rival set, the V100S is its closest competitor on average score, but that proximity collapses under inspection. The RTX 6000D beats the V100S by 99.8% in OpenCL, while the A100 PCIe 80 GB (207,124 average) beats the RTX 6000D by 5.4%. This suggests the V100S and RTX 6000D are not truly comparable in compute workloads; the V100S sits closer to the A100 SXM4 40 GB (187,147), which the RTX 6000D leads by 4.7%.

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous: the RTX 6000D is the superior GPU for virtually any workload. It wins the only head-to-head benchmark by 99.8%, offers 6 times the FP32 throughput (97.04 TFLOPS versus 16.35 TFLOPS), and provides 2.6 times the memory capacity (84 GB versus 32 GB) with higher bandwidth (1.40 TB/s versus 1.13 TB/s). It is also current and active, while the V100S is end-of-life.

Buyers who need modern graphics features should choose the RTX 6000D without hesitation. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, includes 156 RT cores for ray tracing, and offers display outputs—capabilities the V100S entirely lacks. The RTX 6000D’s 600 W TDP and 1000 W PSU requirement are higher than the V100S’s 250 W and 600 W, but the performance differential justifies the power draw for compute-heavy tasks.

The V100S remains viable only for legacy compute environments that cannot migrate to newer architectures. Its 32 GB of HBM2 and 1.13 TB/s bandwidth are still respectable, and its 640 tensor cores provide FP16 acceleration at 32.71 TFLOPS. However, with no RT cores, no display outputs, and a 12 nm process that limits efficiency, it cannot compete with the RTX 6000D on any modern metric. The RTX 6000D’s launch MSRP is 8,565 USD, while the V100S has no listed launch MSRP.

For users weighing these two, the choice is straightforward: the RTX 6000D is the only rational pick unless a workload explicitly requires Volta’s specific tensor core behavior or a lower 250 W power envelope. The benchmark data shows a 99.8% performance gap—there is no scenario where the V100S wins on speed. The RTX 6000D is the definitive choice for new deployments, while the V100S should be considered only for maintaining existing infrastructure.