NVIDIA RTX 6000D vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB Comparison

NVIDIA
GEFORCE

NVIDIA RTX 6000D

CORE STATE GB202
VRAM 84 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2430 MHz
TDP 600 W
BUS WIDTH 448 bit
ARCHITECTURE Blackwell 2.0
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB

CORE STATE GV100
VRAM 16 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1380 MHz
TDP 300 W
BUS WIDTH 4096 bit
ARCHITECTURE Volta
nm
PROCESS 12 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2017

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
3,522
N/A
geekbench_opencl
388,405
163,063
geekbench_vulkan
N/A
113,062

Analysis: NVIDIA RTX 6000D vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB

NVIDIA RTX 6000D and NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB occupy opposite ends of the professional GPU timeline. The RTX 6000D is an active Blackwell 2.0 workstation part built on TSMC's 5 nm process, while the V100 is an end-of-life Volta accelerator from 2017 on a 12 nm process. Benchmark data shows a decisive generational gap, with the RTX 6000D delivering 138.2% higher OpenCL performance and carrying an average benchmark score of 195,964 compared to the V100's 138,063. The RTX 6000D also sits in the 98th percentile of all GPUs, versus the 96th percentile for the V100.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 6000D wins the only head-to-head benchmark recorded: Geekbench OpenCL. Its score of 388,405 dwarfs the V100's 163,063, a 138.2% advantage. This is not a marginal victory; it is a complete overhaul of compute throughput. The architectural leap from Volta to Blackwell 2.0 explains the bulk of this. The RTX 6000D's GB202 chip packs 92,200 million transistors across 750 mm², while the V100's GV100 die is larger at 815 mm² but holds only 21,100 million transistors. The transistor density tells the story: 122.9M per mm² on Blackwell versus 25.9M per mm² on Volta. The RTX 6000D also runs at 1,992 MHz base and 2,430 MHz boost clocks, far above the V100's 1,245 MHz base and 1,380 MHz boost.

The RTX 6000D wins on memory capacity and bandwidth. It offers 84 GB of GDDR7 on a 448-bit bus, delivering 1.40 TB/s. The V100 provides 16 GB of HBM2 on a 4096-bit bus at 897.0 GB/s. While the V100's bus is wider, the RTX 6000D's raw bandwidth is 56% higher. For workloads that saturate memory, the RTX 6000D has a clear edge in both capacity and throughput. The RTX 6000D also supports PCIe 5.0 x16, while the V100 is limited to PCIe 3.0 x16, which matters for data transfer to and from the host system.

The V100's only technical advantage lies in its power efficiency per watt, though the data does not provide a direct efficiency metric. The V100 draws 300 W TDP versus 600 W for the RTX 6000D. The RTX 6000D also requires a 1000 W suggested PSU and a single 16-pin connector, compared to the V100's 700 W suggested PSU and dual 8-pin connectors. For dense multi-GPU server deployments where power delivery is constrained, the V100's lower draw could be a practical consideration, but this does not translate into a benchmark win.

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous: the RTX 6000D is the superior performer in every measured category. Its average benchmark score of 195,964 is 41.9% higher than the V100's 138,063. In the direct head-to-head Geekbench OpenCL test, the RTX 6000D leads by 138.2%. The RTX 6000D also ranks 2 percentile points higher globally (98th vs 96th). Any workload that benefits from raw FP32 compute, memory bandwidth, or large memory capacity will favor the RTX 6000D decisively.

The V100 retains relevance only in legacy environments. It supports CUDA 12 (12_1) and OpenGL 4.6, but its 16 GB memory and 14.13 TFLOPS FP32 are a fraction of the RTX 6000D's 97.04 TFLOPS. Its tensor cores (640) are numerous but from an older Volta generation. The V100's production status is end-of-life, while the RTX 6000D is active. For new deployments or upgrades, the RTX 6000D is the only rational choice from this data. The V100 might be considered for a specific software stack that requires Volta's architecture or for systems with 300 W power limits, but no benchmark result supports that choice.

One nuance: the RTX 6000D's nearest rival is the NVIDIA Tesla V100S PCIe 32 GB, which scores 194,415 — just 0.8% behind. The RTX 6000D also leads the A100 SXM4 40 GB by 4.7% and the RTX 5000 Ada Generation by 6.1%. It trails the A100 PCIe 80 GB by 5.4%. This places the RTX 6000D firmly in the upper tier of accelerators. The V100, by contrast, sits within 1.7% of the AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo and leads the Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB by only 0.2%. The V100 is competitive with its immediate peers but is not in the same class as the RTX 6000D.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The single head-to-head benchmark is Geekbench OpenCL. The RTX 6000D scores 388,405 against the V100's 163,063. The delta is 138.2% in favor of the RTX 6000D. This is a massive gap that reflects the cumulative differences in architecture, clock speed, and memory subsystem. The RTX 6000D's FP32 throughput of 97.04 TFLOPS is 6.9 times the V100's 14.13 TFLOPS. Its texture rate of 1,516.3 GTexel/s is 3.4 times the V100's 441.6 GTexel/s. Pixel rate is 466.6 GPixel/s versus 176.6 GPixel/s.

The memory bandwidth difference is also stark: 1.40 TB/s for the RTX 6000D versus 897.0 GB/s for the V100. Even though the V100 has a 4096-bit bus, the GDDR7 memory on the RTX 6000D operates at an effective 25 Gbps, far above the V100's 1752 Mbps effective. The RTX 6000D also has 19,968 shading units, 624 TMUs, and 192 ROPs, compared to 5,120 shading units, 320 TMUs, and 128 ROPs on the V100. The RTX 6000D includes 156 RT cores and 624 tensor cores, while the V100 has no RT cores and 640 tensor cores.

The V100 does have a second benchmark in its own file — Geekbench Vulkan at 113,062 — but the RTX 6000D has no recorded Vulkan score, so no comparison is possible. The V100's OpenCL score of 163,063 is its higher benchmark, yet it still loses to the RTX 6000D by more than double. The RTX 6000D's avgBenchmarkScore of 195,964 is itself higher than the V100's best single benchmark result. This indicates that the RTX 6000D's performance is consistently high across multiple tests, not just a single favorable workload.

FAQ

Q: How much faster is the RTX 6000D than the V100 in OpenCL?

A: The RTX 6000D scores 388,405 in Geekbench OpenCL, while the V100 scores 163,063. That is a 138.2% higher score for the RTX 6000D.

Q: Which GPU has more memory bandwidth?

A: The RTX 6000D has 1.40 TB/s of bandwidth from 84 GB of GDDR7 on a 448-bit bus. The V100 has 897.0 GB/s from 16 GB of HBM2 on a 4096-bit bus.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for each GPU?

A: The RTX 6000D has an average benchmark score of 195,964, placing it in the 98th percentile of all GPUs. The V100's average is 138,063, placing it in the 96th percentile.

Q: Does the V100 have any advantage in power consumption?

A: Yes, the V100 has a 300 W TDP and requires a 700 W suggested PSU, while the RTX 6000D has a 600 W TDP and a 1000 W suggested PSU. The RTX 6000D also uses a single 16-pin connector versus the V100's dual 8-pin connectors.

Q: Are these GPUs from the same generation?

A: No. The RTX 6000D is Blackwell 2.0 architecture on TSMC's 5 nm process, released in 2025. The V100 is Volta architecture on 12 nm, released in 2017 and now end-of-life.

Q: Which GPU has more shading units?

A: The RTX 6000D has 19,968 shading units, while the V100 has 5,120. The RTX 6000D also has 624 TMUs and 192 ROPs versus 320 TMUs and 128 ROPs on the V100.

Architecture Differences

The RTX 6000D uses the GB202 chip under Blackwell 2.0 architecture, fabricated on TSMC's 5 nm process. The die measures 750 mm² and contains 92,200 million transistors, yielding a density of 122.9M per mm². The V100 uses the GV100 chip under Volta architecture, on TSMC's 12 nm process. Its die is larger at 815 mm² but holds only 21,100 million transistors, for a density of 25.9M per mm². The RTX 6000D's higher density enables far more compute resources in a similar physical footprint.

Memory architecture differs fundamentally. The RTX 6000D uses 84 GB of GDDR7 on a 448-bit bus with 1.40 TB/s bandwidth. The V100 uses 16 GB of HBM2 on a 4096-bit bus with 897.0 GB/s bandwidth. The V100's wider bus is a legacy design choice, but the RTX 6000D's faster memory clocks (1560 MHz base, 25 Gbps effective) compensate. The RTX 6000D has 624 tensor cores and 156 RT cores; the V100 has 640 tensor cores but no RT cores. FP16 processing also differs: the RTX 6000D achieves 97.04 TFLOPS FP16 at a 1:1 ratio with FP32, while the V100 achieves 28.26 TFLOPS FP16 at a 2:1 ratio.

Interface and output capabilities diverge sharply. The RTX 6000D supports PCIe 5.0 x16 and has 4x DisplayPort 2.1b outputs. The V100 supports PCIe 3.0 x16 and has no display outputs, making it a compute-only accelerator. The RTX 6000D supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The V100 supports DirectX 12 (12_1), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The RTX 6000D is dual-slot, 304 mm long, 137 mm high, and 40 mm wide, with a 600 W TDP and 1x 16-pin power. The V100 is also dual-slot but has no listed dimensions, a 300 W TDP, and 2x 8-pin power.

The release timeline and product positioning are telling. The RTX 6000D launched in 2025 with an 8,565 USD launch MSRP and is currently active, succeeding Workstation Ada. The V100 launched in 2017, is end-of-life, succeeded Tesla Turing, and preceded Tesla Pascal. The RTX 6000D's nearest rivals include the Tesla V100S PCIe 32 GB (0.8% behind) and the A100 PCIe 80 GB (ahead by 5.4%). The V100's nearest rivals are the Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB (0.2% behind) and the AMD Instinct MI100 (ahead by 0.7%). These competitive positions confirm that the RTX 6000D competes with modern data-center accelerators, while the V100 sits among older and lower-performance parts.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
RTX 6000D
Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB
Core Specs
Shading Units
19,968
5,120 -74.4%
Shaders
19,968
5,120 -74.4%
TMUs
624
320 -48.7%
ROPs
192
128 -33.3%
SM Count
156
80 -48.7%
Clocks
Base Clock
1992 MHz
1245 MHz
Boost Clock
2430 MHz
1380 MHz
Memory Clock
1560 MHz 25 Gbps effective
876 MHz 1752 Mbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
84 GB
16 GB
VRAM (MB)
86,016
16,384 -81.0%
Memory Type
GDDR7
HBM2
Memory Bus
448 bit
4096 bit
Bandwidth
1.40 TB/s
897.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
128 MB
6 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
466.6 GPixel/s
176.6 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
1,516.3 GTexel/s
441.6 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
97.04 TFLOPS
14.13 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
1.516 TFLOPS (1:64)
7.066 TFLOPS (1:2)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
97.04 TFLOPS (1:1)
28.26 TFLOPS (2:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
156
—
Tensor Cores
624
640 +2.6%
Power
TDP
600 W
300 W
TDP (W)
600
300 -50.0%
Suggested PSU
1000 W
700 W
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
2x 8-pin
Architecture
Architecture
Blackwell 2.0
Volta
GPU Name
GB202
GV100
Generation
Blackwell PRO W (x000)
Tesla Volta (Vxx)
Process Size
5 nm
12 nm
Transistors
92,200 million
21,100 million
Die Size
750 mm²
815 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
122.9M / mm²
25.9M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 (12_1)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
12.0
7.0
Shader Model
6.9
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
Dual-slot
Dual-slot
Length
304 mm 12 inches
—
Height
137 mm 5.4 inches
—
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.1b
No outputs
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Other
Launch Price
8,565 USD
—
Production
Active
End-of-life
Predecessor
Workstation Ada
Tesla Pascal
Successor
—
Tesla Turing
View RTX 6000D Details View Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB Details