GPU Comparison

NVIDIA

GEFORCE

NVIDIA RTX 6000D

CORE STATE GB202

VRAM 84 GB

CLOCK SPEED 2430 MHz

TDP 600 W

BUS WIDTH 448 bit

ARCHITECTURE Blackwell 2.0

PROCESS 5 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2025

NVIDIA

GEFORCE

RTX A2000 Mobile

CORE STATE GA107

VRAM 4 GB

CLOCK SPEED 1687 MHz

TDP 95 W

BUS WIDTH 128 bit

ARCHITECTURE Ampere

PROCESS 8 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2021

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12

3,522

N/A

geekbench_opencl

388,405

56,518

geekbench_vulkan

N/A

53,146

passmark_directx_10

N/A

passmark_directx_11

N/A

passmark_directx_12

N/A

passmark_directx_9

N/A

115

passmark_g2d

N/A

491

passmark_g3d

N/A

9,611

passmark_gpu_compute

N/A

4,334

Analysis: NVIDIA RTX 6000D vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile

The graphics card evaluation between NVIDIA NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile GPU and RTX 6000 from NVIDIA shows notably close results. Both options alternate leads throughout diverse benchmarks, with not one claiming a definitive lead. This benchmark data supports this finding. Not one graphics card dominates consistently. Users confront a true dilemma with these options.

Looking at a hardware angle, NVIDIA NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile GPU and RTX 6000 from NVIDIA feature similar hardware. Video memory capacity, CUDA/stream cores, and bus throughput are nearly comparable. This spec equivalence supports the comparable score figures. None of the possesses a significant hardware superiority. This matchup is even.

Finally, consumers should decide based on ecosystem preference as opposed to benchmark performance exclusively. Both NVIDIA NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile GPU and RTX 6000 from NVIDIA offer capable gaming results for their intended segments. This choice rests on particular preferences. Any choice is reasonable. Users couldn't go badly between them.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

RTX 6000D

RTX A2000 Mobile

Core Specs

Shading Units

19,968

2,560 -87.2%

Shaders

19,968

2,560 -87.2%

TMUs

624

80 -87.2%

ROPs

192

48 -75.0%

SM Count

156

20 -87.2%

Clocks

Base Clock

1590 MHz

1215 MHz

Boost Clock

2430 MHz

1687 MHz

Memory Clock

1750 MHz 28 Gbps effective

1500 MHz 12 Gbps effective

Memory

Memory Size

84 GB

4 GB

VRAM (MB)

86,016

4,096 -95.2%

Memory Type

GDDR7

GDDR6

Memory Bus

448 bit

128 bit

Bandwidth

1.57 TB/s

192.0 GB/s

Cache

L1 Cache

128 KB (per SM)

L2 Cache

128 MB

2 MB

Performance

Pixel Rate

466.6 GPixel/s

80.98 GPixel/s

Texture Rate

1,516.3 GTexel/s

135.0 GTexel/s

FP32 (TFLOPS)

97.04 TFLOPS

8.637 TFLOPS

FP64 (TFLOPS)

1.516 TFLOPS (1:64)

135.0 GFLOPS (1:64)

FP16 (TFLOPS)

97.04 TFLOPS (1:1)

8.637 TFLOPS (1:1)

AI/RT

RT Cores

156

20 -87.2%

Tensor Cores

624

80 -87.2%

Power

TDP

600 W

95 W

TDP (W)

600

95 -84.2%

Suggested PSU

1000 W

—

Power Connectors

1x 16-pin

None

Architecture

Blackwell 2.0

Ampere

GPU Name

GB202

GA107

Generation

Blackwell PRO W (x000)

Ampere-MW (Ax000)

Process Size

5 nm

8 nm

Transistors

92,200 million

8,700 million

Die Size

750 mm²

200 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Samsung

Density

122.9M / mm²

43.5M / mm²

API Support

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

OpenGL

4.6

Vulkan

1.4

OpenCL

3.0

CUDA

12.0

8.6

Shader Model

6.8

Physical

Slot Width

Dual-slot

IGP

Length

304 mm 12 inches

—

Height

137 mm 5.4 inches

—

Outputs

4x DisplayPort 2.1b

Portable Device Dependent

Bus Interface

PCIe 5.0 x16

PCIe 4.0 x16

Other

Launch Price

8,565 USD

—

Production

Active

End-of-life

Predecessor

Workstation Ada

Quadro Turing-M

Successor

—

Ada-MW

View RTX 6000D Details View RTX A2000 Mobile Details

GPU Comparison

NVIDIA RTX 6000D

RTX A2000 Mobile

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

Analysis: NVIDIA RTX 6000D vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

Related Graphics Cards

Related Comparisons