GPU Comparison

NVIDIA
GEFORCE

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation

CORE STATE AD103
VRAM 16 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2115 MHz
TDP 120 W
BUS WIDTH 256 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ada Lovelace
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2023
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

RTX A2000 Mobile

CORE STATE GA107
VRAM 4 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1687 MHz
TDP 95 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ampere
nm
PROCESS 8 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2021

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
3,596
N/A
geekbench_opencl
N/A
56,518
geekbench_vulkan
N/A
53,146
passmark_directx_10
N/A
57
passmark_directx_11
N/A
68
passmark_directx_12
N/A
47
passmark_directx_9
N/A
115
passmark_g2d
N/A
491
passmark_g3d
N/A
9,611
passmark_gpu_compute
N/A
4,334

Analysis: NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile

If analyzing the NVIDIA NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile versus RTX 5000 by NVIDIA, the benchmark difference turns clearly evident. the NVIDIA NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile takes the crown in virtually each game we performed. The margin is significant sufficiently to affect actual visual experiences. Users will observe improved performance. This conclusion is evident.

Game performance performance across multiple games consistently favor the NVIDIA NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile. Whether it's esports titles to demanding games, the NVIDIA NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile maintains its advantage. This benchmark dependability across diverse scenarios indicates underlying design superiority. Gamers will expect capable experiences irrespective of genre. This flexibility is outstanding.

For real-time ray tracing, the NVIDIA NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile jumps considerably forward of RTX 5000 by NVIDIA. Its RT cores handle heavy shadow computations considerably more efficiently. Gamers looking for modern fidelity should seriously choose the NVIDIA NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile. The ray tracing capability is substantial. Modern games progressively use hardware RT technology.

Ultimately: the NVIDIA NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile claims this battle clearly. Users seeking graphics performance should strongly choose the NVIDIA NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile over RTX 5000 by NVIDIA. This test results validates this assessment. The scenarios can execute substantially more fluidly. It's a definite winner in this tier.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation
RTX A2000 Mobile
Core Specs
Shading Units
9,728
2,560 -73.7%
Shaders
9,728
2,560 -73.7%
TMUs
304
80 -73.7%
ROPs
112
48 -57.1%
SM Count
76
20 -73.7%
Clocks
Base Clock
1425 MHz
1215 MHz
Boost Clock
2115 MHz
1687 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz 18 Gbps effective
1500 MHz 12 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
16 GB
4 GB
VRAM (MB)
16,384
4,096 -75.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
256 bit
128 bit
Bandwidth
576.0 GB/s
192.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
64 MB
2 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
236.9 GPixel/s
80.98 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
643.0 GTexel/s
135.0 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
41.15 TFLOPS
8.637 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
643.0 GFLOPS (1:64)
135.0 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
41.15 TFLOPS (1:1)
8.637 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
76
20 -73.7%
Tensor Cores
304
80 -73.7%
Power
TDP
120 W
95 W
TDP (W)
120
95 -20.8%
Power Connectors
None
None
Architecture
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Ampere
GPU Name
AD103
GA107
Generation
Ada-MW (x000A)
Ampere-MW (Ax000)
Process Size
5 nm
8 nm
Transistors
45,900 million
8,700 million
Die Size
379 mm²
200 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Samsung
Density
121.1M / mm²
43.5M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
8.9
8.6
Shader Model
6.8
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
IGP
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
Portable Device Dependent
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
PCIe 4.0 x16
Other
Production
Active
End-of-life
Predecessor
Ampere-MW
Quadro Turing-M
Successor
Blackwell-MW
Ada-MW
View RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation Details View RTX A2000 Mobile Details