GPU Comparison

Intel
GPU

Intel Arc A310

CORE STATE DG2-128
VRAM 4 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1750 MHz
TDP 30 W
BUS WIDTH 64 bit
ARCHITECTURE Xe-HPG
nm
PROCESS 6 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2022
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation

CORE STATE AD103
VRAM 16 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2115 MHz
TDP 120 W
BUS WIDTH 256 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ada Lovelace
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2023

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl
30,607
N/A
geekbench_vulkan
28,964
N/A
passmark_directx_10
31
N/A
passmark_directx_11
33
N/A
passmark_directx_12
29
N/A
passmark_directx_9
69
N/A
passmark_g2d
625
N/A
passmark_g3d
5,433
N/A
passmark_gpu_compute
2,157
N/A
3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
N/A
3,596

Analysis: Intel Arc A310 vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation

Reviewing the test figures for the Arc A310 card from Intel and NVIDIA RTX 5000 GPU, a definite pattern develops. the Arc A310 card from Intel consistently provides stronger performance in this benchmarking. This benchmark edge ranges from substantial to exceptional according to the particular benchmark. Such steadiness testifies to inherent technical advantages. Users wanting gaming performance should consider this.

Game performance performance over multiple titles reliably advantage the Arc A310 card from Intel. Whether it's fast-paced titles to AAA releases, the Arc A310 card from Intel holds its edge. The frame rate consistency across multiple workloads proves core technical advantages. Players can expect capable frame rates independent of title. The versatility is remarkable.

Game performance benchmarks over diverse resolutions reliably support the Arc A310 card from Intel. From esports games to blockbuster titles, the Arc A310 card from Intel keeps its edge. The frame rate reliability throughout diverse games shows fundamental design improvements. Enthusiasts will rely on excellent frame rates regardless of title. This capability is impressive.

In conclusion, the Arc A310 card from Intel represents the more capable option in this analysis. Its gaming edges justify attention for buyers putting together a powerful visual system. Although NVIDIA RTX 5000 GPU offers its advantages, the benchmark results definitely benefits the Arc A310 card from Intel. Form your selection with this in mind. This performance difference is notable sufficiently to influence.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
A310
RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation
Core Specs
Shading Units
768
9,728 +1166.7%
Shaders
768
9,728 +1166.7%
TMUs
32
304 +850.0%
ROPs
16
112 +600.0%
SM Count
76
Execution Units
96
Clocks
Base Clock
1750 MHz
1425 MHz
Boost Clock
1750 MHz
2115 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz 15.5 Gbps effective
2250 MHz 18 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
4 GB
16 GB
VRAM (MB)
4,096
16,384 +300.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
64 bit
256 bit
Bandwidth
124.0 GB/s
576.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
4 MB
64 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
28.00 GPixel/s
236.9 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
56.00 GTexel/s
643.0 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
2.688 TFLOPS
41.15 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
672.0 GFLOPS (1:4)
643.0 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
5.376 TFLOPS (2:1)
41.15 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
6
76 +1166.7%
Tensor Cores
304
XMX Cores
96
Power
TDP
30 W
120 W
TDP (W)
30
120 +300.0%
Suggested PSU
200 W
Power Connectors
None
None
Architecture
Architecture
Xe-HPG
Ada Lovelace
GPU Name
DG2-128
AD103
Generation
Alchemist (Arc 3)
Ada-MW (x000A)
Process Size
6 nm
5 nm
Transistors
7,200 million
45,900 million
Die Size
157 mm²
379 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
45.9M / mm²
121.1M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
8.9
Shader Model
6.6
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
Single-slot
IGP
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Portable Device Dependent
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 4.0 x16
Other
Production
End-of-life
Active
Predecessor
Xe Graphics
Ampere-MW
Successor
Battlemage
Blackwell-MW
View Arc A310 Details View RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation Details