NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

The Verdict

The database comparison between the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 and the Lisuan Tech LX PRO presents two very different design philosophies. The NVIDIA part is a low-power, integrated-class mobile GPU built on a mature Ada Lovelace architecture. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO is a conventional dual-slot desktop card with a newer 6 nm process, more memory, and higher raw throughput in certain operations.

The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada X2 is the choice for systems where power draw and physical footprint are the primary constraints. Its 150 W TDP slots into a compact IGP form factor with no external power connectors, making it suitable for embedded or mobile workstation chassis. It also carries the architectural advantage of dedicated ray tracing cores (76) and tensor cores (304), which the Lisuan part lacks entirely.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO is the choice for users who need maximum VRAM capacity and higher FP16 throughput. Its 24 GB GDDR6 frame buffer is 50% larger than the NVIDIA card's 16 GB, and its FP16 performance reaches 49.15 TFLOPS, a figure the RTX card cannot match due to its 1:1 FP16/FP32 ratio. The LX PRO also delivers a higher pixel rate (192.0 GPixel/s versus 188.2 GPixel/s) and comes with four physical DisplayPort 1.4a outputs.

Neither card shows a benchmark advantage in the recorded data, as both have an average benchmark score of zero and a percentile ranking of 50 against all GPUs. With no benchmark wins registered for either side, the decision rests entirely on specification-level differences.

Architecture Differences

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 uses the AD103 chip built on TSMC's 5 nm process, containing 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die. This yields a transistor density of 121.1 million transistors per mm². The architecture is Ada Lovelace, and the GPU generation is designated Ada-MW. Its predecessor is Ampere-MW and its successor is Blackwell-MW, confirming its position in NVIDIA's mobile workstation lineup.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO uses the 7G105 chip on TSMC's 6 nm process. Its transistor count and die size are listed as unknown, so no direct density comparison is possible. The architecture is called TrueGPU, with a generation designation of 7G100. The process node is one step behind the NVIDIA part in lithography (6 nm versus 5 nm), though both come from TSMC's foundry.

The NVIDIA card integrates 9,728 shading units, 304 texture mapping units (TMUs), and 112 raster output units (ROPs). It features 76 ray tracing cores and 304 tensor cores, providing hardware acceleration for ray-traced workloads and AI-based operations such as DLSS. The Lisuan card has 6,144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. It has no listed ray tracing cores or tensor cores, meaning those specialized workloads rely on general-purpose compute.

Memory configurations differ significantly. The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada X2 uses 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Lisuan LX PRO uses 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s. The NVIDIA part wins on bandwidth by 144 GB/s, while the Lisuan part wins on capacity by 8 GB. Both run memory at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective transfer rates.

The API support is nearly identical. Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The NVIDIA card supports Vulkan 1.4, while the Lisuan card supports Vulkan 1.3, a minor version difference.

FAQ

Q: Which card has more VRAM?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory, while the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 has 16 GB. The Lisuan card offers 50% more capacity.

Q: Which card has higher memory bandwidth?

A: The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 achieves 576.0 GB/s over a 256-bit bus. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO achieves 432.0 GB/s over a 192-bit bus, a gap of 144 GB/s in favor of the NVIDIA part.

Q: Does the Lisuan Tech LX PRO have ray tracing cores?

A: No. The database lists no ray tracing cores for the Lisuan Tech LX PRO. The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 includes 76 dedicated ray tracing cores.

Q: What are the power requirements for each card?

A: The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 has a 150 W TDP and requires no external power connectors. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has a 225 W TDP, uses a single 16-pin power connector, and has a suggested PSU rating of 550 W.

Q: Which card supports higher FP16 throughput?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX PRO delivers 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 with a 2:1 ratio relative to FP32. The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 delivers 32.69 TFLOPS FP16 at a 1:1 ratio, meaning it offers no FP16 acceleration advantage over FP32.

Q: What is the physical form factor difference?

A: The NVIDIA card is an IGP (integrated graphics processor) with no defined dimensions and a slot width listed as IGP. The Lisuan card is a dual-slot desktop card measuring 248 mm in length, 118 mm in height, and 48 mm in width.

Specification Differences

| Specification | NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada X2 | Lisuan Tech LX PRO |

|---|---|---|

| Process node | 5 nm | 6 nm |

| Transistors | 45,900 million | Unknown |

| Die size | 379 mm² | Unknown |

| Transistor density | 121.1M / mm² | Not listed |

| Base clock | 930 MHz | Not listed |

| Boost clock | 1680 MHz | Not listed |

| Memory size | 16 GB | 24 GB |

| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |

| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 192 bit |

| Memory bandwidth | 576.0 GB/s | 432.0 GB/s |

| Shading units | 9,728 | 6,144 |

| TMUs | 304 | 192 |

| ROPs | 112 | 96 |

| Ray tracing cores | 76 | Not listed |

| Tensor cores | 304 | Not listed |

| Pixel rate | 188.2 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture rate | 510.7 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 performance | 32.69 TFLOPS | 24.58 TFLOPS |

| FP16 performance | 32.69 TFLOPS (1:1) | 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 150 W | 225 W |

| Slot width | IGP | Dual-slot |

| Power connectors | None | 1x 16-pin |

| Suggested PSU | Not listed | 550 W |

| Display outputs | Portable Device Dependent | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| Vulkan support | 1.4 | 1.3 |

| Release date | 2023-03-20 | 2026-03-16 |

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database records no benchmark scores for either card. Both have an average benchmark score of zero, and both sit at the 50th percentile among all GPUs. The head-to-head benchmark section contains no entries, and neither card registers a win count. This means the performance comparison must be drawn from the recorded specification-level metrics rather than measured application tests.

In FP32 compute, the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 delivers 32.69 TFLOPS against the Lisuan Tech LX PRO's 24.58 TFLOPS. That is a 33% advantage for the NVIDIA card in standard single-precision workloads. The NVIDIA part also leads in texture rate with 510.7 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s, a 33% margin that reflects its higher TMU count (304 versus 192) and higher boost clock (1680 MHz versus an unlisted boost clock for the Lisuan part).

In FP16 compute, the Lisuan Tech LX PRO takes the lead with 49.15 TFLOPS using a 2:1 FP16 ratio. The NVIDIA card achieves 32.69 TFLOPS FP16 with a 1:1 ratio, meaning its FP16 throughput is identical to its FP32 throughput. The Lisuan card's FP16 output is 50% higher than the NVIDIA card's FP16 output. This matters for workloads that can exploit half-precision arithmetic.

In pixel throughput, the Lisuan card edges ahead with 192.0 GPixel/s versus 188.2 GPixel/s. The difference is small, about 2%, and results from the Lisuan card's higher ROP count (96 versus 112 is actually lower for Lisuan, but its higher clock compensates). The NVIDIA card has more ROPs (112 versus 96), yet the Lisuan card still achieves a slightly higher pixel rate, indicating a significant clock speed advantage on the Lisuan part.

Memory bandwidth clearly favors the NVIDIA card. Its 576.0 GB/s exceeds the Lisuan card's 432.0 GB/s by 33%. The NVIDIA card uses a 256-bit bus versus 192-bit, which more than compensates for the Lisuan card's larger capacity.

The Lisuan card draws 225 W versus 150 W for the NVIDIA card. That is a 50% higher power envelope. The Lisuan card requires a 16-pin connector and a 550 W suggested PSU, while the NVIDIA card uses no external power and has no suggested PSU listed.

Where Each One Wins

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 wins in scenarios that demand efficient compute throughput per watt. Its FP32 performance of 32.69 TFLOPS is 33% higher than the Lisuan card, and it achieves this within a 150 W TDP, which is 75 W lower than the Lisuan card's 225 W TDP. The texture rate advantage of 510.7 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s makes it stronger for texture-bound workloads such as traditional rasterization with heavy texture sampling. The 576.0 GB/s memory bandwidth gives it a clear edge in bandwidth-sensitive tasks, particularly at high resolutions with large texture sets. Its 76 ray tracing cores and 304 tensor cores provide dedicated hardware that the Lisuan card lacks entirely, making it the only option here for ray-traced rendering or AI-accelerated features. The IGP form factor, no power connectors, and portable-device-dependent display outputs position it for embedded and mobile systems where space and power budgets are tight.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO wins in scenarios that prioritize memory capacity and half-precision throughput. Its 24 GB VRAM is 8 GB larger than the NVIDIA card, which matters for large datasets, high-resolution textures, or machine learning models that must fit entirely in GPU memory. Its FP16 output of 49.15 TFLOPS is 50% higher than the NVIDIA card, making it stronger for AI inference and training workloads that operate in half precision. The pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s, slightly ahead of the NVIDIA card, gives it a marginal edge in fill-rate-bound rendering. The dual-slot design with four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs makes it a straightforward drop into a desktop workstation, and its 6 nm process node is newer than the NVIDIA card's 5 nm node, though the NVIDIA card still achieves higher FP32 output. The LX PRO's 192-bit bus limits bandwidth to 432.0 GB/s, but its larger frame buffer and higher FP16 throughput make it the more capable card for memory-heavy compute tasks.

For a builder selecting between these two, the data points are unambiguous. Choose the NVIDIA card for compact embedded systems, ray tracing, tensor-accelerated workloads, and maximum FP32 performance per watt. Choose the Lisuan card for desktop workstations that need 24 GB of VRAM, FP16 compute throughput, and conventional PCIe slot installation with standard display outputs.