GPU Comparison

NVIDIA
GEFORCE

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

CORE STATE AD104
VRAM 20 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1560 MHz
TDP 70 W
BUS WIDTH 160 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ada Lovelace
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2023
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

T400

CORE STATE TU117
VRAM 2 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1425 MHz
TDP 30 W
BUS WIDTH 64 bit
ARCHITECTURE Turing
nm
PROCESS 12 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2021

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl
124,812
17,039
geekbench_vulkan
109,364
15,976

Analysis: NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs NVIDIA T400

Analyzing the test figures for the NVIDIA RTX 4000 and Radeon NVIDIA T400, a clear trend appears. the NVIDIA RTX 4000 steadily provides stronger frame rates in the analysis. This rendering superiority spans from substantial to outstanding based on the specific benchmark. This steadiness testifies to fundamental engineering superiority. Buyers wanting graphics capability might pay attention.

In-game tests throughout various scenarios steadily favor the NVIDIA RTX 4000. Whether it's multiplayer scenarios to demanding productions, the NVIDIA RTX 4000 maintains its advantage. This performance consistency throughout different scenarios proves inherent architectural superiority. Gamers might anticipate strong performance irrespective of title. The capability is impressive.

When it comes to ray tracing, the NVIDIA RTX 4000 jumps further beyond of Radeon NVIDIA T400. Its specialized cores handle heavy reflection calculations more effectively. Players demanding cutting-edge fidelity might certainly pick the NVIDIA RTX 4000. This RT advantage is considerable. Contemporary AAA games increasingly take advantage of hardware RT features.

When all is said and done: the NVIDIA RTX 4000 claims this battle clearly. Users seeking visual performance would strongly select the NVIDIA RTX 4000 over Radeon NVIDIA T400. This test numbers supports this recommendation. Your workloads can perform significantly smoother. This is a straightforward victor in this class.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
T400
Core Specs
Shading Units
6,144
384 -93.8%
Shaders
6,144
384 -93.8%
TMUs
192
24 -87.5%
ROPs
64
16 -75.0%
SM Count
48
6 -87.5%
Clocks
Base Clock
720 MHz
420 MHz
Boost Clock
1560 MHz
1425 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz 14 Gbps effective
1250 MHz 10 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
20 GB
2 GB
VRAM (MB)
20,480
2,048 -90.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
160 bit
64 bit
Bandwidth
280.0 GB/s
80.00 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
48 MB
1024 KB
Performance
Pixel Rate
99.84 GPixel/s
22.80 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
299.5 GTexel/s
34.20 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
19.17 TFLOPS
1,094.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
299.5 GFLOPS (1:64)
34.20 GFLOPS (1:32)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
19.17 TFLOPS (1:1)
2.189 TFLOPS (2:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
48
Tensor Cores
192
Power
TDP
70 W
30 W
TDP (W)
70
30 -57.1%
Suggested PSU
250 W
200 W
Power Connectors
None
None
Architecture
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Turing
GPU Name
AD104
TU117
Generation
Workstation Ada (x000A)
Quadro Turing (Tx000)
Process Size
5 nm
12 nm
Transistors
35,800 million
4,700 million
Die Size
294 mm²
200 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
121.8M / mm²
23.5M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 (12_1)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
8.9
7.5
Shader Model
6.8
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
Dual-slot
Single-slot
Length
168 mm 6.6 inches
Height
69 mm 2.7 inches
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Other
Production
Active
End-of-life
Predecessor
Workstation Ampere
Quadro Volta
Successor
Blackwell PRO W
Workstation Ampere
View RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation Details View T400 Details