NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

The Verdict

The NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation and Lisuan Tech LX PRO occupy different positions in the database. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation holds a 95th percentile rank among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 135218 across two recorded tests. The LX PRO has no recorded benchmark scores, sits at the 50th percentile, and shows an average score of 0. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is the only one of the two with measurable performance data, making it the clear choice for any workload where verified compute results matter.

The LX PRO offers a larger memory pool at 24 GB versus 20 GB, along with higher memory bandwidth at 432.0 GB/s versus 360.0 GB/s. It also delivers a higher pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s compared to 139.2 GPixel/s. However, the RTX 4000 Ada Generation counters with higher FP32 throughput at 26.73 TFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS, a lower power draw of 130 W versus 225 W, and a single-slot form factor versus the LX PRO's dual-slot design. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation also includes ray tracing cores and tensor cores, which the LX PRO does not list.

For users prioritizing verified benchmark performance, a mature driver ecosystem with DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4 support, and lower system power requirements, the RTX 4000 Ada Generation is the data-supported pick. For users who need the largest framebuffer and highest memory bandwidth available in this comparison, the LX PRO provides those specifications on paper, but without benchmark results to confirm real-world behavior.

Architecture Differences

The two cards come from different architectural lineages. The NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation uses the AD104 chip built on Ada Lovelace architecture, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It integrates 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 121.8M per mm². The Lisuan Tech LX PRO uses the 7G105 chip with TrueGPU architecture, part of the 7G100 generation, fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC. Its transistor count and die size are listed as unknown in the database.

Both cards feature 6144 shading units and 192 texture mapping units. The similarity ends there. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation includes 48 ray tracing cores and 192 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI workloads. The LX PRO lists no ray tracing cores and no tensor cores. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation has 64 raster output units, while the LX PRO has 96, which explains its higher pixel rate. The LX PRO uses a 192-bit memory bus versus the RTX 4000 Ada Generation's 160-bit bus, and both use GDDR6 memory at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed.

The API support differs in one key area. Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX PRO supports Vulkan 1.3. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation was released on 2023-08-08, and the LX PRO has a release date of 2026-03-16. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation lists a predecessor in Workstation Ampere and a successor in Blackwell PRO W; the LX PRO lists neither.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark entries between the RTX 4000 Ada Generation and the LX PRO. The win counts for both cards stand at zero. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation does have two individual benchmark scores: 146593 in Geekbench OpenCL and 123842 in Geekbench Vulkan. These results average to 135218, placing the card at the 95th percentile of all GPUs in the database.

The LX PRO has no recorded benchmark scores in any test. Its average benchmark score is 0, and its percentile rank is 50. Without measured results, the LX PRO's performance characteristics can only be inferred from its specifications, not confirmed from actual workload execution.

The RTX 4000 Ada Generation's nearest rivals in the database provide context for its performance tier. The NVIDIA A10M scores 135230, essentially identical with a delta of 0%. The AMD Radeon PRO W6800 scores 135396, putting the RTX 4000 Ada Generation 0.1% behind. The AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo scores 135774, a 0.4% gap. The AMD Radeon PRO V620 scores 136472, placing the RTX 4000 Ada Generation 0.9% behind. These deltas indicate the RTX 4000 Ada Generation sits in a tightly contested performance band, with all four rivals within roughly one percent of its average score.

Specification Differences

The following fields differ between the two cards:

Chip and architecture: The RTX 4000 Ada Generation uses the AD104 chip with Ada Lovelace architecture, while the LX PRO uses the 7G105 chip with TrueGPU architecture.

Process node: The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is fabricated on a 5 nm process, while the LX PRO uses a 6 nm process.

Transistors and die size: The RTX 4000 Ada Generation has 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die. The LX PRO lists both as unknown.

Transistor density: The RTX 4000 Ada Generation has 121.8M transistors per mm²; the LX PRO has no listed value.

Core clocks: The RTX 4000 Ada Generation has a base clock of 1500 MHz and a boost clock of 2175 MHz. The LX PRO has no base or boost clock listed.

Memory size: The RTX 4000 Ada Generation has 20 GB; the LX PRO has 24 GB.

Memory bus width: The RTX 4000 Ada Generation uses a 160-bit bus; the LX PRO uses a 192-bit bus.

Memory bandwidth: The RTX 4000 Ada Generation delivers 360.0 GB/s; the LX PRO delivers 432.0 GB/s.

Raster output units: The RTX 4000 Ada Generation has 64 ROPs; the LX PRO has 96.

Ray tracing cores: The RTX 4000 Ada Generation has 48; the LX PRO has none listed.

Tensor cores: The RTX 4000 Ada Generation has 192; the LX PRO has none listed.

Pixel rate: The RTX 4000 Ada Generation achieves 139.2 GPixel/s; the LX PRO achieves 192.0 GPixel/s.

Texture rate: The RTX 4000 Ada Generation achieves 417.6 GTexel/s; the LX PRO achieves 384.0 GTexel/s.

FP32 throughput: The RTX 4000 Ada Generation delivers 26.73 TFLOPS; the LX PRO delivers 24.58 TFLOPS.

FP16 throughput: The RTX 4000 Ada Generation delivers 26.73 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio; the LX PRO delivers 49.15 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio.

TDP: The RTX 4000 Ada Generation draws 130 W; the LX PRO draws 225 W.

Slot width: The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is single-slot; the LX PRO is dual-slot.

Suggested PSU: The RTX 4000 Ada Generation recommends a 300 W power supply; the LX PRO recommends a 550 W power supply.

Dimensions: The RTX 4000 Ada Generation measures 245 mm (9.6 inches) in length and 112 mm (4.4 inches) in height. The LX PRO measures 248 mm (9.8 inches) in length, 118 mm (4.6 inches) in height, and 48 mm (1.9 inches) in width.

Vulkan support: The RTX 4000 Ada Generation supports Vulkan 1.4; the LX PRO supports Vulkan 1.3.

Release date: The RTX 4000 Ada Generation launched on 2023-08-08; the LX PRO launched on 2026-03-16.

Predecessor and successor: The RTX 4000 Ada Generation lists Workstation Ampere as predecessor and Blackwell PRO W as successor; the LX PRO lists neither.

Benchmark data: The RTX 4000 Ada Generation has scores of 146593 in Geekbench OpenCL and 123842 in Geekbench Vulkan, with an average of 135218 and a 95th percentile rank. The LX PRO has no benchmark scores, an average of 0, and a 50th percentile rank.

Production status: Both are listed as Active.

Shared specifications: Both use GDDR6 memory at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective), 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, 1x 16-pin power connector, DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), and OpenGL 4.6.

FAQ

Q: Which card has higher FP32 compute throughput?

A: The NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation delivers 26.73 TFLOPS in FP32, while the Lisuan Tech LX PRO delivers 24.58 TFLOPS. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is ahead by roughly 2.15 TFLOPS.

Q: Does the Lisuan Tech LX PRO have ray tracing or tensor cores?

A: No. The LX PRO lists no ray tracing cores and no tensor cores in the database. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation includes 48 ray tracing cores and 192 tensor cores.

Q: Which card has more memory and higher bandwidth?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s. The NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation has 20 GB on a 160-bit bus, delivering 360.0 GB/s.

Q: What are the benchmark scores for each card?

A: The RTX 4000 Ada Generation scores 146593 in Geekbench OpenCL and 123842 in Geekbench Vulkan, averaging 135218. The LX PRO has no recorded benchmark scores, with an average benchmark score of 0.

Q: How does the RTX 4000 Ada Generation compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RTX 4000 Ada Generation sits within 0.9% of four rivals. It matches the NVIDIA A10M at 135230 with a 0% delta, trails the AMD Radeon PRO W6800 by 0.1% (135396), trails the AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo by 0.4% (135774), and trails the AMD Radeon PRO V620 by 0.9% (136472).

Q: What are the power requirements for each card?

A: The RTX 4000 Ada Generation has a TDP of 130 W and a suggested power supply of 300 W. The LX PRO has a TDP of 225 W and a suggested power supply of 550 W.

Q: Which card supports a newer Vulkan version?

A: The RTX 4000 Ada Generation supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX PRO supports Vulkan 1.3. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6.