NVIDIA RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data provides no direct head-to-head benchmark scores between the NVIDIA RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation and the Lisuan Tech LX PRO. Both entries in the database show an average benchmark score of 0 and a percentile rank of 50 among all GPUs, with no nearest rivals listed. This means the comparison must rely entirely on the architectural and specification differences captured in the database rather than measured performance deltas.

The absence of benchmark results is itself informative. The RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation sits in the mobile integrated graphics segment, while the LX PRO is a dual-slot desktop card. Their intended operating environments differ so sharply that no shared benchmark workload has been recorded for both. The data shows the LX PRO delivers substantially higher raw compute figures on paper, but the RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation counters with efficiency and feature-set advantages that matter in its portable context.

The LX PRO leads decisively in every throughput metric. Its FP32 rating of 24.58 TFLOPS stands 55% above the RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation’s 15.82 TFLOPS. The pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s doubles the NVIDIA part’s 98.88 GPixel/s. Texture rate follows the same pattern: 384.0 GTexel/s versus 247.2 GTexel/s, a 55% advantage. These are not marginal gaps; they represent a different performance class entirely.

The RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation does not win any recorded throughput comparison. However, its 100 W TDP versus the LX PRO’s 225 W TDP means it delivers 0.158 TFLOPS per watt, while the LX PRO delivers 0.109 TFLOPS per watt. That efficiency margin is real, but the database does not include any power-normalized benchmark scores, so it cannot be expressed as a performance-per-watt win in measured workloads.

Memory capacity favors the LX PRO at 24 GB versus 12 GB, but bandwidth is identical at 432.0 GB/s due to the same 192-bit bus width and 18 Gbps effective memory speed. The LX PRO’s memory clock matches the RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation at 2250 MHz. Doubling capacity without increasing bandwidth means the LX PRO can hold larger datasets but moves them at the same rate.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 compute?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX PRO delivers 24.58 TFLOPS, which is 55% higher than the NVIDIA RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation’s 15.82 TFLOPS.

Q: Do both GPUs share the same memory bandwidth?

A: Yes. Both use GDDR6 memory with a 192-bit bus and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth, running at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed. The LX PRO has 24 GB capacity while the RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation has 12 GB.

Q: What is the power consumption difference?

A: The RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation has a 100 W TDP, while the Lisuan Tech LX PRO has a 225 W TDP. The LX PRO also lists a suggested PSU of 550 W and uses a 1x 16-pin power connector, whereas the RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation has no power connectors and an IGP slot width.

Q: Which GPU supports a newer Vulkan version?

A: The NVIDIA RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation supports Vulkan 1.4, while the Lisuan Tech LX PRO only reaches Vulkan 1.3. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6.

Q: What process nodes do the two chips use?

A: The RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation uses a 5 nm process with 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die. The LX PRO’s chip, the 7G105, uses a 6 nm process, but its transistor count and die size are listed as unknown.

Q: Are ray tracing and tensor cores present in both?

A: The RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation includes 40 RT cores and 160 tensor cores. The LX PRO lists no RT cores and no tensor cores in the database, indicating these features are either absent or unrecorded.

Architecture Differences

The RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation uses the AD104 chip built on NVIDIA’s Ada Lovelace architecture. It is fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC with 35,800 million transistors packed into a 294 mm² die. The transistor density works out to 121.8M per mm². Its predecessor is Ampere-MW and its successor is Blackwell-MW, placing it in a clear generational lineage.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO uses the 7G105 chip under the TrueGPU architecture. It is fabricated on a 6 nm process, also at TSMC, but the database records no transistor count or die size. The generation field lists 7G100, with no predecessor or successor. The lack of transistor data makes density comparisons impossible, but the 6 nm node indicates a less dense process than the RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation’s 5 nm node.

The RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation’s Ada Lovelace architecture includes dedicated RT cores (40) and tensor cores (160). These hardware units accelerate ray tracing and AI workloads. The LX PRO has no RT core or tensor core entries in the database, suggesting it relies on pure shader compute for all rendering tasks. This is a fundamental architectural split: one GPU dedicates silicon to specialized acceleration, the other pours everything into general-purpose ALUs.

The shading unit counts reflect this design philosophy. The LX PRO has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation has 5120 shading units, 160 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. The LX PRO’s 20% more shading units, 20% more TMUs, and 50% more ROPs all feed into its higher pixel and texture rates. The Ada part compensates with its specialized cores, which the LX PRO lacks entirely.

API support shows a similar split. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation reaches Vulkan 1.4, one version ahead of the LX PRO’s Vulkan 1.3. The newer Vulkan revision can matter for developers targeting the latest graphics features, though both remain current enough for mainstream titles.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs diverge on nearly every measurable specification. The RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation has a base clock of 1110 MHz and a boost clock of 1545 MHz. The LX PRO lists no base or boost clocks at all, leaving its operating frequency unknown. The memory clock is identical at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed.

Memory capacity differs by 12 GB: the LX PRO carries 24 GB of GDDR6, the RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation carries 12 GB. Both use a 192-bit bus and achieve 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The LX PRO’s larger frame buffer supports heavier workloads, but the equal bandwidth means neither can move data faster than the other.

The RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation’s FP16 throughput matches its FP32 at 15.82 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). The LX PRO’s FP16 performance reaches 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio), meaning it doubles its FP32 rate when using half precision. This makes the LX PRO notably stronger for FP16 compute tasks, assuming software uses that path.

Physical dimensions separate the two entirely. The RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation is an IGP (integrated graphics processor) with no length, height, or width recorded. The LX PRO is a dual-slot card measuring 248 mm long, 118 mm high, and 48 mm wide, requiring a 1x 16-pin power connector and a 550 W suggested PSU. The RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation has no power connectors and a 100 W TDP.

Display outputs also differ. The LX PRO provides 4x DisplayPort 1.4a connectors. The RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation’s outputs are listed as “Portable Device Dependent,” meaning its display connectivity depends on the laptop or mobile chassis it is integrated into. The RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation uses PCIe 4.0 x16, and the LX PRO uses the same interface.

Release dates separate them by roughly three years. The RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation launched on 2023-03-20, while the LX PRO launched on 2026-03-16. Both are listed as Active in production status. The RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation belongs to the GeForce 30-series family per the database, despite its Ada Lovelace architecture, while the LX PRO has no series designation.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear split by use case. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO is the stronger raw compute device. Its 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, 49.15 TFLOPS FP16, 192.0 GPixel/s pixel rate, 384.0 GTexel/s texture rate, and 24 GB memory capacity all exceed the NVIDIA RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation by wide margins. For any workload that stresses raw shader throughput, large textures, or high-resolution pixel fill, the LX PRO holds the advantage.

The NVIDIA RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation counters with efficiency and portability. Its 100 W TDP is 125 W lower than the LX PRO’s 225 W TDP. It fits in an IGP form factor with no power connectors, while the LX PRO demands a dual-slot chassis, a 16-pin connector, and a 550 W PSU. The Ada part also adds 40 RT cores and 160 tensor cores, hardware the LX PRO does not list, plus Vulkan 1.4 support versus 1.3.

The percentile field shows both GPUs at 50, meaning the database ranks them identically against all other GPUs despite their different specifications. This suggests the database does not weight raw compute alone, or the lack of benchmark scores keeps both at a neutral position. The 0 average benchmark score for both reinforces that no measured performance data exists to separate them.

For a mobile workstation or laptop where power draw, heat, and physical space are constrained, the RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation is the only viable choice from this pair. For a desktop workstation with a 550 W PSU, a dual-slot expansion slot, and workloads that use FP16 or need more than 12 GB of VRAM, the LX PRO appears better suited on paper. The absence of benchmark scores means these conclusions rest on specification analysis rather than measured results.

Where Each One Wins

The LX PRO wins in FP32 compute, delivering 24.58 TFLOPS versus 15.82 TFLOPS. It also wins FP16 compute outright: 49.15 TFLOPS at 2:1 ratio, more than triple the RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation’s 15.82 TFLOPS at 1:1. Pixel fill rate goes to the LX PRO at 192.0 GPixel/s versus 98.88 GPixel/s, and texture fill rate goes to the LX PRO at 384.0 GTexel/s versus 247.2 GTexel/s. Memory capacity favors the LX PRO at 24 GB versus 12 GB, with equal bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s.

The RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation wins on power efficiency at the specification level. Its 100 W TDP produces 15.82 TFLOPS of FP32, a ratio of 0.158 TFLOPS per watt, while the LX PRO produces 24.58 TFLOPS at 225 W, a ratio of 0.109 TFLOPS per watt. The Ada part also wins on form factor, occupying an IGP slot with no power connectors, versus the LX PRO’s dual-slot footprint and 1x 16-pin connector. The RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation’s 40 RT cores and 160 tensor cores give it capabilities the LX PRO lacks, and its Vulkan 1.4 support is one version newer than the LX PRO’s 1.3.

The process node favors the RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation at 5 nm versus the LX PRO’s 6 nm, though the LX PRO’s transistor count is unknown. The RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation’s 35,800 million transistors on 294 mm² gives it a density of 121.8M per mm², a figure the LX PRO cannot match due to missing data. The RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation launched in March 2023, predating the LX PRO’s March 2026 release, giving it a longer track record in the field.

Neither GPU has recorded benchmark scores, so the wins above are purely structural. The LX PRO dominates every throughput metric and memory capacity, while the RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation dominates efficiency, feature set, and physical footprint. For tasks like machine learning inference that use tensor cores, the RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation has dedicated hardware, but its lower FP16 throughput suggests the LX PRO may still outperform in pure half-precision math. For rasterization-heavy workloads with large textures, the LX PRO’s higher ROP count (96 versus 64) and texture units (192 versus 160) point to better fill-bound performance. For portable or low-power systems, the RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation’s 100 W TDP and IGP design make it the only realistic option.