GPU Comparison

Intel
GPU

Intel Arc A770

CORE STATE DG2-512
VRAM 16 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2400 MHz
TDP 225 W
BUS WIDTH 256 bit
ARCHITECTURE Xe-HPG
nm
PROCESS 6 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2022
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation

CORE STATE AD107
VRAM 8 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2115 MHz
TDP 50 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ada Lovelace
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2023

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
2,969
N/A
geekbench_opencl
109,175
N/A
geekbench_vulkan
94,284
N/A

Analysis: Intel Arc A770 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation

The graphics card comparison between Arc A770 by Intel and the RTX 2000 card from NVIDIA demonstrates impressively matched results. These cards alternate wins across diverse benchmarks, with neither establishing a definitive lead. This test data validates this observation. No graphics card excels consistently. Users confront a real decision here.

When gaming capability is so similar, MSRP and features become the main elements. Examine hardware RT capability, reconstruction features, power consumption, and platform stability when deciding between Arc A770 by Intel and the RTX 2000 card from NVIDIA. These elements can sway the decision. Consider comprehensively. The larger picture plays a role.

Gaming results also show close performance between Arc A770 by Intel and the RTX 2000 card from NVIDIA. Performance differences generally sit within testing variance. The slight deltas are hardly detectable during real play sessions. Each options deliver fluid performance. Players could select confidently between both cards.

For those torn between Arc A770 by Intel and the RTX 2000 card from NVIDIA, rest assured that any choice offers comparable graphics performance. This score data validates nil decisive champion. Base your determination on other factors and enjoy solid graphics results either way. Either are winners in their respective sense. Pick comfortably.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
A770
RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation
Core Specs
Shading Units
4,096
3,072 -25.0%
Shaders
4,096
3,072 -25.0%
TMUs
256
96 -62.5%
ROPs
128
48 -62.5%
SM Count
24
Execution Units
512
Clocks
Base Clock
2100 MHz
1635 MHz
Boost Clock
2400 MHz
2115 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective
2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
16 GB
8 GB
VRAM (MB)
16,384
8,192 -50.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
256 bit
128 bit
Bandwidth
512.0 GB/s
256.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
16 MB
12 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
307.2 GPixel/s
101.5 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
614.4 GTexel/s
203.0 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
19.66 TFLOPS
12.99 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
2.458 TFLOPS (1:8)
203.0 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
39.32 TFLOPS (2:1)
12.99 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
32
24 -25.0%
Tensor Cores
96
XMX Cores
512
Power
TDP
225 W
50 W
TDP (W)
225
50 -77.8%
Suggested PSU
550 W
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
None
Architecture
Architecture
Xe-HPG
Ada Lovelace
GPU Name
DG2-512
AD107
Generation
Alchemist (Arc 7)
Ada-MW (x000A)
Process Size
6 nm
5 nm
Transistors
21,700 million
18,900 million
Die Size
406 mm²
159 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
53.4M / mm²
118.9M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
8.9
Shader Model
6.6
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
Dual-slot
IGP
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Portable Device Dependent
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
PCIe 4.0 x16
Other
Launch Price
329 USD
Production
End-of-life
Active
Predecessor
Xe Graphics
Ampere-MW
Successor
Battlemage
Blackwell-MW
View Arc A770 Details View RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation Details