NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 72 GB Blackwell Comparison

The benchmark data presents a complete and decisive generational mismatch. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 72 GB Blackwell is in a different performance class entirely, winning 7 out of 7 head-to-head tests against the NVIDIA Quadro P2000. The data shows a near-total eclipse of the older Pascal architecture, with the RTX PRO 5000 leading by margins that range from a modest 46% in 2D graphics to a staggering 434.2% in compute workloads. The Quadro P2000, while a capable product in its own era, is simply outmatched by every measurable metric in this comparison.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most significant win for the RTX PRO 5000 comes in the Passmark GPU Compute test, where it scores 15,667 against the P2000's 2,933. This is a delta of 434.2%, a margin that dwarfs all other comparisons. This result is a direct reflection of the fundamental architectural differences between the two cards, particularly in raw parallel processing power and memory bandwidth. The RTX PRO 5000's FP32 throughput of 66.94 TFLOPS compared to 3.031 TFLOPS for the P2000 explains this chasm in compute performance.

In the Passmark G3D test, which represents overall 3D graphics performance, the RTX PRO 5000 scores 24,310 versus 6,956 for the P2000, a 249.5% advantage. This is the headline gaming and rendering performance metric, and the data shows the RTX PRO 5000 is more than three times faster. The older DirectX 10 and DirectX 11 tests show the largest relative gaps, with the RTX PRO 5000 leading by 414.7% (175 vs 34) and 366% (219 vs 47), respectively. These legacy API results highlight how the newer card's brute-force shader power overwhelms the P2000's older architecture.

The Passmark DirectX 12 test shows a 178.6% advantage for the RTX PRO 5000 (78 vs 28), which is notable because it reflects a more modern workload. The P2000's support for DirectX 12 (12_1) is present, but its performance is severely limited. Even in the Passmark DirectX 9 test, which is the oldest API tested, the RTX PRO 5000 wins by 150.8% (311 vs 124). The smallest performance gap is in the Passmark G2D test, where the RTX PRO 5000 scores 914 against 626, a 46% lead. This is the only test where the P2000 is remotely competitive, which is expected as 2D desktop workloads are far less demanding on the GPU's core architecture.

The overall average benchmark scores reflect this dominance: the RTX PRO 5000 averages 6,407 across all its tests, while the P2000 averages 6,049. This is a surprisingly small difference given the head-to-head results, but it is skewed by the fact that the P2000's benchmark suite includes Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan tests, which are not present in the RTX PRO 5000's data. The RTX PRO 5000's percentile rank of 37 vs the P2000's 35 shows both cards sit in a similar low percentile of all GPUs, but this is misleading due to the different benchmark distributions. The head-to-head data is the only reliable comparison, and it is unequivocal.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX PRO 5000 wins in every single category where a direct comparison exists. There is no workload in the FACT PACK where the Quadro P2000 comes out ahead. For users prioritizing modern compute, AI-adjacent workloads, or high-resolution rendering, the RTX PRO 5000 is the only logical choice based on the data. Its massive lead in GPU Compute (434.2%) and G3D (249.5%) makes it suitable for tasks that require significant parallel processing, such as complex simulations, video encoding, or 3D scene rendering.

The Quadro P2000's only area of relative strength is the 2D desktop environment, where its 46% deficit in the G2D test is its best showing. However, even here, it loses. The data suggests that for any task that heavily utilizes the GPU's shader cores, tensor cores, or RT cores, the P2000 is not a viable competitor. The P2000's wins are nonexistent; it is a case of a legacy product being completely superseded.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gap between these two GPUs is the primary driver of the performance discrepancy. The RTX PRO 5000 is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture using a 5 nm process at TSMC, while the P2000 is based on the older Pascal architecture on a 16 nm process. This process node difference is a major factor, allowing the RTX PRO 5000 to pack 92,200 million transistors onto a 750 mm² die, compared to 4,400 million transistors on a 200 mm² die for the P2000. The transistor density tells the story: 122.9M / mm² for the RTX PRO 5000 versus 22.0M / mm² for the P2000.

The core configurations are vastly different. The RTX PRO 5000 features 14,080 shading units, 440 TMUs, and 160 ROPs, alongside 110 RT cores and 440 tensor cores. The P2000 has only 1,024 shading units, 64 TMUs, and 40 ROPs, with no dedicated RT or tensor cores. The presence of RT cores and tensor cores is a fundamental feature difference; the RTX PRO 5000 is designed for hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI workloads, while the P2000 lacks these capabilities entirely. Memory is another major divergence: the RTX PRO 5000 comes with 72 GB of GDDR7 on a 384-bit bus, delivering 1.34 TB/s of bandwidth, while the P2000 has 5 GB of GDDR5 on a 160-bit bus, offering 140.2 GB/s.

Clock speeds also differ, with the RTX PRO 5000 boosting to 2377 MHz compared to the P2000's 1480 MHz. The FP32 compute performance is 66.94 TFLOPS for the RTX PRO 5000 versus 3.031 TFLOPS for the P2000, and its FP16 performance is 66.94 TFLOPS (1:1) versus 47.36 GFLOPS (1:64) for the P2000, showing a massive difference in compute precision support. The RTX PRO 5000 uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, while the P2000 uses PCIe 3.0 x16.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has better raw compute performance?

A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 72 GB Blackwell is vastly superior, scoring 15,667 in Passmark GPU Compute compared to 2,933 for the Quadro P2000, a 434.2% difference.

Q: Is the Quadro P2000 competitive in any benchmark?

A: No. The data shows the RTX PRO 5000 wins all 7 head-to-head tests. The P2000's closest result is a 46% loss in the Passmark G2D test.

Q: What is the memory capacity difference?

A: The RTX PRO 5000 has 72 GB of GDDR7 memory, whereas the Quadro P2000 has 5 GB of GDDR5 memory.

Q: Does the Quadro P2000 support hardware ray tracing?

A: No. The P2000 has no RT cores listed in its specifications, while the RTX PRO 5000 features 110 RT cores.

Q: Which card has a higher boost clock?

A: The RTX PRO 5000 boosts to 2377 MHz, compared to the Quadro P2000's boost clock of 1480 MHz.

Q: What is the process node for each GPU?

A: The RTX PRO 5000 uses a 5 nm process at TSMC, while the Quadro P2000 uses a 16 nm process at TSMC.

Specification Differences

| Specification | NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 72 GB Blackwell | NVIDIA Quadro P2000 |

| :--- | :--- | :--- |

| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Pascal |

| Process Node | 5 nm | 16 nm |

| Transistors | 92,200 million | 4,400 million |

| Die Size | 750 mm² | 200 mm² |

| Base Clock | 1740 MHz | 1076 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2377 MHz | 1480 MHz |

| Memory Size | 72 GB | 5 GB |

| Memory Type | GDDR7 | GDDR5 |

| Memory Bus | 384 bit | 160 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 1.34 TB/s | 140.2 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 14080 | 1024 |

| TMUs | 440 | 64 |

| ROPs | 160 | 40 |

| RT Cores | 110 | None |

| Tensor Cores | 440 | None |

| FP32 Performance | 66.94 TFLOPS | 3.031 TFLOPS |

| FP16 Performance | 66.94 TFLOPS (1:1) | 47.36 GFLOPS (1:64) |

| TDP | 300 W | 75 W |

| Slot Width | Dual-slot | Single-slot |

| Power Connectors | 1x 16-pin | None |

| Suggested PSU | 700 W | 250 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 5.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | 4x DisplayPort 2.1b | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| DirectX Support | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (12_1) |

| Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 196 mm (7.7 inches) |

| Production Status | Active | End-of-life |

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous: the NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 72 GB Blackwell is the superior product in every measurable way. It wins all seven head-to-head benchmarks, with margins ranging from 46% to over 434%. Anyone requiring maximum compute throughput, the highest shader performance, or the ability to handle large datasets in VRAM should choose the RTX PRO 5000. Its 72 GB of GDDR7 memory and 1.34 TB/s bandwidth are in a different league from the P2000's 5 GB and 140.2 GB/s.

The NVIDIA Quadro P2000 is a legacy product that is now end-of-life. Its performance profile, with a mere 3.031 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and no RT or tensor cores, places it in a fundamentally different segment. The only scenario where the P2000 might be considered is if a system has strict power or physical constraints, as it requires a 75 W TDP and a single-slot design. However, from a pure performance standpoint, the choice is clear. The RTX PRO 5000's 249.5% lead in G3D and 434.2% lead in compute makes it the definitive choice for any modern professional workload, and the P2000 should only be considered for legacy applications where its specific feature set is required.