GPU Comparison

Intel
GPU

Intel Arc A380

CORE STATE DG2-128
VRAM 6 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2050 MHz
TDP 75 W
BUS WIDTH 96 bit
ARCHITECTURE Xe-HPG
nm
PROCESS 6 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2022
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

PG506-232

CORE STATE GA100
VRAM 24 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1440 MHz
TDP 165 W
BUS WIDTH 3072 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ampere
nm
PROCESS 7 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2021

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
808
N/A
geekbench_opencl
38,224
225,124
geekbench_vulkan
36,736
N/A
passmark_directx_10
37
N/A
passmark_directx_11
38
N/A
passmark_directx_12
35
N/A
passmark_directx_9
73
N/A
passmark_g2d
610
N/A
passmark_g3d
6,252
N/A
passmark_gpu_compute
2,762
N/A

Analysis: Intel Arc A380 vs NVIDIA PG506-232

If gaming capability is extremely evenly balanced, the analysis between the Arc A380 and GeForce NVIDIA PG506-232 gets especially complex. The two cards trade leads across multiple titles. This combined result is one of surprising balance. Not one comes out as a undisputed leader. This decision rests on personal needs.

In-game tests similarly demonstrate close scores between the Arc A380 and GeForce NVIDIA PG506-232. FPS variations generally fall within margin of error. This small deltas are rarely perceptible during real gameplay. Either cards offer smooth gaming. Gaming enthusiasts can decide comfortably between both cards.

If frame rates is remarkably close, cost and capabilities turn the main factors. Examine ray tracing quality, AI upscaling support, thermal requirements, and software quality when selecting between the Arc A380 and GeForce NVIDIA PG506-232. The considerations could influence the decision. Consider comprehensively. The broader perspective matters.

All things considered, the comparison between the Arc A380 and GeForce NVIDIA PG506-232 concludes in a effective tie. Gaming variations are minor and unlikely to affect actual sessions. Focus your selection on value, software options, and individual capability priorities. The two are capable picks. The balance is real.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
A380
PG506-232
Core Specs
Shading Units
1,024
3,584 +250.0%
Shaders
1,024
3,584 +250.0%
TMUs
64
224 +250.0%
ROPs
32
96 +200.0%
SM Count
56
Execution Units
128
Clocks
Base Clock
2000 MHz
930 MHz
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
1440 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz 15.5 Gbps effective
1215 MHz 2.4 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
6 GB
24 GB
VRAM (MB)
6,144
24,576 +300.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6
HBM2
Memory Bus
96 bit
3072 bit
Bandwidth
186.0 GB/s
933.1 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
4 MB
24 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
65.60 GPixel/s
138.2 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
131.2 GTexel/s
322.6 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
4.198 TFLOPS
10.32 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
1,049.6 GFLOPS (1:4)
5.161 TFLOPS (1:2)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
8.397 TFLOPS (2:1)
10.32 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
8
Tensor Cores
224
XMX Cores
128
Power
TDP
75 W
165 W
TDP (W)
75
165 +120.0%
Suggested PSU
250 W
450 W
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
8-pin EPS
Architecture
Architecture
Xe-HPG
Ampere
GPU Name
DG2-128
GA100
Generation
Alchemist (Arc 3)
Server Ampere (Axx)
Process Size
6 nm
7 nm
Transistors
7,200 million
54,200 million
Die Size
157 mm²
826 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
45.9M / mm²
65.6M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
8.0
Shader Model
6.6
Physical
Slot Width
Dual-slot
Dual-slot
Length
222 mm 8.7 inches
267 mm 10.5 inches
Height
114 mm 4.5 inches
112 mm 4.4 inches
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
No outputs
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 4.0 x16
Other
Launch Price
149 USD
Production
End-of-life
End-of-life
Predecessor
Xe Graphics
Tesla Turing
Successor
Battlemage
Server Ada
View Arc A380 Details View PG506-232 Details