GPU Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon 760M

CORE STATE Phoenix
VRAM System Shared
CLOCK SPEED 2599 MHz
TDP 15 W
BUS WIDTH System Shared
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 3.0
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

PG506-232

CORE STATE GA100
VRAM 24 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1440 MHz
TDP 165 W
BUS WIDTH 3072 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ampere
nm
PROCESS 7 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2021

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
400
N/A
geekbench_opencl
20,255
225,124
geekbench_vulkan
30,336
N/A

Analysis: AMD Radeon 760M vs NVIDIA PG506-232

If gaming capability is extremely tightly matched, this matchup between AMD Radeon 760M from AMD and NVIDIA PG506-232 by NVIDIA turns increasingly nuanced. Both cards trade victories over various titles. The combined outcome is one of remarkable balance. No comes out as a obvious winner. The determination depends on personal requirements.

Gaming results similarly demonstrate matched results between AMD Radeon 760M from AMD and NVIDIA PG506-232 by NVIDIA. FPS variations usually fall under 5-10%. The slight variations are barely visible during actual gaming sessions. Each options offer smooth experiences. Gamers might select comfortably between the options.

In-game results also demonstrate matched frame rates between AMD Radeon 760M from AMD and NVIDIA PG506-232 by NVIDIA. FPS deltas generally sit within testing variance. This slight gaps are hardly visible during real gaming. Both graphics cards deliver responsive frame rates. Those who game could pick comfortably between them.

Finally, consumers might select based on ecosystem preference over pure performance solely. The two AMD Radeon 760M from AMD and NVIDIA PG506-232 by NVIDIA achieve excellent rendering performance for their intended tiers. The selection depends on particular priorities. Each option is reasonable. Users won't go wrong here.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
760M
PG506-232
Core Specs
Shading Units
512
3,584 +600.0%
Shaders
512
3,584 +600.0%
TMUs
32
224 +600.0%
ROPs
16
96 +500.0%
Compute Units
8
SM Count
56
Clocks
Base Clock
800 MHz
930 MHz
Boost Clock
2599 MHz
1440 MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared
1215 MHz 2.4 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
System Shared
24 GB
VRAM (MB)
24,576
Memory Type
System Shared
HBM2
Memory Bus
System Shared
3072 bit
Bandwidth
System Dependent
933.1 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
192 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
2 MB
24 MB
L0 Cache
32 KB per WGP
Performance
Pixel Rate
41.58 GPixel/s
138.2 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
83.17 GTexel/s
322.6 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
5.323 TFLOPS
10.32 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
332.7 GFLOPS (1:16)
5.161 TFLOPS (1:2)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
10.65 TFLOPS (2:1)
10.32 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
8
Tensor Cores
224
Power
TDP
15 W
165 W
TDP (W)
15
165 +1000.0%
Suggested PSU
450 W
Power Connectors
None
8-pin EPS
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
Ampere
GPU Name
Phoenix
GA100
Generation
Navi III IGP (Phoenix)
Server Ampere (Axx)
Process Size
4 nm
7 nm
Transistors
25,390 million
54,200 million
Die Size
178 mm²
826 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
142.6M / mm²
65.6M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
OpenCL
2.1
3.0
CUDA
8.0
Shader Model
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
Dual-slot
Length
267 mm 10.5 inches
Height
112 mm 4.4 inches
Outputs
Motherboard Dependent
No outputs
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 4.0 x16
Other
Production
Active
End-of-life
Predecessor
Navi II IGP
Tesla Turing
Successor
Server Ada
View Radeon 760M Details View PG506-232 Details