NVIDIA Jetson T4000 vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

The NVIDIA Jetson T4000 and the Lisuan Tech LX PRO occupy very different positions in the hardware landscape. The Jetson T4000 is a compact, integrated server-oriented module built on NVIDIA’s Blackwell architecture, while the Lisuan Tech LX PRO is a full-size, dual-slot discrete graphics card based on the TrueGPU architecture. Since the database records no direct benchmark scores for either product, the comparison below relies entirely on their recorded specifications, memory configurations, and architectural attributes.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

No benchmark entries exist in the database for either the NVIDIA Jetson T4000 or the Lisuan Tech LX PRO. Consequently, there are no measured frame rates, compute scores, or thermal results to compare directly. The absence of benchmark data means that any head-to-head performance analysis must be derived from the theoretical throughput figures provided in the specification records.

The most significant numerical difference lies in raw compute throughput. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO delivers 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, compared to 4.700 TFLOPS for the Jetson T4000. That places the LX PRO at roughly 5.2 times the FP32 throughput of the Jetson T4000. In FP16 workloads, the gap widens further. The LX PRO achieves 49.15 TFLOPS with a 2:1 FP16 to FP32 ratio, whereas the Jetson T4000 sustains 4.700 TFLOPS in FP16 with a 1:1 ratio. This means the Lisuan card offers over 10 times the FP16 throughput of the Jetson module.

Memory bandwidth tells a different story. The Jetson T4000 uses 64 GB of LPDDR5X on a 256-bit interface, yielding 273.2 GB/s. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO uses 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, achieving 432.0 GB/s. The LX PRO therefore provides 158.8 GB/s more bandwidth, an advantage of approximately 58 percent over the Jetson T4000. However, the Jetson T4000 has a substantial capacity advantage: 64 GB versus 24 GB, a difference of 40 GB.

Pixel and texture rates also favor the Lisuan Tech LX PRO. The LX PRO records 192.0 GPixel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s, while the Jetson T4000 records 24.48 GPixel/s and 73.44 GTexel/s. That is a pixel throughput advantage of 167.52 GPixel/s for the LX PRO and a texture throughput advantage of 310.56 GTexel/s. These figures indicate that the LX PRO is designed for heavy rasterization and texture-heavy workloads, whereas the Jetson T4000 is more constrained in those areas.

Raster operations units and texture mapping units reinforce this split. The LX PRO has 96 ROPs and 192 TMUs, while the Jetson T4000 has 16 ROPs and 48 TMUs. The LX PRO also has 6144 shading units versus 1536 for the Jetson T4000. In ray tracing cores, the Jetson T4000 includes 12 dedicated RT cores; the LX PRO lists no RT core count in the database. Tensor cores similarly appear only on the Jetson T4000, with 64 tensor cores recorded, while the LX PRO lists none.

Architecture Differences

The two products are built on different manufacturing processes and architectures. The Jetson T4000 uses a 5 nm process at TSMC, while the Lisuan Tech LX PRO uses a 6 nm process, also at TSMC. The Jetson T4000’s chip is designated GB10B, belonging to the Blackwell architecture and the Server Blackwell (Bxx) generation. The LX PRO uses the 7G105 chip, part of the TrueGPU architecture and the 7G100 generation.

Die size is recorded only for the Jetson T4000, at 391 mm². The LX PRO’s die size is unknown in the database. Transistor counts are also unknown for both products.

Clock behavior differs sharply. The Jetson T4000 has a fixed base and boost clock of 1530 MHz, with no game clock listed. The LX PRO has no base, boost, or game clock recorded at all. Memory clocks are recorded for both: the Jetson T4000 runs its LPDDR5X at 1067 MHz with 8.5 Gbps effective data rate, while the LX PRO runs its GDDR6 at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective. This explains the bandwidth difference despite the LX PRO’s narrower 192-bit bus.

The Jetson T4000 is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) with no display outputs, no power connectors, and a slot width of IGP. It is designed to be embedded into a server platform. The LX PRO is a dual-slot card with 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, a single 16-pin power connector, and a full PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. The Jetson T4000 uses PCIe 5.0 x8.

API support differs completely. The Jetson T4000 lists DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan as N/A. The LX PRO supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3. This means the Jetson T4000 is not intended for conventional graphics rendering through those APIs, while the LX PRO is a fully featured consumer or workstation graphics card.

Power draw is also distinct. The Jetson T4000 has a TDP of 90 W and a suggested PSU rating of 250 W. The LX PRO has a TDP of 225 W and a suggested PSU of 550 W. The Jetson T4000’s dimensions are 87 mm by 100 mm by 15 mm, while the LX PRO measures 248 mm by 118 mm by 48 mm.

Release dates place the Jetson T4000 first, with a recorded release date of 2026-01-04. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO follows with a release date of 2026-03-16. Both products are listed as Active in production status. The Jetson T4000 has a predecessor listed as Server Hopper and a successor as Server Rubin. The LX PRO has no predecessor or successor recorded.

Where Each One Wins

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO dominates in raw compute throughput, memory bandwidth, pixel fill, texture fill, and render output. Its 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 make it suitable for compute-heavy tasks such as large-scale matrix operations, AI inference with FP16 precision, and high-resolution graphics rendering. The 432.0 GB/s memory bandwidth supports data-intensive workloads that require rapid access to large datasets. The 192.0 GPixel/s pixel rate and 384.0 GTexel/s texture rate indicate strong performance in traditional 3D rendering pipelines. With 96 ROPs and 192 TMUs, the LX PRO can handle high-resolution framebuffers and texture-heavy scenes more efficiently than the Jetson T4000.

The LX PRO also wins in connectivity and API compatibility. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3, making it usable in standard gaming, workstation, and content creation environments. Its four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs allow multi-monitor setups. The PCIe 4.0 x16 interface provides a wide, standard connection path to host systems.

The NVIDIA Jetson T4000 wins in memory capacity, power efficiency, and form factor. Its 64 GB of LPDDR5X is more than double the LX PRO’s 24 GB, making it better for workloads that require very large in-memory models or datasets that cannot fit in smaller pools. This is particularly relevant for server-side AI inference, large language model serving, or big-data processing where capacity matters more than raw bandwidth.

The Jetson T4000 also draws far less power. Its 90 W TDP is 135 W lower than the LX PRO’s 225 W. The suggested PSU of 250 W versus 550 W indicates a much smaller system footprint. The Jetson T4000’s IGP form factor, with dimensions of 87 mm by 100 mm by 15 mm, fits into compact server chassis where a dual-slot card would not. The absence of power connectors simplifies integration.

The Jetson T4000 includes 12 RT cores and 64 tensor cores, which are absent from the LX PRO’s recorded specifications. This suggests that the Jetson T4000 has dedicated hardware for ray tracing and tensor operations, useful for specific server workloads such as neural network training or inference acceleration, even if its absolute throughput is lower.

The LX PRO has no recorded RT or tensor core counts, which may indicate that its architecture relies on general-purpose shading units for those tasks or that the database lacks the information.

FAQ

Q: Which product has higher FP32 compute performance?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX PRO records 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32, while the NVIDIA Jetson T4000 records 4.700 TFLOPS. The LX PRO is approximately 5.2 times faster in FP32.

Q: How much memory does each product have?

A: The NVIDIA Jetson T4000 has 64 GB of LPDDR5X on a 256-bit bus, providing 273.2 GB/s of bandwidth. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, providing 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Which product supports standard graphics APIs?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX PRO supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3. The NVIDIA Jetson T4000 lists DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan as N/A.

Q: What are the power requirements for each?

A: The NVIDIA Jetson T4000 has a TDP of 90 W and a suggested PSU of 250 W. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has a TDP of 225 W and a suggested PSU of 550 W.

Q: Does either product have dedicated ray tracing or tensor cores?

A: The NVIDIA Jetson T4000 records 12 RT cores and 64 tensor cores. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO records no RT cores or tensor cores in the database.

Q: What is the physical size difference?

A: The NVIDIA Jetson T4000 measures 87 mm by 100 mm by 15 mm and is an IGP. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO measures 248 mm by 118 mm by 48 mm and is a dual-slot card.

The Verdict

The data points to two distinct use cases. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO is the choice for anyone needing maximum compute throughput, high memory bandwidth, and standard graphics API support. Its 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, 432.0 GB/s bandwidth, and DirectX 12 Ultimate support make it appropriate for gaming, 3D rendering, and general compute workloads where performance per second matters. The 192.0 GPixel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s rates confirm its strength in rasterization-heavy tasks. The 6 nm process and 225 W TDP indicate a conventional high-performance discrete card.

The NVIDIA Jetson T4000 is suited for server environments where power draw, physical space, and memory capacity are the primary constraints. Its 90 W TDP and IGP form factor allow deployment in dense server racks. The 64 GB memory capacity is its standout feature, enabling large in-memory workloads that the LX PRO cannot accommodate. The presence of RT cores and tensor cores suggests that the Jetson T4000 is built for accelerated compute tasks such as ray tracing or tensor operations, even if its raw FP32 throughput is lower. The lack of display outputs and graphics API support confirms that it is not a consumer graphics card.

The 5 nm process gives the Jetson T4000 a smaller footprint and lower power draw, but the LX PRO’s 6 nm process still delivers substantially higher throughput. The Jetson T4000’s PCIe 5.0 x8 interface is newer than the LX PRO’s PCIe 4.0 x16, but the LX PRO’s wider interface offers more standard compatibility.

Neither product has a recorded benchmark score, so the percentile ranking for both is 50. That means the database places both at the midpoint of all GPUs, but only as a default value due to missing measurements.

For a builder assembling a workstation or gaming system, the Lisuan Tech LX PRO is the clear choice based on compute, bandwidth, and API support. For a server architect prioritizing memory capacity, power efficiency, and compact integration, the NVIDIA Jetson T4000 fits that role. The recorded specifications leave no ambiguity: the LX PRO is a high-throughput graphics card, and the Jetson T4000 is a low-power, high-capacity server module.

Specification Differences

| Specification | NVIDIA Jetson T4000 | Lisuan Tech LX PRO |

|----------------|---------------------|---------------------|

| Architecture | Blackwell | TrueGPU |

| Generation | Server Blackwell (Bxx) | 7G100 |

| Chip | GB10B | 7G105 |

| Process Node | 5 nm | 6 nm |

| Die Size | 391 mm² | unknown |

| Base Clock | 1530 MHz | null |

| Boost Clock | 1530 MHz | null |

| Memory Clock | 1067 MHz 8.5 Gbps effective | 2250 MHz 18 Gbps effective |

| Memory Size | 64 GB | 24 GB |

| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | GDDR6 |

| Memory Bus Width | 256 bit | 192 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 273.2 GB/s | 432.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 1536 | 6144 |

| TMUs | 48 | 192 |

| ROPs | 16 | 96 |

| RT Cores | 12 | null |

| Tensor Cores | 64 | null |

| Pixel Rate | 24.48 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 73.44 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 4.700 TFLOPS | 24.58 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 4.700 TFLOPS (1:1) | 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 90 W | 225 W |

| Slot Width | IGP | Dual-slot |

| Power Connectors | None | 1x 16-pin |

| Suggested PSU | 250 W | 550 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 5.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| DirectX | N/A | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |

| OpenGL | N/A | 4.6 |

| Vulkan | N/A | 1.3 |

| Length | 87 mm 3.4 inches | 248 mm 9.8 inches |

| Height | 100 mm 3.9 inches | 118 mm 4.6 inches |

| Width | 15 mm 0.6 inches | 48 mm 1.9 inches |

| Release Date | 2026-01-04 | 2026-03-16 |

| Predecessor | Server Hopper | null |

| Successor | Server Rubin | null |

| Launch MSRP | 1,999 USD | null |