GPU Comparison

NVIDIA
GEFORCE

NVIDIA H200 NVL

CORE STATE GH100
VRAM 141 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1785 MHz
TDP 600 W
BUS WIDTH 6144 bit
ARCHITECTURE Hopper
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

PG506-232

CORE STATE GA100
VRAM 24 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1440 MHz
TDP 165 W
BUS WIDTH 3072 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ampere
nm
PROCESS 7 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2021

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl
334,891
225,124

Analysis: NVIDIA H200 NVL vs NVIDIA PG506-232

If gaming capability is extremely similarly balanced, the matchup between the NVIDIA H200 NVL card from NVIDIA and NVIDIA's NVIDIA PG506-232 graphics grows particularly interesting. The two cards swap victories over multiple titles. This total assessment is one of impressive equivalence. No comes out as a undisputed leader. The selection relies on individual requirements.

Gaming tests likewise show competitive scores between the NVIDIA H200 NVL card from NVIDIA and NVIDIA's NVIDIA PG506-232 graphics. FPS deltas generally sit inside margin of error. The marginal deltas are rarely detectable during real gaming. The two cards offer responsive performance. Players could decide confidently between them.

From a technical viewpoint, the NVIDIA H200 NVL card from NVIDIA and NVIDIA's NVIDIA PG506-232 graphics have similar hardware. Video memory configuration, compute processors, and memory bandwidth are closely matched. The spec equality supports the comparable test data. None of the holds a significant specification superiority. The matchup is fair.

Overall, the analysis between the NVIDIA H200 NVL card from NVIDIA and NVIDIA's NVIDIA PG506-232 graphics ends in a practical stalemate. Gaming variations are minor and questionable to change actual experience. Center your decision on price, ecosystem considerations, and specific feature requirements. Either are excellent options. This parity is true.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
H200 NVL
PG506-232
Core Specs
Shading Units
16,896
3,584 -78.8%
Shaders
16,896
3,584 -78.8%
TMUs
528
224 -57.6%
ROPs
24
96 +300.0%
SM Count
132
56 -57.6%
Clocks
Base Clock
1365 MHz
930 MHz
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
1440 MHz
Memory Clock
1593 MHz 6.4 Gbps effective
1215 MHz 2.4 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
141 GB
24 GB
VRAM (MB)
144,384
24,576 -83.0%
Memory Type
HBM3e
HBM2
Memory Bus
6144 bit
3072 bit
Bandwidth
4.89 TB/s
933.1 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
256 KB (per SM)
192 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
50 MB
24 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
42.84 GPixel/s
138.2 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
942.5 GTexel/s
322.6 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
60.32 TFLOPS
10.32 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
30.16 TFLOPS (1:2)
5.161 TFLOPS (1:2)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
241.3 TFLOPS (4:1)
10.32 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
Tensor Cores
528
224 -57.6%
Power
TDP
600 W
165 W
TDP (W)
600
165 -72.5%
Suggested PSU
1000 W
450 W
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
8-pin EPS
Architecture
Architecture
Hopper
Ampere
GPU Name
GH100
GA100
Generation
Server Hopper (Hxx)
Server Ampere (Axx)
Process Size
5 nm
7 nm
Transistors
80,000 million
54,200 million
Die Size
814 mm²
826 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
98.3M / mm²
65.6M / mm²
API Support
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
9.0
8.0
Physical
Slot Width
Dual-slot
Dual-slot
Length
267 mm 10.5 inches
267 mm 10.5 inches
Height
111 mm 4.4 inches
112 mm 4.4 inches
Outputs
No outputs
No outputs
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
PCIe 4.0 x16
Other
Production
Active
End-of-life
Predecessor
Server Ada
Tesla Turing
Successor
Server Blackwell
Server Ada
View H200 NVL Details View PG506-232 Details