NVIDIA H100 NVL 94 GB vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data for both GPUs shows no direct head-to-head benchmark scores, as the database lists zero wins for each side and no matching benchmark entries. However, the raw compute specifications allow for a meaningful comparison of theoretical peak performance. The NVIDIA H100 NVL 94 GB leads decisively in raw FP32 throughput, delivering 60.32 TFLOPS versus the Lisuan Tech LX PRO's 24.58 TFLOPS. This represents a 2.45x advantage for the H100 NVL in single-precision floating-point work, a critical metric for scientific simulation, dense linear algebra, and traditional rendering workloads. The H100 NVL also dominates in FP16 compute, with 241.3 TFLOPS (4:1) compared to the LX PRO's 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1), a 4.9x gap that becomes even more pronounced in mixed-precision AI training and inference scenarios.

Memory bandwidth tells a similar story. The H100 NVL's HBM3 configuration delivers 3.94 TB/s across a 6016-bit bus, while the LX PRO's GDDR6 memory provides 432.0 GB/s over a 192-bit interface. That is a 9.1x bandwidth advantage for the NVIDIA part, which directly impacts memory-bound kernels, large model parameter updates, and high-resolution texture streaming. In terms of texture throughput, the H100 NVL posts 942.5 GTexel/s versus the LX PRO's 384.0 GTexel/s, a 2.45x lead. Interestingly, the pixel rate favors the LX PRO: 192.0 GPixel/s versus 42.84 GPixel/s, a 4.5x advantage that stems from the LX PRO having 96 ROPs compared to the H100 NVL's 24 ROPs. This indicates the LX PRO was designed with more traditional rasterization-oriented workloads in mind, while the H100 NVL prioritizes compute and memory bandwidth over pixel output.

The H100 NVL also carries 16,896 shading units and 528 TMUs, versus 6,144 shading units and 192 TMUs on the LX PRO. The NVIDIA chip's tensor core count of 528 further underscores its AI-focused design, while the LX PRO lists no tensor cores at all. For pure compute density, the H100 NVL's 60.32 TFLOPS FP32 and 241.3 TFLOPS FP16 are the dominant numbers in this comparison.

Architecture Differences

The underlying architectures diverge substantially. The NVIDIA H100 NVL uses the GH100 chip, built on the Hopper architecture, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It integrates 80,000 million transistors on a die size of 814 mm², yielding a transistor density of 98.3M per mm². The Lisuan Tech LX PRO uses the 7G105 chip, based on the "TrueGPU" architecture, manufactured on a 6 nm process also at TSMC. However, the database records no transistor count, die size, or density for the LX PRO, so a direct comparison of silicon complexity is not possible from the available data. The H100 NVL belongs to the "Server Hopper (Hxx)" generation, while the LX PRO is part of the "7G100" generation.

Memory architecture differs fundamentally. The H100 NVL uses 94 GB of HBM3 with a 6016-bit bus and 3.94 TB/s bandwidth, while the LX PRO uses 24 GB of GDDR6 with a 192-bit bus and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The H100 NVL's memory clock is listed as 1310 MHz (5.2 Gbps effective), whereas the LX PRO's memory runs at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The HBM3 implementation provides far greater capacity and bandwidth, but the GDDR6 clock speed on the LX PRO is higher in raw MHz terms.

The compute feature sets also differ. The H100 NVL includes 528 tensor cores, which the LX PRO lacks entirely. The LX PRO instead supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3, while the H100 NVL lists no API support in the database. The H100 NVL has no display outputs, whereas the LX PRO includes 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, indicating the LX PRO can drive displays directly while the H100 NVL is strictly a compute accelerator. The H100 NVL uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface, while the LX PRO uses PCIe 4.0 x16. Power delivery also differs: the H100 NVL draws a 400 W TDP and uses an 8-pin EPS connector with a suggested 800 W PSU, while the LX PRO has a 225 W TDP, uses a 1x 16-pin connector, and suggests a 550 W PSU.

Physical dimensions vary as well. The H100 NVL measures 267 mm in length (10.5 inches) and 111 mm in height (4.4 inches), while the LX PRO is 248 mm long (9.8 inches), 118 mm high (4.6 inches), and 48 mm wide (1.9 inches). Both are dual-slot cards. The H100 NVL's release date is recorded as 2023-03-20, while the LX PRO's is 2026-03-16, placing them roughly three years apart in the database timeline.

Where Each One Wins

The NVIDIA H100 NVL wins in every compute-heavy category except pixel rate. For FP32 throughput, it holds a 2.45x lead over the LX PRO. For FP16, the advantage expands to 4.9x, which is particularly relevant for AI training loops that rely on half-precision arithmetic. The H100 NVL also wins decisively in memory bandwidth (3.94 TB/s versus 432.0 GB/s), texture rate (942.5 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s), shading units (16,896 versus 6,144), TMUs (528 versus 192), and tensor cores (528 versus none). Its 94 GB memory capacity versus 24 GB means the H100 NVL can hold much larger models and datasets entirely in VRAM, reducing the need for memory swapping. The H100 NVL's PCIe 5.0 x16 interface also provides higher host-to-device transfer bandwidth than the LX PRO's PCIe 4.0 x16.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO wins in pixel throughput, posting 192.0 GPixel/s versus 42.84 GPixel/s, a 4.5x advantage. This comes from its 96 ROPs versus 24 ROPs on the H100 NVL. The LX PRO also offers display outputs (4x DisplayPort 1.4a), which the H100 NVL entirely lacks, making it suitable for direct display driving or workstation visualization tasks. The LX PRO has a lower TDP of 225 W versus 400 W, and its smaller physical footprint (248 mm length versus 267 mm) may fit in more chassis. Additionally, the LX PRO supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3, whereas the H100 NVL lists no API support, suggesting the LX PRO is more aligned with consumer or workstation graphics workloads.

The database assigns both GPUs a 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of zero, indicating that neither part has accumulated measurable benchmark results in this database yet. The wins tally shows 0 for each side, confirming that no head-to-head tests have been recorded.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 compute performance?

A: The NVIDIA H100 NVL 94 GB delivers 60.32 TFLOPS FP32, which is 2.45x higher than the Lisuan Tech LX PRO's 24.58 TFLOPS FP32.

Q: What is the memory capacity difference between the two?

A: The H100 NVL has 94 GB of HBM3 memory, while the LX PRO has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory. The H100 NVL also provides 3.94 TB/s bandwidth versus 432.0 GB/s on the LX PRO.

Q: Does the Lisuan Tech LX PRO support display outputs?

A: Yes, the LX PRO includes 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. The H100 NVL has no display outputs at all.

Q: Which GPU has tensor cores?

A: Only the NVIDIA H100 NVL lists 528 tensor cores. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no tensor cores recorded in the database.

Q: What are the TDP values for each card?

A: The H100 NVL has a TDP of 400 W and requires a suggested 800 W PSU. The LX PRO has a TDP of 225 W and a suggested 550 W PSU.

Q: Which GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX PRO supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3. The H100 NVL lists no API support in the database.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ across nearly every recorded specification field. The H100 NVL uses the GH100 chip on the Hopper architecture with a 5 nm process, while the LX PRO uses the 7G105 chip on the TrueGPU architecture with a 6 nm process. The H100 NVL integrates 80,000 million transistors on an 814 mm² die, while the LX PRO has unknown transistor count and die size. The H100 NVL's base clock is 1080 MHz with a boost of 1785 MHz, whereas the LX PRO has no recorded base or boost clocks. Memory clocks differ: the H100 NVL runs at 1310 MHz (5.2 Gbps effective), while the LX PRO runs at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective).

Memory configuration: the H100 NVL has 94 GB HBM3 on a 6016-bit bus with 3.94 TB/s bandwidth; the LX PRO has 24 GB GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The H100 NVL has 16,896 shading units, 528 TMUs, 24 ROPs, and 528 tensor cores; the LX PRO has 6,144 shading units, 192 TMUs, 96 ROPs, and no tensor cores. Pixel rate favors the LX PRO at 192.0 GPixel/s versus 42.84 GPixel/s, while texture rate favors the H100 NVL at 942.5 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s. FP32 and FP16 both favor the H100 NVL (60.32 vs 24.58 TFLOPS FP32; 241.3 vs 49.15 TFLOPS FP16).

Power and connectivity: TDP is 400 W for the H100 NVL versus 225 W for the LX PRO. The H100 NVL uses an 8-pin EPS power connector and suggests an 800 W PSU; the LX PRO uses a 1x 16-pin connector and suggests a 550 W PSU. The H100 NVL uses PCIe 5.0 x16, while the LX PRO uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The H100 NVL has no display outputs, while the LX PRO has 4x DisplayPort 1.4a. The H100 NVL lists no DirectX, OpenGL, or Vulkan support; the LX PRO supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3. Dimensions: the H100 NVL is 267 mm long and 111 mm high; the LX PRO is 248 mm long, 118 mm high, and 48 mm wide. Both are dual-slot. Release dates differ: 2023-03-20 for the H100 NVL and 2026-03-16 for the LX PRO. The H100 NVL's predecessor is listed as Server Ada and successor as Server Blackwell, while the LX PRO has no predecessor or successor. The H100 NVL has a production status of Active, as does the LX PRO.

The Verdict

The recorded data points to a clear split in intended use cases. The NVIDIA H100 NVL 94 GB is the superior compute accelerator for FP32 and FP16 workloads, with 2.45x and 4.9x advantages respectively over the Lisuan Tech LX PRO. Its 94 GB HBM3 memory with 3.94 TB/s bandwidth enables processing of far larger datasets and models than the LX PRO's 24 GB GDDR6 with 432.0 GB/s. The H100 NVL's 528 tensor cores and lack of display outputs confirm its role as a server-side AI and scientific computing part, built for maximum throughput in data center environments. The 400 W TDP and 800 W suggested PSU align with that positioning.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO, with its 96 ROPs, 4.5x higher pixel rate, and 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, is clearly oriented toward graphics and workstation duties. Its support for DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3, combined with a lower 225 W TDP and smaller footprint, suggests it can serve as a conventional GPU for rendering or display tasks. However, its 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 are substantially lower, and the absence of tensor cores limits its AI acceleration potential.

The database shows no direct benchmark wins for either side, and both sit at the 50th percentile with an average benchmark score of zero. Given the specification data, the H100 NVL should be selected for compute-heavy server workloads, AI model training, or large-scale scientific simulation where memory bandwidth and FP16 throughput are paramount. The LX PRO should be selected for workstation-class graphics, direct display output, or applications requiring rasterization performance and standard graphics API support. The choice depends on whether the workload demands raw compute density or pixel output and display connectivity.