NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D vs NVIDIA RTX 6000D Comparison

NVIDIA
GEFORCE

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D

CORE STATE GB202
VRAM 32 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2407 MHz
TDP 575 W
BUS WIDTH 512 bit
ARCHITECTURE Blackwell 2.0
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

RTX 6000D

CORE STATE GB202
VRAM 84 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2430 MHz
TDP 600 W
BUS WIDTH 448 bit
ARCHITECTURE Blackwell 2.0
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
14,326
3,522
geekbench_opencl
310,674
388,405
geekbench_vulkan
376,915
N/A
passmark_directx_10
231
N/A
passmark_directx_11
371
N/A
passmark_directx_12
219
N/A
passmark_directx_9
434
N/A
passmark_g2d
1,487
N/A
passmark_g3d
44,065
N/A
passmark_gpu_compute
28,396
N/A

Analysis: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D vs NVIDIA RTX 6000D

The NVIDIA RTX 6000D and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D share the same underlying silicon, but they are tuned and configured for different workloads. The database shows a clear split: the RTX 5090 D dominates in one synthetic DirectX 12 test, while the RTX 6000D leads decisively in OpenCL compute. Both cards sit in the top percentile of all GPUs, yet their average benchmark scores diverge sharply, which reflects their distinct design goals. This analysis compares the recorded data to help decide which card fits a specific build.

FAQ

Q: Which card has more memory?

A: The RTX 6000D has 84 GB of GDDR7 memory, while the RTX 5090 D has 32 GB of GDDR7 memory. The RTX 6000D also uses a 448-bit bus, whereas the RTX 5090 D uses a 512-bit bus.

Q: Which card has a higher boost clock?

A: The RTX 6000D has a boost clock of 2430 MHz, while the RTX 5090 D boosts to 2407 MHz. The base clocks are 1992 MHz and 2017 MHz, respectively.

Q: How do their benchmark scores compare?

A: In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the RTX 5090 D scores 14326 versus 3522 for the RTX 6000D, a delta of -75.4% for the latter. In Geekbench OpenCL, the RTX 6000D scores 388405 versus 310674 for the RTX 5090 D, a 25% advantage.

Q: What is the power draw difference?

A: The RTX 6000D has a TDP of 600 W, and the RTX 5090 D has a TDP of 575 W. The suggested PSU is 1000 W for the RTX 6000D and 950 W for the RTX 5090 D.

Q: Which card has more shading units?

A: The RTX 5090 D has 21760 shading units, while the RTX 6000D has 19968. The RTX 5090 D also has more tensor cores (680 versus 624) and more RT cores (170 versus 156).

Q: Do they use the same display outputs?

A: No. The RTX 6000D provides 4x DisplayPort 2.1b, while the RTX 5090 D provides 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b.

Architecture Differences

Both cards are built on the GB202 chip with the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. They share identical transistor counts of 92,200 million and the same die size of 750 mm², yielding a transistor density of 122.9M per mm². The silicon is the same, but the configuration diverges.

The RTX 6000D is part of the Blackwell PRO W (x000) generation, aimed at professional workloads. The RTX 5090 D belongs to the GeForce 50 series, targeting consumer and gaming scenarios. This difference in product positioning drives the hardware choices.

The RTX 5090 D has more compute resources: 21760 shading units, 680 TMUs, and 680 tensor cores, compared to the RTX 6000D’s 19968 shading units, 624 TMUs, and 624 tensor cores. The RTX 5090 D also has more RT cores (170 versus 156) but fewer ROPs (176 versus 192). The RTX 6000D compensates with a higher pixel rate of 466.6 GPixel/s versus 423.6 GPixel/s, while the RTX 5090 D leads in texture rate at 1,636.8 GTexel/s versus 1,516.3 GTexel/s.

Memory architecture differs significantly. The RTX 6000D offers 84 GB of GDDR7 on a 448-bit bus, delivering 1.40 TB/s of bandwidth. The RTX 5090 D has 32 GB of GDDR7 on a 512-bit bus, providing 1.79 TB/s. The RTX 6000D runs memory at 1560 MHz (25 Gbps effective), while the RTX 5090 D runs at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective). The larger bus on the RTX 5090 D gives it higher bandwidth despite less capacity.

Clock speeds are close. The RTX 6000D has a base of 1992 MHz and boost of 2430 MHz. The RTX 5090 D has a base of 2017 MHz and boost of 2407 MHz. The boost advantage on the RTX 6000D is 23 MHz, a small margin. The FP32 compute reflects the shading unit counts: 97.04 TFLOPS for the RTX 6000D versus 104.8 TFLOPS for the RTX 5090 D. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Physical design is nearly identical in length and height, both at 304 mm and 137 mm. The width differs: 40 mm for the RTX 6000D and 48 mm for the RTX 5090 D. Both are dual-slot cards with a single 16-pin power connector. The RTX 6000D was released on 2025-07-13, while the RTX 5090 D came earlier on 2025-01-29. The RTX 6000D’s predecessor is Workstation Ada, and the RTX 5090 D’s predecessor is GeForce 40, with a successor of GeForce 60.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded head-to-head data shows two tests, one for each card. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test strongly favors the RTX 5090 D. It scores 14326, while the RTX 6000D scores 3522, a delta of -75.4% for the RTX 6000D. This is a massive gap, indicating that the RTX 5090 D’s higher shading unit count and texture rate translate into superior performance in this specific DirectX 12 workload. The RTX 5090 D’s 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 compute versus 97.04 TFLOPS likely contributes to this outcome, as does its higher memory bandwidth of 1.79 TB/s versus 1.40 TB/s.

The Geekbench OpenCL test flips the result. The RTX 6000D scores 388405, while the RTX 5090 D scores 310674. The RTX 6000D leads by 25%. This is a substantial advantage in a compute-oriented benchmark. The RTX 6000D’s larger memory capacity of 84 GB may be a factor, as OpenCL workloads can benefit from larger buffers. The higher pixel rate of 466.6 GPixel/s on the RTX 6000D versus 423.6 GPixel/s on the RTX 5090 D also suggests stronger rasterization throughput per clock, which can affect compute tasks.

The delta percentages are telling. A -75.4% delta in Steel Nomad means the RTX 5090 D is roughly four times faster in that test. A 25% delta in OpenCL means the RTX 6000D is a quarter faster in that test. These are not marginal differences; they point to specialized strengths. The RTX 5090 D’s win count is 1, and the RTX 6000D’s win count is 1, so the head-to-head record is tied.

Looking at the broader benchmark data, the RTX 5090 D has more recorded tests. Its PassMark scores include DirectX 10 at 231, DirectX 11 at 371, DirectX 12 at 219, DirectX 9 at 434, G2D at 1487, G3D at 44065, and GPU Compute at 28396. It also has a Geekbench Vulkan score of 376915. The RTX 6000D only has two recorded benchmarks: 3DMark Steel Nomad and Geekbench OpenCL. This limited dataset means the RTX 6000D’s average benchmark score of 195964 is based on fewer points, while the RTX 5090 D’s average of 77712 includes many lower-scoring tests like PassMark DirectX 9 at 434.

The percentile rankings reflect these averages. The RTX 6000D sits at the 98th percentile of all GPUs, while the RTX 5090 D sits at the 92nd percentile. The RTX 6000D’s nearest rivals include the NVIDIA Tesla V100S PCIe 32 GB with an average score of 194415 and a delta of 0.8%, the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB at 187147 with a 4.7% delta, the NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB at 207124 with a -5.4% delta, and the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation at 184664 with a 6.1% delta. The RTX 5090 D’s nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX 6650M XT at 76904 with a 1.1% delta, the AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT at 78940 with a -1.6% delta, the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB at 79396 with a -2.1% delta, and the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB at 79605 with a -2.4% delta.

These rival comparisons show that the RTX 6000D competes with data center GPUs like the A100 and V100S, while the RTX 5090 D competes with mobile and older workstation parts. The RTX 6000D’s average score is 2.5 times higher than the RTX 5090 D’s average, which is driven by the Geekbench OpenCL result being so high.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ in several key fields. Memory size is the most obvious: 84 GB on the RTX 6000D versus 32 GB on the RTX 5090 D. The memory bus width is 448 bit versus 512 bit, and memory bandwidth is 1.40 TB/s versus 1.79 TB/s. Memory clock differs: 1560 MHz (25 Gbps effective) for the RTX 6000D and 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective) for the RTX 5090 D.

Shading units: 19968 versus 21760. TMUs: 624 versus 680. ROPs: 192 versus 176. RT cores: 156 versus 170. Tensor cores: 624 versus 680. Pixel rate: 466.6 GPixel/s versus 423.6 GPixel/s. Texture rate: 1,516.3 GTexel/s versus 1,636.8 GTexel/s. FP32 and FP16 compute: 97.04 TFLOPS versus 104.8 TFLOPS, both at 1:1 ratio.

Base clock: 1992 MHz versus 2017 MHz. Boost clock: 2430 MHz versus 2407 MHz. TDP: 600 W versus 575 W. Suggested PSU: 1000 W versus 950 W. Card width: 40 mm versus 48 mm. Display outputs: 4x DisplayPort 2.1b versus 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b.

Release date: 2025-07-13 for the RTX 6000D and 2025-01-29 for the RTX 5090 D. Generation names differ: Blackwell PRO W (x000) versus GeForce 50. Predecessors differ: Workstation Ada versus GeForce 40. The RTX 5090 D has a successor listed as GeForce 60, while the RTX 6000D has none.

The RTX 6000D has a launch MSRP of 8,565 USD. The RTX 5090 D has a launch MSRP of 2,299 USD. Both use PCIe 5.0 x16, a single 16-pin connector, and are dual-slot. Both are active in production.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 5090 D wins in scenarios that demand raw rasterization and gaming performance. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 14326 is over four times higher than the RTX 6000D’s 3522. The higher shading unit count (21760 versus 19968) and texture rate (1,636.8 GTexel/s versus 1,516.3 GTexel/s) support this. The 1.79 TB/s memory bandwidth also helps in bandwidth-heavy scenes. The RTX 5090 D’s higher FP32 compute of 104.8 TFLOPS versus 97.04 TFLOPS gives it a raw throughput edge. For a gaming rig or a workstation that prioritizes DirectX 12 frame rates, the RTX 5090 D is the choice based on the data.

The RTX 6000D wins in compute-heavy workloads that benefit from massive memory capacity and OpenCL execution. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 388405 is 25% higher than the RTX 5090 D’s 310674. The 84 GB of GDDR7 memory is a decisive factor for large datasets, simulations, or AI inference tasks that exceed the 32 GB limit of the RTX 5090 D. The higher pixel rate of 466.6 GPixel/s versus 423.6 GPixel/s suggests better fill-rate efficiency. The 98th percentile ranking, compared to the 92nd for the RTX 5090 D, indicates that the RTX 6000D performs closer to the top of the overall GPU pool in aggregated benchmarks. The RTX 6000D’s rivals are data center parts like the A100 and V100S, which points to its intended role in professional compute environments.

The RTX 5090 D’s nearest rivals are lower-tier parts like the RX 6650M XT and Tesla P100, which indicates that its average score of 77712 is pulled down by many legacy tests. The RTX 6000D’s average of 195964 is inflated by the single high OpenCL score. Therefore, the wins should be interpreted by workload type, not just averages. For DirectX 12 gaming or real-time rendering, the RTX 5090 D’s 14326 Steel Nomad score is unmatched by the RTX 6000D. For OpenCL compute, the RTX 6000D’s 25% lead is the deciding factor.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear split: the RTX 5090 D is the better card for DirectX 12 performance, and the RTX 6000D is the better card for compute capacity and OpenCL throughput. The RTX 5090 D delivers 14326 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, a score that dwarfs the RTX 6000D’s 3522. This makes it the obvious pick for gamers or developers who rely on DirectX 12 benchmarks. Its 21760 shading units and 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 provide the computational headroom for demanding real-time workloads.

The RTX 6000D counters with 388405 in Geekbench OpenCL, a 25% advantage over the RTX 5090 D. Its 84 GB memory capacity is the standout feature, allowing it to handle datasets that would exhaust the RTX 5090 D’s 32 GB. The 98th percentile ranking versus 92nd for the RTX 5090 D reinforces its position among the top-tier GPUs in the database. The RTX 6000D’s nearest rivals are A100 and V100S models, which are data center accelerators, while the RTX 5090 D’s rivals are consumer and mobile parts. This context shows that the RTX 6000D is built for sustained compute, not fast frame rendering.

The power draw is close: 600 W for the RTX 6000D and 575 W for the RTX 5090 D, with suggested PSUs of 1000 W and 950 W respectively. The physical dimensions are identical in length and height, but the RTX 6000D is thinner at 40 mm versus 48 mm. The RTX 6000D offers four DisplayPort outputs, while the RTX 5090 D offers one HDMI and three DisplayPorts, which matters for multi-display professional setups.

The release dates differ, with the RTX 5090 D launching earlier on 2025-01-29 and the RTX 6000D following on 2025-07-13. The launch MSRP is 8,565 USD for the RTX 6000D and 2,299 USD for the RTX 5090 D, but any purchasing decision should be based on the benchmark data presented here. The RTX 6000D wins the compute test by 25%, and the RTX 5090 D wins the DirectX test by a 75.4% margin. Each card has one win in the head-to-head record.

For a build focused on gaming or real-time DirectX 12 applications, the RTX 5090 D is the superior choice, based on its 14326 Steel Nomad score. For a build focused on OpenCL compute, large memory footprints, or professional visualization workloads, the RTX 6000D is the better investment, based on its 388405 OpenCL score and 84 GB capacity. The data does not support a single winner across all tasks; the choice depends on the workload.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
RTX 5090 D
RTX 6000D
Core Specs
Shading Units
21,760
19,968 -8.2%
Shaders
21,760
19,968 -8.2%
TMUs
680
624 -8.2%
ROPs
176
192 +9.1%
SM Count
170
156 -8.2%
Clocks
Base Clock
2017 MHz
1992 MHz
Boost Clock
2407 MHz
2430 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz 28 Gbps effective
1560 MHz 25 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
32 GB
84 GB
VRAM (MB)
32,768
86,016 +162.5%
Memory Type
GDDR7
GDDR7
Memory Bus
512 bit
448 bit
Bandwidth
1.79 TB/s
1.40 TB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
96 MB
128 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
423.6 GPixel/s
466.6 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
1,636.8 GTexel/s
1,516.3 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
104.8 TFLOPS
97.04 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
1.637 TFLOPS (1:64)
1.516 TFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
104.8 TFLOPS (1:1)
97.04 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
170
156 -8.2%
Tensor Cores
680
624 -8.2%
Power
TDP
575 W
600 W
TDP (W)
575
600 +4.3%
Suggested PSU
950 W
1000 W
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
1x 16-pin
Architecture
Architecture
Blackwell 2.0
Blackwell 2.0
GPU Name
GB202
GB202
Generation
GeForce 50
Blackwell PRO W (x000)
Process Size
5 nm
5 nm
Transistors
92,200 million
92,200 million
Die Size
750 mm²
750 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
122.9M / mm²
122.9M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
12.0
12.0
Shader Model
6.9
6.9
Physical
Slot Width
Dual-slot
Dual-slot
Length
304 mm 12 inches
304 mm 12 inches
Height
137 mm 5.4 inches
137 mm 5.4 inches
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1b3x DisplayPort 2.1b
4x DisplayPort 2.1b
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
PCIe 5.0 x16
Other
Launch Price
2,299 USD
8,565 USD
Production
Active
Active
Predecessor
GeForce 40
Workstation Ada
Successor
GeForce 60
—
View GeForce RTX 5090 D Details View RTX 6000D Details