NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Comparison

NVIDIA
GEFORCE

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080

CORE STATE GB203
VRAM 16 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2617 MHz
TDP 360 W
BUS WIDTH 256 bit
ARCHITECTURE Blackwell 2.0
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

RTX A2000

CORE STATE GA106
VRAM 6 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1200 MHz
TDP 70 W
BUS WIDTH 192 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ampere
nm
PROCESS 8 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2021

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
8,637
1,345
geekbench_opencl
235,901
67,695
geekbench_vulkan
255,450
69,089
passmark_directx_10
208
N/A
passmark_directx_11
324
N/A
passmark_directx_12
151
N/A
passmark_directx_9
389
N/A
passmark_g2d
1,415
N/A
passmark_g3d
36,565
N/A
passmark_gpu_compute
21,789
N/A

Analysis: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a decisive sweep for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 across all three shared benchmark tests. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the RTX 5080 scores 8,637 points against the RTX A2000's 1,345, a delta of 542.2%. This is the largest relative gap in the comparison, indicating that the RTX 5080 delivers over six times the raw graphics performance in this DirectX 12 workload.

The Geekbench OpenCL test tells a similar story, with the RTX 5080 posting 235,901 points versus 67,695 for the RTX A2000, a 248.5% advantage. The Vulkan results follow suit: 255,450 versus 69,089, a 269.7% lead. These numbers show that the RTX 5080's dominance is not confined to a single API or workload type; it extends across both OpenCL and Vulkan, suggesting a broad architectural advantage rather than a narrow optimization for one test.

It is notably the RTX A2000's performance profile places it in a different competitive tier entirely. Its average benchmark score of 46,043 sits within 1.2% of the AMD Radeon RX 5600M and Intel Arc A530M, while the RTX 5080's average of 56,083 is only 0.6% ahead of the AMD Radeon 8060S and 0.7% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB. In other words, the RTX 5080 competes with recent high-end AMD parts, while the RTX A2000 trades blows with mid-range laptop GPUs from the previous generation.

The percentile rankings reinforce this split. The RTX 5080 sits at the 87th percentile among all GPUs in the database, while the RTX A2000 ranks at the 85th percentile. Although the percentile difference appears modest, the absolute score gap is enormous; the percentile metric likely reflects the wide distribution of GPUs in the database, where many entries cluster around lower performance levels.

The Verdict

Based strictly on the benchmark data, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 is the clear performance winner in every measured category. It wins all three head-to-head tests, and its average benchmark score of 56,083 is roughly 22% higher than the RTX A2000's 46,043. The RTX 5080 also carries a newer architecture, more memory, and a higher transistor count, all of which align with its superior results.

The RTX A2000, however, is not without a role. Its 70 W TDP, lack of power connectors, and compact dimensions make it a fundamentally different product. The data shows it is end-of-life, released in August 2021, while the RTX 5080 launched in January 2025 and remains active. The choice between the two depends entirely on context: the RTX 5080 is for workloads that demand maximum throughput, while the RTX A2000 is for environments where power and space constraints dominate.

There is no scenario in the recorded data where the RTX A2000 outperforms the RTX 5080. The verdict is straightforward: the RTX 5080 is the superior GPU for any task where performance is the priority. The RTX A2000's appeal lies in its operational profile, not its benchmark results.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 5080 wins in every performance category measured. Its 16 GB of GDDR7 memory with 960.0 GB/s of bandwidth dwarfs the RTX A2000's 6 GB of GDDR6 at 288.0 GB/s. The shading unit count of 10,752 versus 3,328, the 336 tensor cores versus 104, and the 84 RT cores versus 26 all point to the same conclusion: the RTX 5080 is designed for compute-heavy and graphics-intensive tasks, and the data confirms it delivers.

The RTX A2000 wins in operational efficiency. Its 70 W TDP is a fraction of the RTX 5080's 360 W, and it requires no external power connectors, drawing solely from the PCIe slot. Its suggested PSU is 250 W versus 750 W for the RTX 5080. The RTX A2000 measures 167 mm in length and 69 mm in height, versus 304 mm and 137 mm for the RTX 5080. For a small form factor workstation or a system with limited power delivery, the RTX A2000 is the only viable option among the two.

The RTX A2000 also supports four mini-DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, while the RTX 5080 offers one HDMI 2.1b and three DisplayPort 2.1b outputs. The RTX A2000's display configuration may suit multi-monitor workstation setups that rely on DisplayPort, though the RTX 5080's newer output standard offers higher bandwidth per connection.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 has an average benchmark score of 56,083, while the NVIDIA RTX A2000 scores 46,043, a difference of roughly 22%.

Q: How large is the performance gap in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12?

A: The RTX 5080 scores 8,637 points versus 1,345 for the RTX A2000, a delta of 542.2%. This is the largest margin in any shared test.

Q: What is the memory configuration difference?

A: The RTX 5080 has 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus with 960.0 GB/s bandwidth. The RTX A2000 has 6 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Which GPU requires less power?

A: The RTX A2000 has a TDP of 70 W and needs no external power connectors, with a suggested PSU of 250 W. The RTX 5080 has a TDP of 360 W, requires a 16-pin connector, and needs a 750 W PSU.

Q: Are these GPUs from the same architecture generation?

A: No. The RTX 5080 uses the GB203 chip on Blackwell 2.0 architecture built on a 5 nm process. The RTX A2000 uses the GA106 chip on Ampere architecture built on an 8 nm process.

Q: What is the production status of each card?

A: The RTX 5080 is listed as Active with a release date of January 29, 2025. The RTX A2000 is listed as End-of-life with a release date of August 9, 2021.

Architecture Differences

The RTX 5080 is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture with the GB203 chip, manufactured on a 5 nm process by TSMC. It contains 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 120.6 million per mm². The RTX A2000 uses the Ampere architecture with the GA106 chip, manufactured on an 8 nm process by Samsung. It contains 12,000 million transistors on a 276 mm² die, with a density of 43.5 million per mm².

The RTX 5080's shading unit count is 10,752, with 336 texture mapping units and 112 render output units. It has 84 RT cores and 336 tensor cores. The RTX A2000 has 3,328 shading units, 104 TMUs, 48 ROPs, 26 RT cores, and 104 tensor cores. These structural differences explain the performance gap: the RTX 5080 has over three times the shading units and over three times the tensor cores.

The clock behavior also differs significantly. The RTX 5080 has a base clock of 2295 MHz and a boost clock of 2617 MHz. The RTX A2000 has a base clock of just 562 MHz and a boost of 1200 MHz. The RTX 5080's memory runs at 1875 MHz (30 Gbps effective) versus 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) for the RTX A2000. These clock differences compound the architectural advantages.

The RTX 5080 supports PCIe 5.0 x16, while the RTX A2000 uses PCIe 4.0 x16. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so the API feature set is identical. The RTX 5080's predecessor is the GeForce 40 series, with the GeForce 60 series as its successor. The RTX A2000's predecessor is Quadro Turing, with Workstation Ada as its successor.

Specification Differences

The most consequential differences are in memory, power, and physical size. The RTX 5080 has 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus with 960.0 GB/s bandwidth. The RTX A2000 has 6 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. The RTX 5080's memory bandwidth is over three times higher.

The TDP figures are 360 W for the RTX 5080 versus 70 W for the RTX A2000. The RTX 5080 requires a 16-pin power connector and a 750 W suggested PSU, while the RTX A2000 has no power connectors and a 250 W suggested PSU. The RTX 5080 is a dual-slot card measuring 304 mm in length, 137 mm in height, and 40 mm in width. The RTX A2000 is also dual-slot but measures 167 mm in length and 69 mm in height, with no width listed.

The display outputs differ: the RTX 5080 has one HDMI 2.1b and three DisplayPort 2.1b outputs, while the RTX A2000 has four mini-DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. The bus interface is PCIe 5.0 x16 for the RTX 5080 versus PCIe 4.0 x16 for the RTX A2000. The transistor count, die size, and process node all differ substantially, as detailed in the architecture section. Finally, the RTX 5080's launch MSRP is 999 USD, while the RTX A2000's launch MSRP is 449 USD.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
RTX 5080
RTX A2000
Core Specs
Shading Units
10,752
3,328 -69.0%
Shaders
10,752
3,328 -69.0%
TMUs
336
104 -69.0%
ROPs
112
48 -57.1%
SM Count
84
26 -69.0%
Clocks
Base Clock
2295 MHz
562 MHz
Boost Clock
2617 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1875 MHz 30 Gbps effective
1500 MHz 12 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
16 GB
6 GB
VRAM (MB)
16,384
6,144 -62.5%
Memory Type
GDDR7
GDDR6
Memory Bus
256 bit
192 bit
Bandwidth
960.0 GB/s
288.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
64 MB
3 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
293.1 GPixel/s
57.60 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
879.3 GTexel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
56.28 TFLOPS
7.987 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
879.3 GFLOPS (1:64)
124.8 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
56.28 TFLOPS (1:1)
7.987 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
84
26 -69.0%
Tensor Cores
336
104 -69.0%
Power
TDP
360 W
70 W
TDP (W)
360
70 -80.6%
Suggested PSU
750 W
250 W
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
None
Architecture
Architecture
Blackwell 2.0
Ampere
GPU Name
GB203
GA106
Generation
GeForce 50
Workstation Ampere (Ax000)
Process Size
5 nm
8 nm
Transistors
45,600 million
12,000 million
Die Size
378 mm²
276 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Samsung
Density
120.6M / mm²
43.5M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
12.0
8.6
Shader Model
6.9
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
Dual-slot
Dual-slot
Length
304 mm 12 inches
167 mm 6.6 inches
Height
137 mm 5.4 inches
69 mm 2.7 inches
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1b3x DisplayPort 2.1b
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
PCIe 4.0 x16
Other
Launch Price
999 USD
449 USD
Production
Active
End-of-life
Predecessor
GeForce 40
Quadro Turing
Successor
GeForce 60
Workstation Ada
View GeForce RTX 5080 Details View RTX A2000 Details