GPU Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon 780M

CORE STATE Phoenix
VRAM System Shared
CLOCK SPEED 2700 MHz
TDP 15 W
BUS WIDTH System Shared
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 3.0
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2023
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

GeForce RTX 5070

CORE STATE GB205
VRAM 12 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2512 MHz
TDP 250 W
BUS WIDTH 192 bit
ARCHITECTURE Blackwell 2.0
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
480
5,077
geekbench_opencl
25,770
185,269
geekbench_vulkan
30,921
179,413
passmark_directx_10
N/A
180
passmark_directx_11
N/A
277
passmark_directx_12
N/A
108
passmark_directx_9
N/A
320
passmark_g2d
N/A
1,305
passmark_g3d
N/A
29,137
passmark_gpu_compute
N/A
15,787

Analysis: AMD Radeon 780M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070

Visual performance benchmarks between RTX 5070 from NVIDIA and AMD Radeon 780M (AMD) demonstrate a decisive victor. RTX 5070 from NVIDIA offers significantly superior FPS in modern gaming benchmarks. This memory superiority and technical enhancements result into visibly better rendering quality. Benchmark numbers validates this observation. Gamers looking for high-end performance should pay attention.

This memory advantage of RTX 5070 from NVIDIA turns increasingly relevant at higher quality levels. Ultra HD gaming needs substantial memory, and RTX 5070 from NVIDIA delivers more headroom. This converts into enhanced gameplay in memory-intensive games. Upcoming titles might only consume extra graphics memory. This benefit increases over time.

In-game benchmarks across multiple games consistently advantage RTX 5070 from NVIDIA. Whether it's competitive genres to blockbuster games, RTX 5070 from NVIDIA preserves its superiority. This performance consistency throughout various scenarios proves fundamental engineering superiority. Enthusiasts can anticipate excellent results no matter of scenario. The versatility is remarkable.

AMD Radeon 780M (AMD) shouldn't be overlooked fully, though its performance gap against RTX 5070 from NVIDIA is tough to ignore. In price-aware users, AMD Radeon 780M (AMD) might nonetheless offer value provided its reduced cost makes up for its lesser capabilities. However, for pure gaming performance, RTX 5070 from NVIDIA represents the definite champion. This conclusion is obvious. Capability chasers would shift toward RTX 5070 from NVIDIA.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
780M
RTX 5070
Core Specs
Shading Units
768
6,144 +700.0%
Shaders
768
6,144 +700.0%
TMUs
48
192 +300.0%
ROPs
32
80 +150.0%
Compute Units
12
SM Count
48
Clocks
Base Clock
800 MHz
2325 MHz
Boost Clock
2700 MHz
2512 MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared
1750 MHz 28 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
System Shared
12 GB
VRAM (MB)
12,288
Memory Type
System Shared
GDDR7
Memory Bus
System Shared
192 bit
Bandwidth
System Dependent
672.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
2 MB
48 MB
L0 Cache
32 KB per WGP
Performance
Pixel Rate
86.40 GPixel/s
201.0 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
129.6 GTexel/s
482.3 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
8.294 TFLOPS
30.87 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
518.4 GFLOPS (1:16)
482.3 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
16.59 TFLOPS (2:1)
30.87 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
12
48 +300.0%
Tensor Cores
192
Power
TDP
15 W
250 W
TDP (W)
15
250 +1566.7%
Suggested PSU
600 W
Power Connectors
None
1x 16-pin
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
Blackwell 2.0
GPU Name
Phoenix
GB205
Generation
Navi III IGP (Phoenix Mobile)
GeForce 50
Process Size
4 nm
5 nm
Transistors
25,390 million
31,100 million
Die Size
178 mm²
263 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
142.6M / mm²
118.3M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.1
3.0
CUDA
12.0
Shader Model
6.8
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
Dual-slot
Length
245 mm 9.6 inches
Height
115 mm 4.5 inches
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x HDMI 2.1b3x DisplayPort 2.1b
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 5.0 x16
Other
Launch Price
549 USD
Production
Active
Active
Predecessor
Navi II IGP
GeForce 40
Successor
Navi III IGP
View Radeon 780M Details View GeForce RTX 5070 Details