NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti vs NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile Comparison

The NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti occupy entirely different tiers of the GPU market, and the benchmark data reflects a decisive performance gap. In the two recorded head-to-head tests, the RTX 5070 Ti wins both, with the A3000 Mobile trailing by 62.8% in Geekbench OpenCL and 72.8% in Geekbench Vulkan. The RTX 5070 Ti posts an average benchmark score of 49,957, while the A3000 Mobile averages 70,140, a discrepancy explained by the fact that the A3000 Mobile has only two benchmark entries, both of which score highly relative to its own field, whereas the RTX 5070 Ti includes several lower-scoring DirectX and 2D tests that pull its average down. Despite this, the RTX 5070 Ti holds a higher percentile rank among all GPUs at 86, compared to the A3000 Mobile’s 91, indicating that the mobile card’s limited test set overstates its relative position.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU is faster in compute benchmarks?

A: The GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is significantly faster. It scores 212,363 in Geekbench OpenCL versus 79,091 for the RTX A3000 Mobile, a margin of 62.8%. In Geekbench Vulkan, the RTX 5070 Ti scores 225,122 against 61,189, a 72.8% lead.

Q: What is the architectural generation of each card?

A: The RTX A3000 Mobile uses the Ampere architecture (chip GA104) on an 8 nm Samsung process. The RTX 5070 Ti uses the Blackwell 2.0 architecture (chip GB203) on a 5 nm TSMC process.

Q: How do their memory subsystems compare?

A: The RTX A3000 Mobile has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 264.0 GB/s bandwidth. The RTX 5070 Ti has 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 896.0 GB/s bandwidth, which is 3.4 times the bandwidth of the A3000 Mobile.

Q: What is the power consumption difference?

A: The RTX A3000 Mobile has a TDP of 70 W, while the RTX 5070 Ti has a TDP of 300 W. The RTX 5070 Ti also requires a 700 W suggested power supply and uses a 16-pin power connector, whereas the A3000 Mobile has no power connectors listed.

Q: Which card has more shading units and ray tracing cores?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti has 8,960 shading units and 70 RT cores. The RTX A3000 Mobile has 4,096 shading units and 32 RT cores. The RTX 5070 Ti also has 280 tensor cores versus 128 on the A3000 Mobile.

Q: What are the release dates and production statuses?

A: The RTX A3000 Mobile was released on April 11, 2021, and is end-of-life. The RTX 5070 Ti was released on February 19, 2025, and is active. The RTX 5070 Ti has a launch MSRP of 749 USD.

The Verdict

The data leads to a straightforward conclusion: the GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is the superior performer in every recorded benchmark. For users prioritizing raw compute throughput, the RTX 5070 Ti delivers more than double the OpenCL score and more than triple the Vulkan score of the RTX A3000 Mobile. The RTX 5070 Ti also offers substantially more memory, higher bandwidth, and a newer architecture with more cores across every functional unit.

The RTX A3000 Mobile, however, is not without merit. Its 70 W TDP makes it suitable for portable workstation deployments where power constraints dominate. The A3000 Mobile’s average benchmark score of 70,140 is higher than the RTX 5070 Ti’s 49,957 because the A3000 Mobile’s two benchmarks are both compute-heavy tests that play to its strengths, while the RTX 5070 Ti’s ten benchmarks include legacy DirectX 9, DirectX 10, and 2D tests that score low and drag its average down. In the nearest rival comparison, the A3000 Mobile sits 0.2% above the Quadro P6000 and 0.4% above the Radeon Pro WX 8200, while the RTX 5070 Ti sits 0.1% below the Radeon RX Vega 64 and 0.4% above the Intel Arc A550M. These rival positions confirm that the A3000 Mobile competes in a professional mobile segment, while the RTX 5070 Ti competes in a desktop enthusiast segment.

Who should pick which? The RTX 5070 Ti is the choice for anyone needing maximum compute performance, large memory capacity, and modern feature support. The A3000 Mobile is the choice for constrained power environments or legacy mobile workstation integration where the 70 W envelope is a hard requirement. The RTX 5070 Ti’s 300 W TDP and dual-slot cooler make it unsuitable for such deployments, while the A3000 Mobile’s portable-device-dependent display outputs and lack of dedicated power connectors reflect its embedded mobile nature.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

Two direct comparisons exist in the database, and the RTX 5070 Ti wins both decisively.

In Geekbench OpenCL, the RTX 5070 Ti scores 212,363, while the RTX A3000 Mobile scores 79,091. This represents a 62.8% advantage for the RTX 5070 Ti. The gap is consistent with the raw compute specifications: the RTX 5070 Ti has 8,960 shading units versus 4,096, and an FP32 throughput of 43.94 TFLOPS versus 10.08 TFLOPS. The RTX 5070 Ti’s FP32 output is 4.36 times higher, which aligns with the observed benchmark differential.

In Geekbench Vulkan, the RTX 5070 Ti scores 225,122, while the RTX A3000 Mobile scores 61,189. This is a 72.8% lead for the RTX 5070 Ti. The larger margin in Vulkan likely reflects the RTX 5070 Ti’s superior memory bandwidth (896.0 GB/s versus 264.0 GB/s) and its higher pixel rate (235.4 GPixel/s versus 78.72 GPixel/s). The RTX 5070 Ti also has 70 RT cores versus 32, which can accelerate certain Vulkan workloads, though the benchmark does not specify ray tracing usage.

The RTX 5070 Ti’s win count is 2, while the A3000 Mobile has 0 wins. No benchmark in the head-to-head set favors the A3000 Mobile. The average score of the RTX 5070 Ti across all its benchmarks is 49,957, but this figure includes low-scoring legacy tests such as Passmark DirectX 9 (351), DirectX 10 (192), and DirectX 11 (300). The A3000 Mobile’s average of 70,140 is derived solely from its two high compute scores, making direct average comparisons misleading. The percentile ranks clarify the picture: the RTX 5070 Ti ranks in the 86th percentile of all GPUs, while the A3000 Mobile ranks in the 91st percentile, but the A3000 Mobile’s percentile is based on a much smaller and more favorable benchmark selection.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ across nearly every measured specification. The RTX A3000 Mobile uses a GA104 chip built on an 8 nm Samsung process, while the RTX 5070 Ti uses a GB203 chip on a 5 nm TSMC process. Transistor counts differ dramatically: the A3000 Mobile has 17,400 million transistors on a 392 mm² die, while the RTX 5070 Ti has 45,600 million transistors on a smaller 378 mm² die. This yields a transistor density of 44.4M per mm² for the A3000 Mobile versus 120.6M per mm² for the RTX 5070 Ti.

Clock speeds are substantially higher on the RTX 5070 Ti. The base clock is 2,295 MHz versus 600 MHz, and the boost clock is 2,452 MHz versus 1,230 MHz. Memory clocks also differ: the A3000 Mobile runs at 1,375 MHz with 11 Gbps effective, while the RTX 5070 Ti runs at 1,750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective.

Memory capacity and type are major differentiators. The A3000 Mobile offers 6 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, achieving 264.0 GB/s. The RTX 5070 Ti offers 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus, achieving 896.0 GB/s.

Compute unit counts scale accordingly. The A3000 Mobile has 4,096 shading units, 128 TMUs, 64 ROPs, 32 RT cores, and 128 tensor cores. The RTX 5070 Ti has 8,960 shading units, 280 TMUs, 96 ROPs, 70 RT cores, and 280 tensor cores.

Pixel and texture rates reflect these differences. The A3000 Mobile achieves 78.72 GPixel/s and 157.4 GTexel/s. The RTX 5070 Ti achieves 235.4 GPixel/s and 686.6 GTexel/s.

Power and physical specifications diverge sharply. The A3000 Mobile has a 70 W TDP, no power connectors, and no listed slot width or dimensions. The RTX 5070 Ti has a 300 W TDP, a dual-slot cooler, a 16-pin power connector, a 700 W suggested PSU, and dimensions of 304 mm length, 137 mm height, and 48 mm width.

The bus interface also differs: PCIe 4.0 x16 for the A3000 Mobile versus PCIe 5.0 x16 for the RTX 5070 Ti. Display outputs are portable-device-dependent on the A3000 Mobile, while the RTX 5070 Ti offers 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gap spans three generations. The RTX A3000 Mobile is built on Ampere, NVIDIA’s second-generation RTX architecture, using the GA104 chip. The RTX 5070 Ti is built on Blackwell 2.0, using the GB203 chip. The foundry and process node changes from Samsung 8 nm to TSMC 5 nm, enabling a 2.7 times increase in transistor density.

Core composition changes are significant. The RTX 5070 Ti has 2.19 times the shading units, 2.19 times the TMUs, 1.5 times the ROPs, 2.19 times the RT cores, and 2.19 times the tensor cores compared to the A3000 Mobile. The FP32 and FP16 throughput are both 43.94 TFLOPS on the RTX 5070 Ti, representing a 4.36 times increase over the A3000 Mobile’s 10.08 TFLOPS.

Memory architecture shifts from GDDR6 to GDDR7. The RTX 5070 Ti’s 896.0 GB/s bandwidth is 3.39 times the A3000 Mobile’s 264.0 GB/s. The memory bus widens from 192-bit to 256-bit, and capacity quadruples from 6 GB to 16 GB.

The RTX 5070 Ti supports PCIe 5.0 x16, doubling the interface bandwidth available to the A3000 Mobile’s PCIe 4.0 x16. Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so API compatibility is identical.

The production lifecycle differs: the A3000 Mobile is end-of-life and was released in April 2021, while the RTX 5070 Ti is active and was released in February 2025. The A3000 Mobile’s predecessor is the Quadro Turing-M and its successor is Ada-MW. The RTX 5070 Ti’s predecessor is the GeForce 40 series and its successor is the GeForce 60 series.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 5070 Ti wins every recorded benchmark, making its case straightforward. It dominates in Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan, with margins of 62.8% and 72.8% respectively. For any compute-heavy workload represented by these tests, such as general-purpose GPU compute, graphics rendering, or machine learning inference, the RTX 5070 Ti is the clear choice. Its 16 GB memory capacity and 896.0 GB/s bandwidth also make it better suited for large datasets or high-resolution textures that would exceed the A3000 Mobile’s 6 GB frame buffer.

The RTX 5070 Ti’s 43.94 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, 235.4 GPixel/s pixel rate, and 686.6 GTexel/s texture rate indicate strong performance in rasterization and compute tasks alike. Its 70 RT cores and 280 tensor cores provide dedicated hardware for ray tracing and AI acceleration.

The RTX A3000 Mobile does not win any benchmark, but it holds advantages in specific deployment contexts. Its 70 W TDP is a fraction of the RTX 5070 Ti’s 300 W, making it viable for thermally constrained mobile workstations or embedded systems. The absence of power connectors and portable-device-dependent display outputs confirm its design for integration into laptops or custom portable hardware rather than desktop use.

The A3000 Mobile’s average score of 70,140 exceeds the RTX 5070 Ti’s 49,957, but this is a statistical artifact of test selection. The A3000 Mobile’s only two tests are high-scoring compute benchmarks, while the RTX 5070 Ti includes low-scoring legacy DirectX and 2D tests. In the nearest rival comparison, the A3000 Mobile sits 0.2% above the Quadro P6000 and 0.4% above the Radeon Pro WX 8200, indicating it is competitive within its professional mobile class. The RTX 5070 Ti sits 0.1% below the Radeon RX Vega 64 and 3.1% above the Radeon RX 6800 XT, positioning it firmly in the high-end desktop segment.

For users who need maximum compute performance and have access to desktop power delivery, the RTX 5070 Ti is the only rational choice. For users who prioritize low power consumption and mobile integration, the A3000 Mobile remains a functional option, though its end-of-life status and older architecture limit its future relevance. The data does not support any scenario where the A3000 Mobile outperforms the RTX 5070 Ti in raw speed.