NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti vs NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile Comparison

NVIDIA
GEFORCE

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti

CORE STATE GB203
VRAM 16 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2452 MHz
TDP 300 W
BUS WIDTH 256 bit
ARCHITECTURE Blackwell 2.0
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

RTX A1000 Mobile

CORE STATE GA107
VRAM 4 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1140 MHz
TDP 60 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ampere
nm
PROCESS 8 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2022

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
6,604
N/A
geekbench_opencl
212,363
48,703
geekbench_vulkan
225,122
46,782
passmark_directx_10
192
N/A
passmark_directx_11
300
N/A
passmark_directx_12
127
N/A
passmark_directx_9
351
N/A
passmark_g2d
1,332
N/A
passmark_g3d
32,974
N/A
passmark_gpu_compute
20,203
N/A

Analysis: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti vs NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is in a completely different performance class than the NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile, with benchmark data showing the desktop card leading by margins of 336% to 381% in the two shared tests. While the RTX A1000 Mobile holds a respectable 85th percentile ranking among all GPUs, the RTX 5070 Ti sits at the 86th percentile, yet the raw score gap is enormous, driven by the fact that one is a 300 W desktop flagship while the other is a 60 W mobile integrated part.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The only two benchmarks shared between these GPUs are Geekbench OpenCL and Geekbench Vulkan, and the RTX 5070 Ti wins both decisively. In Geekbench OpenCL, the RTX 5070 Ti scores 212,363 against the RTX A1000 Mobile's 48,703, a delta of 336%. That is not a marginal victory — it represents a four-fold-plus advantage in raw compute throughput, which aligns with the FP32 specification gap of 43.94 TFLOPS versus 4.669 TFLOPS.

The Vulkan result is even more lopsided. The RTX 5070 Ti posts 225,122, while the RTX A1000 Mobile manages 46,782, yielding a 381.2% lead for the desktop part. This wider margin in Vulkan suggests the RTX 5070 Ti's newer Blackwell 2.0 architecture extracts relatively more performance from the API than the older Ampere design, though both support Vulkan 1.4. The RTX A1000 Mobile's lower boost clock of 1140 MHz versus 2452 MHz on the RTX 5070 Ti is a primary contributor to this gap.

Looking at the average benchmark scores, the RTX 5070 Ti achieves 49,957 across all its tested workloads, while the RTX A1000 Mobile averages 47,743. This 4.6% difference in average score is misleadingly small because the RTX 5070 Ti's benchmark suite includes many more demanding DirectX tests (PassMark DX9 through DX12) that the mobile part never ran. The nearest rival data confirms this: the RTX 5070 Ti sits within 0.1% of the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 (50,001) and 0.4% ahead of the Intel Arc A550M (49,737), while the RTX A1000 Mobile is 1.5% behind the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT (48,477) and 2.2% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6550M (46,702).

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 5070 Ti wins every benchmark category where both were tested, which makes a use-case split straightforward. For any task that leverages OpenCL or Vulkan — including general GPU compute, rendering workloads, and Vulkan-based games — the RTX 5070 Ti is categorically superior. Its 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus delivers 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth, compared to 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus at 176.0 GB/s, which means memory-bound workloads see a five-fold bandwidth advantage.

The RTX A1000 Mobile's only realistic wins are contextual rather than benchmark-based. As an IGP (integrated graphics processor) with a 60 W TDP and no power connectors, it is designed for portable workstations where the RTX 5070 Ti's 300 W TDP and dual-slot footprint are physically impossible. The mobile part also supports portable-device-dependent display outputs, whereas the desktop card requires HDMI 2.1b and DisplayPort 2.1b connections. In the PassMark suite, the RTX 5070 Ti shows strengths across API generations: 351 in DX9, 300 in DX11, 192 in DX10, and 127 in DX12, with a G3D score of 32,974 and a GPU compute score of 20,203. The RTX A1000 Mobile has no PassMark results, so no direct comparison is possible there.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gap is generational. The RTX 5070 Ti uses the GB203 chip built on Blackwell 2.0 architecture, manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The RTX A1000 Mobile uses the GA107 chip on Ampere architecture, built on an 8 nm process at Samsung. This process difference alone — 5 nm versus 8 nm — contributes to the RTX 5070 Ti's transistor density of 120.6 million per mm² versus the mobile part's 43.5 million per mm².

The RTX 5070 Ti packs 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die, while the RTX A1000 Mobile has 8,700 million transistors on a 200 mm² die. That is a 5.2x transistor count advantage for the desktop part, concentrated in a die that is only 1.89x larger. The shading unit count tells a similar story: 8,960 shading units on the RTX 5070 Ti versus 2,048 on the RTX A1000 Mobile. RT cores number 70 versus 16, and tensor cores number 280 versus 64. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so API-level features are identical even though the underlying hardware generations differ.

The RTX 5070 Ti is part of the GeForce 50-series, succeeding the GeForce 40 series and preceding the GeForce 60 series. The RTX A1000 Mobile belongs to the Ampere-MW (Ax000) generation, succeeding Quadro Turing-M and preceding Ada-MW. The production status also differs: the RTX 5070 Ti is Active, while the RTX A1000 Mobile is End-of-life.

Specification Differences

Beyond the architectural divide, the specification sheets diverge on nearly every measurable field. The RTX 5070 Ti has a base clock of 2295 MHz and a boost clock of 2452 MHz, while the RTX A1000 Mobile runs at 630 MHz base and 1140 MHz boost. Memory configurations are starkly different: 16 GB GDDR7 at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective) versus 4 GB GDDR6 at 1375 MHz (11 Gbps effective). The bus width is 256-bit versus 128-bit, producing bandwidth of 896.0 GB/s versus 176.0 GB/s.

Compute rates reflect the hardware gap. The RTX 5070 Ti achieves 43.94 TFLOPS in both FP32 and FP16 (1:1 ratio), while the RTX A1000 Mobile achieves 4.669 TFLOPS in both. Pixel rate is 235.4 GPixel/s versus 36.48 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 686.6 GTexel/s versus 72.96 GTexel/s. The desktop card has 280 TMUs and 96 ROPs, while the mobile part has 64 TMUs and 32 ROPs.

Power and physical specs are where the mobile part's design intent becomes clear. The RTX 5070 Ti consumes 300 W, requires a 700 W suggested PSU, uses a 1x 16-pin power connector, and is dual-slot with dimensions of 304 mm x 137 mm x 48 mm. The RTX A1000 Mobile consumes 60 W, has no power connectors, is IGP form factor, and lists no dimensions. The bus interface is PCIe 5.0 x16 for the desktop part versus PCIe 4.0 x8 for the mobile part. The RTX 5070 Ti launched on 2025-02-19 with a launch MSRP of 749 USD; the RTX A1000 Mobile launched on 2022-03-29 with no MSRP listed.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti averages 49,957 across its benchmark suite, while the NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile averages 47,743. This is a 4.6% difference, but the RTX 5070 Ti was tested on more demanding DirectX workloads that the mobile part did not run.

Q: How much faster is the RTX 5070 Ti in Vulkan?

A: In Geekbench Vulkan, the RTX 5070 Ti scores 225,122 versus the RTX A1000 Mobile's 46,782, which is a 381.2% lead for the desktop card.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti delivers 896.0 GB/s from 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus, while the RTX A1000 Mobile provides 176.0 GB/s from 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus.

Q: Are both GPUs in the same performance percentile?

A: No, the RTX 5070 Ti is at the 86th percentile of all GPUs, while the RTX A1000 Mobile is at the 85th percentile. Despite the close percentiles, the actual score gap is massive because the percentile ranking is relative to different benchmark pools.

Q: Which GPU has more RT cores?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti has 70 RT cores, compared to 16 RT cores on the RTX A1000 Mobile. The Tensor core count is 280 versus 64.

Q: What is the process node for each GPU?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti uses a 5 nm process at TSMC, while the RTX A1000 Mobile uses an 8 nm process at Samsung.

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous: for any user who can accommodate a 300 W, dual-slot desktop card, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is the superior choice by every measurable benchmark metric. It leads by 336% in OpenCL and 381.2% in Vulkan, offers 10x the FP32 compute (43.94 TFLOPS versus 4.669 TFLOPS), and provides 16 GB of GDDR7 memory versus 4 GB of GDDR6. The RTX 5070 Ti also carries forward the GeForce 50-series lineage with Active production status, while the RTX A1000 Mobile is End-of-life.

The NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile is only defensible in one scenario: when the physical constraints of a portable workstation demand a 60 W IGP with no power connectors and no dedicated slot width. Its 85th percentile ranking shows it is not a weak part — it sits within 1.5% of the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT in average score — but that comparison flatters it because its benchmark pool is far smaller. The RTX A1000 Mobile's 4 GB memory capacity and 176.0 GB/s bandwidth will bottleneck modern workloads, and its 1140 MHz boost clock caps its ceiling. For desktop users, the choice is the RTX 5070 Ti without qualification; for mobile users, the RTX A1000 Mobile is the only option that fits the power envelope, but it should be chosen for portability, not performance. The RTX 5070 Ti is the winner in every head-to-head test, and the data shows no scenario where the mobile part competes on raw throughput.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
RTX 5070 Ti
RTX A1000 Mobile
Core Specs
Shading Units
8,960
2,048 -77.1%
Shaders
8,960
2,048 -77.1%
TMUs
280
64 -77.1%
ROPs
96
32 -66.7%
SM Count
70
16 -77.1%
Clocks
Base Clock
2295 MHz
630 MHz
Boost Clock
2452 MHz
1140 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz 28 Gbps effective
1375 MHz 11 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
16 GB
4 GB
VRAM (MB)
16,384
4,096 -75.0%
Memory Type
GDDR7
GDDR6
Memory Bus
256 bit
128 bit
Bandwidth
896.0 GB/s
176.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
48 MB
2 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
235.4 GPixel/s
36.48 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
686.6 GTexel/s
72.96 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
43.94 TFLOPS
4.669 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
686.6 GFLOPS (1:64)
72.96 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
43.94 TFLOPS (1:1)
4.669 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
70
16 -77.1%
Tensor Cores
280
64 -77.1%
Power
TDP
300 W
60 W
TDP (W)
300
60 -80.0%
Suggested PSU
700 W
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
None
Architecture
Architecture
Blackwell 2.0
Ampere
GPU Name
GB203
GA107
Generation
GeForce 50
Ampere-MW (Ax000)
Process Size
5 nm
8 nm
Transistors
45,600 million
8,700 million
Die Size
378 mm²
200 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Samsung
Density
120.6M / mm²
43.5M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
12.0
8.6
Shader Model
6.9
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
Dual-slot
IGP
Length
304 mm 12 inches
Height
137 mm 5.4 inches
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1b3x DisplayPort 2.1b
Portable Device Dependent
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
PCIe 4.0 x8
Other
Launch Price
749 USD
Production
Active
End-of-life
Predecessor
GeForce 40
Quadro Turing-M
Successor
GeForce 60
Ada-MW
View GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Details View RTX A1000 Mobile Details