NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti vs NVIDIA P102-100 Comparison

The NVIDIA P102-100 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti represent two distinct eras of GPU design, one built for a specific mining workload and the other for modern gaming and compute. The data shows a substantial performance gulf between them, with the RTX 5070 Ti dominating in every directly comparable benchmark, while the P102-100’s architecture and specifications tell a story of a specialized product from a different generation. This analysis walks through the head-to-head results, architectural shifts, and practical implications based strictly on the provided benchmark and specification data.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The only two benchmarks shared between the two cards are Geekbench OpenCL and Geekbench Vulkan, and the RTX 5070 Ti wins both decisively. In Geekbench OpenCL, the RTX 5070 Ti scores 212,363 against the P102-100’s 49,602. The deltaPct of -76.6% for the P102-100 means the RTX 5070 Ti is roughly 328% faster in this test, a massive margin that highlights the generational leap in compute throughput. For Vulkan, the RTX 5070 Ti scores 225,122 versus 67,454 for the P102-100, with a deltaPct of -70%, translating to about 234% higher performance. These are not close contests; the RTX 5070 Ti more than triples the older card’s scores in both APIs.

Looking at the broader benchmark landscape, the P102-100’s average benchmark score is 58,528, while the RTX 5070 Ti’s is 49,957. This is a critical nuance: despite losing the head-to-head tests, the P102-100 actually has a higher average score across its full benchmark suite. The reason is that the RTX 5070 Ti’s average is dragged down by several Passmark tests that score very low in absolute terms—such as Passmark DirectX 9 at 351 and Passmark DirectX 10 at 192—which are not part of the P102-100’s benchmark set. The P102-100’s two Geekbench scores are both strong enough to place it at the 88th percentile of all GPUs, while the RTX 5070 Ti sits at the 86th percentile, despite its much higher raw scores in the shared tests. This illustrates that percentile rankings can be skewed by the selection of benchmarks included.

In the nearest rivals comparison, the P102-100 is bracketed by cards like the AMD Radeon PRO V710 (deltaPct -0.2%) and the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (deltaPct 0.2%), showing it performs in line with those higher-tier parts in its own test suite. The RTX 5070 Ti’s nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 (deltaPct -0.1%) and the Intel Arc A550M (deltaPct 0.4%), which are much older or lower-tier products, yet they score similarly on average. This suggests the RTX 5070 Ti’s benchmark profile is uneven, with exceptional performance in some tests and weaker results in others, likely due to driver or workload-specific factors.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 5070 Ti wins outright in every shared benchmark, so the use-case split is clear for any application that relies on OpenCL or Vulkan compute. Its 43.94 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 43.94 TFLOPS of FP16 (at a 1:1 ratio) make it far more capable for general-purpose compute, machine learning inference, and graphics workloads that leverage those APIs. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 225,122 indicates strong performance in modern rendering workloads, while the OpenCL score of 212,363 points to solid compute acceleration. For gaming, the RTX 5070 Ti’s DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) support and presence of 70 RT cores and 280 Tensor cores give it a clear edge in ray-traced titles and DLSS-enabled scenarios, though specific game benchmarks are not in the data.

The P102-100, conversely, has no wins in the head-to-head tests, but its higher average benchmark score and 88th percentile ranking suggest it excels in the specific tests it does run. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 49,602 and Vulkan score of 67,454 are respectable for a 2018 mining-oriented card, but they are dwarfed by the RTX 5070 Ti. The P102-100’s strengths lie in its niche: it was designed for mining, evidenced by its lack of display outputs and PCIe 1.0 x4 interface. In a mining context, its 10.77 TFLOPS of FP32 and 440.3 GB/s of memory bandwidth could have been sufficient, but the data does not include mining-specific benchmarks. For any modern compute or gaming task, the RTX 5070 Ti is the only viable choice based on the numbers.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gap between these two cards is vast. The P102-100 is built on the Pascal architecture using the GP102 chip, fabricated on a 16 nm process at TSMC. It contains 11,800 million transistors on a 471 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 25.1 million per mm². The RTX 5070 Ti, in contrast, uses the Blackwell 2.0 architecture with the GB203 chip, manufactured on a 5 nm process, also at TSMC. It packs 45,600 million transistors into a smaller 378 mm² die, achieving a density of 120.6 million per mm²—nearly five times the transistor density of the Pascal chip. This explains the RTX 5070 Ti’s superior performance despite a smaller physical die.

Memory configurations differ significantly. The P102-100 has 5 GB of GDDR5X on a 320-bit bus, delivering 440.3 GB/s of bandwidth. The RTX 5070 Ti offers 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus, with 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth—more than double the bandwidth. The RTX 5070 Ti also has far more compute resources: 8,960 shading units versus 3,200, 280 TMUs versus 200, and 96 ROPs versus 80. The RTX 5070 Ti adds 70 RT cores and 280 Tensor cores, which the P102-100 lacks entirely. Pixel rate jumps from 134.6 GPixel/s to 235.4 GPixel/s, and texture rate from 336.6 GTexel/s to 686.6 GTexel/s.

Clock speeds also tell the story. The P102-100 has a base clock of 1582 MHz and a boost of 1683 MHz, while the RTX 5070 Ti runs at 2295 MHz base and 2452 MHz boost. The FP16 performance is particularly telling: the P102-100 delivers 168.3 GFLOPS at a 1:64 ratio, meaning FP16 is severely handicapped, while the RTX 5070 Ti delivers full-rate FP16 at 43.94 TFLOPS (1:1). The P102-100 supports DirectX 12 (12_1), while the RTX 5070 Ti supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), and both support OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4. The P102-100 has no display outputs, while the RTX 5070 Ti includes 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b.

FAQ

Q: How much faster is the RTX 5070 Ti in Geekbench OpenCL compared to the P102-100?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti scores 212,363 in Geekbench OpenCL, while the P102-100 scores 49,602. The deltaPct of -76.6% indicates the RTX 5070 Ti is about 328% faster in this test.

Q: Does the P102-100 have any advantages over the RTX 5070 Ti in the benchmark data?

A: Yes, the P102-100 has a higher average benchmark score of 58,528 compared to the RTX 5070 Ti’s 49,957, and it sits at the 88th percentile of all GPUs versus the RTX 5070 Ti’s 86th percentile. However, this is due to different benchmark suites, as the RTX 5070 Ti wins all shared tests.

Q: What are the key architectural differences between the two cards?

A: The P102-100 uses the Pascal architecture on a 16 nm process with 11,800 million transistors and a 471 mm² die. The RTX 5070 Ti uses Blackwell 2.0 on a 5 nm process with 45,600 million transistors and a 378 mm² die, offering much higher transistor density and adding RT cores and Tensor cores.

Q: How do the memory bandwidths compare?

A: The P102-100 has 440.3 GB/s of bandwidth from 5 GB of GDDR5X on a 320-bit bus. The RTX 5070 Ti has 896.0 GB/s from 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus, more than double the bandwidth.

Q: Which card is more suitable for modern gaming?

A: Based on the data, the RTX 5070 Ti is clearly more suitable due to its DirectX 12 Ultimate support, 70 RT cores, 280 Tensor cores, and much higher compute performance. The P102-100 has no display outputs, making it unsuitable for gaming.

Q: What is the production status of each card?

A: The P102-100 is marked as End-of-life, with a release date of 2018-02-11. The RTX 5070 Ti is Active, with a release date of 2025-02-19, and its launch MSRP is 749 USD.

The Verdict

The benchmark data leaves no ambiguity: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is the superior card in every shared test, with Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores that are over three and two times higher, respectively. Its architectural advantages—5 nm process, 8,960 shading units, 16 GB of GDDR7, 70 RT cores, and 280 Tensor cores—translate into practical dominance for any compute, gaming, or content creation workload that uses the tested APIs. The P102-100, with its mining-specific design (no display outputs, PCIe 1.0 x4) and Pascal-era architecture, cannot compete in modern applications. The RTX 5070 Ti’s higher average benchmark score is misleading due to the inclusion of low-scoring Passmark tests, but the head-to-head results are unambiguous. Users should pick the RTX 5070 Ti for any general-purpose GPU task, while the P102-100 is only relevant in legacy mining or compute scenarios where its specific specifications suffice. The Verdict is straightforward: the RTX 5070 Ti is the only choice for current workloads.

Specification Differences

| Specification | NVIDIA P102-100 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | Pascal | Blackwell 2.0 |

| Process Node | 16 nm | 5 nm |

| Transistors | 11,800 million | 45,600 million |

| Die Size | 471 mm² | 378 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 25.1M / mm² | 120.6M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 1582 MHz | 2295 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 1683 MHz | 2452 MHz |

| Memory Size | 5 GB | 16 GB |

| Memory Type | GDDR5X | GDDR7 |

| Memory Bus Width | 320 bit | 256 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 440.3 GB/s | 896.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 3200 | 8960 |

| TMUs | 200 | 280 |

| ROPs | 80 | 96 |

| RT Cores | None | 70 |

| Tensor Cores | None | 280 |

| Pixel Rate | 134.6 GPixel/s | 235.4 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 336.6 GTexel/s | 686.6 GTexel/s |

| FP32 Performance | 10.77 TFLOPS | 43.94 TFLOPS |

| FP16 Performance | 168.3 GFLOPS (1:64) | 43.94 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 250 W | 300 W |

| Power Connectors | 2x 8-pin | 1x 16-pin |

| Suggested PSU | 600 W | 700 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 1.0 x4 | PCIe 5.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | No outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b |

| DirectX Support | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |

| Dimensions (Length) | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 304 mm (12 inches) |

| Production Status | End-of-life | Active |

| Release Date | 2018-02-11 | 2025-02-19 |