NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER vs NVIDIA T600 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data presents a unique comparison challenge. The NVIDIA T600 has a broad set of benchmark results across nine different tests, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has only a single recorded benchmark result, a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6269.5. Direct head-to-head comparisons are therefore limited to interpreting what the T600 would likely score in that specific test, which the database does not provide. Instead, the analysis must rely on the aggregate scores and the relative standing of each card.

The T600's average benchmark score across all its tested workloads is 7035. This places it in the 39th percentile of all GPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals in terms of average score are the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970, which scores 7157 (1.7% higher), and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M, which scores 7023 (0.2% lower). This cluster of scores indicates that the T600 is positioned in a performance tier where small percentage differences separate it from its contemporaries. The T600 leads the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M by 1.3% and the AMD Radeon R5 M240 by 0.9%, showing that it is competitive within its immediate peer group.

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has an average benchmark score of 6270, which places it in the 36th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102, which has an identical average score of 6270, resulting in a 0% delta. The database also lists the NVIDIA Quadro K620 as a rival, scoring 6282, which is 0.2% higher than the 5070 Ti SUPER. The AMD FirePro W600 scores 6223, putting it 0.8% behind, and the AMD Radeon R7 M350 scores 6327, which is 0.9% ahead.

The raw score comparison shows the T600 has a higher average benchmark score of 7035 compared to the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's 6270. This is a 12.2% advantage for the T600 in aggregate terms. However, the two cards are tested on entirely different workloads. The T600's score is derived from a mix of legacy DirectX tests, compute workloads, and OpenCL/Vulkan benchmarks. The 5070 Ti SUPER's score comes solely from a modern DX12 test. The data does not provide a common workload, so a direct percentage-based head-to-head victory cannot be established. The wins count in the database is zero for both cards, reflecting the lack of overlapping test data.

Where Each One Wins

The T600 demonstrates its strengths across a wide range of older and general-purpose workloads. Its PassMark G3D score of 6479 shows solid performance in standard 3D graphics tasks. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 27875 and Vulkan score of 25580 indicate strong compute and cross-platform graphics capabilities. The card is also proficient in legacy DirectX environments, with a PassMark DirectX 9 score of 114, a DirectX 10 score of 32, and a DirectX 11 score of 49. Its PassMark GPU compute score of 2402 rounds out a profile suited for professional workstation applications that rely on OpenGL and compute APIs.

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER, with its single 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6269.5, showcases its capability in the most demanding modern gaming workloads. This test is a current-generation DX12 benchmark, which stresses features like ray tracing and mesh shaders. A score of 6269.5 in this specific test places it in direct competition with the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102, which achieves the same score. This indicates that in the latest DX12 titles, the 5070 Ti SUPER delivers performance that matches a high-end card from the previous generation.

The use-case split is clear. The T600 wins in scenarios involving legacy software, professional OpenGL applications, and general compute tasks where its diverse benchmark results show consistent, if modest, performance. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER wins in modern DX12 gaming, where it is the only card with recorded data, and its score reflects a performance level that the T600's older architecture is not designed to match. The T600 has more wins across its benchmark suite, but the 5070 Ti SUPER's win is in the most relevant test for contemporary gaming.

Architecture Differences

The two cards represent opposite ends of NVIDIA's architectural timeline. The T600 is built on the Turing architecture, using the TU117 chip manufactured on a 12 nm process at TSMC. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses the Blackwell 2.0 architecture with the GB203 chip, built on a 5 nm process, also at TSMC. The process node difference is significant, with the 5 nm node allowing for a much higher transistor density of 120.6M per mm² compared to the T600's 23.5M per mm².

The transistor count tells a story of scale. The T600 has 4,700 million transistors on a 200 mm² die. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER packs 45,600 million transistors onto a 378 mm² die. This is a nearly tenfold increase in transistor count, enabling a massive increase in compute resources. The T600 has 640 shading units, 40 texture mapping units, and 32 raster output units. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 8,960 shading units, 280 TMUs, and 96 ROPs.

The Blackwell 2.0 architecture also introduces dedicated hardware that the Turing-based T600 lacks. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER includes 70 ray tracing cores and 280 tensor cores. The T600 has no RT cores and no tensor cores listed in the data. This means the 5070 Ti SUPER has dedicated hardware for real-time ray tracing and AI-accelerated workloads, while the T600 must rely on its general-purpose shaders for all tasks.

Memory architecture differs substantially as well. The T600 uses 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 160.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock also differs, with the T600 running at 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) and the 5070 Ti SUPER at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective). The API support reflects the generational gap. The T600 supports DirectX 12 (12_1) while the 5070 Ti SUPER supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2). Both support OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4, but the 12_2 feature level on the newer card enables advanced DX12 features.

FAQ

Q: How does the T600 compare to its closest rivals in average score?

A: The T600's average benchmark score is 7035. It is 0.2% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M (7023), 0.9% ahead of the AMD Radeon R5 M240 (6975), and 1.3% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M (6946). It trails the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 (7157) by 1.7%.

Q: What is the single recorded benchmark for the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER?

A: The only recorded benchmark for the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, where it scores 6269.5. This is its only data point in the database.

Q: Which card has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The T600 has a higher average benchmark score of 7035 compared to the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's 6270. However, these averages are based on different sets of tests, so they are not directly comparable.

Q: Does the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER have ray tracing cores?

A: Yes, the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 70 ray tracing cores. The T600 has no ray tracing cores listed in its specifications.

Q: What is the memory capacity difference between the two cards?

A: The T600 has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 16 GB of GDDR7 memory. The 5070 Ti SUPER also has a wider 256-bit memory bus compared to the T600's 128-bit bus.

Q: How does the T600 perform in DirectX 9 compared to DirectX 12?

A: The T600 scores 114 in the PassMark DirectX 9 test and 25 in the PassMark DirectX 12 test. This suggests its performance is much stronger in legacy DirectX workloads than in modern DX12 tasks.

The Verdict

The data presents a clear split based on workload requirements. For users running legacy professional applications, OpenGL-based design software, or general compute tasks, the T600 is the appropriate choice. Its suite of benchmark scores shows it is competitive with other cards in its performance tier, sitting within 1.7% of its nearest rivals. Its 4 GB of memory and 160.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for these types of workloads, and its 40 W TDP makes it an efficient, single-slot solution that requires no power connectors.

For users focused on modern DX12 gaming, the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is the only card with recorded data in this area. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 6269.5 matches the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102, indicating it delivers current-generation gaming performance. The inclusion of 70 ray tracing cores and 280 tensor cores makes it suitable for ray-traced games and AI-enhanced features. Its 16 GB of GDDR7 memory and 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth provide ample resources for high-resolution textures and demanding game engines.

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER also has a significant architectural advantage. The 5 nm process node and Blackwell 2.0 architecture provide a transistor density of 120.6M per mm², enabling 43.94 TFLOPS of FP32 performance compared to the T600's 1.709 TFLOPS. The newer card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, while the T600 is limited to DirectX 12 (12_1). Users who need the latest features and maximum performance in modern games should choose the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER. Users with older software stacks and modest performance needs will find the T600 adequate, but the data clearly shows the 5070 Ti SUPER is the more capable card for contemporary workloads.

Specification Differences

| Specification | NVIDIA T600 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | Turing | Blackwell 2.0 |

| Process Node | 12 nm | 5 nm |

| Transistors | 4,700 million | 45,600 million |

| Die Size | 200 mm² | 378 mm² |

| Base Clock | 735 MHz | 2295 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 1335 MHz | 2452 MHz |

| Memory Size | 4 GB | 16 GB |

| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR7 |

| Memory Bus Width | 128 bit | 256 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 896.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 640 | 8960 |

| TMUs | 40 | 280 |

| ROPs | 32 | 96 |

| RT Cores | None | 70 |

| Tensor Cores | None | 280 |

| Pixel Rate | 42.72 GPixel/s | 235.4 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 53.40 GTexel/s | 686.6 GTexel/s |

| FP32 Performance | 1.709 TFLOPS | 43.94 TFLOPS |

| TDP | 40 W | 350 W |

| Slot Width | Single-slot | Dual-slot |

| Power Connectors | None | 1x 16-pin |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 5.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b |

| DirectX Support | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |

| Production Status | End-of-life | Active |