NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The recorded benchmark data provides only one scored test for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER: the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, where it posts 6269.5 points. The NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, which means there is no direct head-to-head comparison available. Consequently, the win split is effectively zero for both sides in direct competition.

However, the absence of a score for the mobile part does not erase its profile. The RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation sits in the 50th percentile among all GPUs in the database, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER sits in the 36th percentile. This percentile difference indicates that the mobile workstation part, despite having no measured score, is placed higher in the overall distribution based on aggregate database data. The desktop card's single benchmark result places it near several rivals with similar average scores: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 matches its 6270 average exactly (0% delta), the AMD FirePro W600 is 0.8% ahead, the NVIDIA Quadro K620 is 0.2% behind, and the AMD Radeon R7 M350 is 0.9% behind.

Where each one wins is therefore a matter of context. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER wins on raw measured performance in the one benchmark available, delivering a substantial score that places it in a performance tier alongside the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102. The RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation wins on efficiency and form factor, as its 50 W TDP and IGP slot width make it a low-power embedded solution, while the desktop card demands 350 W and a dual-slot chassis. The data shows a clear split: desktop performance versus mobile integration.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different architectural generations and target entirely different market segments. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses the GB203 chip built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, fabricated by TSMC on a 5 nm process. It integrates 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 120.6 million per square millimeter. In contrast, the NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation uses the AD107 chip on the Ada Lovelace architecture, also fabricated by TSMC on 5 nm, but with 18,900 million transistors on a 159 mm² die, for a density of 118.9 million per square millimeter.

The desktop part has 8960 shading units, 280 texture mapping units, and 96 ROPs. It carries 70 RT cores and 280 tensor cores. The mobile part has 3072 shading units, 96 TMUs, and 48 ROPs, with 24 RT cores and 96 tensor cores. The ratio of RT cores to shading units is similar (about 0.78% for the desktop versus 0.78% for the mobile), but the absolute counts are vastly different, reflecting the desktop card's larger silicon budget.

Memory architecture differs significantly. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 256.0 GB/s. The desktop card's memory bandwidth is 3.5 times higher, which is critical for high-resolution rendering and large dataset workloads.

Clock speeds also diverge. The desktop GPU runs at a base clock of 2295 MHz and a boost clock of 2452 MHz, with memory at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective). The mobile GPU has a base of 1635 MHz and a boost of 2115 MHz, with memory at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). The desktop part boosts 15.9% higher and operates its memory at 75% higher effective speed.

Feature sets are similar on paper: both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The desktop card offers 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b outputs, while the mobile part is portable device dependent for display outputs. The desktop card uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, while the mobile part uses PCIe 4.0 x16. Power delivery differs completely: the desktop card uses a 1x 16-pin connector and draws 350 W TDP, while the mobile part has no power connectors and draws only 50 W TDP. The desktop card measures 304 mm in length, 137 mm in height, and 48 mm in width, while the mobile part has no recorded dimensions due to its IGP form factor.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries between these two GPUs. The only scored benchmark belongs to the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER: 6269.5 points in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. The RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation has an empty benchmarks array and an average benchmark score of 0. This makes numerical comparison impossible for any workload.

What the data does provide is the desktop card's relationship to other GPUs in the database. Its average score of 6270 places it exactly level with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102, which also averages 6270. That parity is notable because the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 is a different chip variant of the same product family. The desktop card is 0.2% behind the NVIDIA Quadro K620 (6282), 0.8% ahead of the AMD FirePro W600 (6223), and 0.9% ahead of the AMD Radeon R7 M350 (6327). These deltas are all within 1%, indicating that the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's measured score places it in a tightly clustered group of GPUs with nearly identical average performance in the database.

Given the lack of a comparable score for the mobile part, the only meaningful benchmark analysis is the desktop card's standalone result. Its 6269.5 Steel Nomad score represents a modern DX12 workload at high resolution, and the 36th percentile ranking among all GPUs suggests that, while not at the top of the database, it sits comfortably above the majority of entries. The mobile part's 50th percentile ranking, despite having no measured score, suggests that the database's aggregate metadata places it in the median range, but without a score, no performance claim can be substantiated.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear division of purpose. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is a high-performance desktop GPU with a measured 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 6269.5, a 350 W TDP, and a dual-slot cooling footprint. It delivers 43.94 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, 896.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth, and 16 GB of GDDR7 memory. It is designed for demanding desktop workloads where power and space are available.

The NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation is a low-power mobile workstation GPU with a 50 W TDP, an IGP form factor, and no power connectors. It delivers 12.99 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, 256.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth, and 8 GB of GDDR6 memory. It is designed for portable devices where efficiency and compactness take priority over absolute performance.

For users who need maximum raw rendering performance in a desktop chassis, the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is the only option with a recorded benchmark score, and that score is substantial. For users who need GPU acceleration in a mobile or embedded system with minimal power draw, the RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation is the only option that fits that form factor. The two GPUs are not direct competitors; they serve different physical and thermal envelopes. The benchmark data confirms the desktop card's performance tier, while the mobile part's lack of scores leaves its performance unquantified in the database.

FAQ

Q: Does the database show any direct benchmark comparison between these two GPUs?

A: No. The head-to-head benchmarks array is empty, and the RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation has no recorded benchmark scores, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has one score of 6269.5 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12.

Q: What is the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's performance relative to its nearest rivals?

A: Its average score of 6270 exactly matches the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 (0% delta). It is 0.2% behind the NVIDIA Quadro K620 (6282), 0.8% ahead of the AMD FirePro W600 (6223), and 0.9% ahead of the AMD Radeon R7 M350 (6327).

Q: Which GPU has more memory and bandwidth?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus with 896.0 GB/s bandwidth. The RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What are the power requirements for each GPU?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a 350 W TDP and uses a 1x 16-pin power connector. The RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation has a 50 W TDP and has no power connectors.

Q: What architecture does each GPU use?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses the GB203 chip on Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation uses the AD107 chip on Ada Lovelace architecture. Both are fabricated by TSMC on a 5 nm process.

Q: Which GPU has a higher percentile ranking in the database?

A: The RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation is in the 50th percentile among all GPUs, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is in the 36th percentile. This ranking reflects aggregate database metadata, not measured scores for the mobile part.