NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a significant performance gap between these two NVIDIA parts, though direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons are limited. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER carries a single recorded benchmark score: 6269.5 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, with an average benchmark score of 6270. The NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, which limits direct numerical comparison.

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER sits at the 36th percentile among all GPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 with an identical average score of 6270 and a delta of 0%, indicating performance parity. The AMD FirePro W600 posts an average score of 6223, placing it 0.8% behind the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER. The NVIDIA Quadro K620 scores 6282, which is 0.2% ahead. The AMD Radeon R7 M350 scores 6327, 0.9% ahead of the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER.

The RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation holds a 50th percentile rank among all GPUs despite having no recorded benchmarks. This percentile placement comes from its hardware configuration rather than measured performance data. The database shows no nearest rivals for this embedded part, reflecting its specialized position in the product stack.

In terms of raw compute throughput, the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER delivers 43.94 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, while the RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation delivers 12.35 TFLOPS. This represents a 3.56x advantage for the desktop card. The texture rate shows a similar pattern: 686.6 GTexel/s versus 193.0 GTexel/s, a 3.56x difference. Pixel rate stands at 235.4 GPixel/s for the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER versus 96.48 GPixel/s for the embedded part, a 2.44x gap.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different NVIDIA architectural generations. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses the Blackwell 2.0 architecture built on the GB203 chip, while the RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace architecture on the AD107 chip. Both are manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC, but the similarities end there.

The transistor counts differ dramatically. The GB203 chip packs 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 120.6M per mm². The AD107 chip contains 18,900 million transistors on a 159 mm² die, with a density of 118.9M per mm². The desktop chip is 2.4x larger in die area and holds 2.4x more transistors.

Core configurations show the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER with 8960 shading units, 280 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation has 3072 shading units, 96 TMUs, and 48 ROPs. The ray tracing cores number 70 versus 24, and tensor cores number 280 versus 96. These ratios align closely with the FP32 throughput difference.

Memory subsystems diverge substantially. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus, producing 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 256.0 GB/s. The desktop card has 3.5x the memory bandwidth. Clock speeds also differ: the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER runs at 2295 MHz base and 2452 MHz boost, while the embedded part runs at 1530 MHz base and 2010 MHz boost. Memory clocks are 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective) versus 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective).

Power and physical characteristics show the intended use cases. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER draws 350 W, occupies a dual-slot form factor, and requires a single 16-pin power connector. The RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation draws 50 W, uses an IGP form factor, and requires no power connectors. The desktop card measures 304 mm in length, 137 mm in height, and 48 mm in width. The embedded part has no recorded dimensions. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses PCIe 5.0 x16, while the embedded part uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER wins decisively in every measured compute category. Its FP32 throughput of 43.94 TFLOPS positions it for demanding desktop workloads, and its 896.0 GB/s memory bandwidth supports data-intensive applications. The 16 GB GDDR7 frame buffer doubles the capacity of the embedded part and offers a newer memory type. The 70 ray tracing cores and 280 tensor cores provide substantial acceleration for ray-traced rendering and AI inference tasks.

The RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation wins in power efficiency and physical integration. At 50 W, it consumes one-seventh the power of the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER. The IGP form factor with no power connectors and no recorded dimensions indicates a compact design suited for embedded systems. The PCIe 4.0 x16 interface provides adequate bandwidth for its 256.0 GB/s memory subsystem. The 24 ray tracing cores and 96 tensor cores still enable ray tracing and AI features, just at a smaller scale.

The desktop part targets scenarios where performance takes priority. The embedded part targets scenarios where power envelopes, thermal constraints, and space limitations dominate. The 50th percentile ranking of the embedded part versus the 36th percentile of the desktop part suggests the database places the embedded GPU higher relative to all GPUs, though this ranking derives from configuration rather than measured benchmarks.

The Verdict

The data indicates a clear performance hierarchy. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER delivers 3.56x the FP32 compute, 3.56x the texture rate, and 2.44x the pixel rate of the RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation. Its 896.0 GB/s bandwidth is 3.5x higher, and its 16 GB memory capacity is double. These figures make the desktop card the choice for workloads that demand maximum throughput.

The RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation serves a different purpose. Its 50 W power draw, IGP form factor, and connector-free design make it suitable for portable or embedded systems where the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's 350 W requirement and dual-slot footprint would be impractical. The Ada Lovelace architecture still provides modern features including DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 support, identical to the Blackwell 2.0 part.

The release dates confirm the generational separation. The RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation launched in March 2023, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER launched in December 2025. The embedded part lists Ampere-MW as its predecessor and Blackwell-MW as its successor, placing it in a distinct product lineage from the desktop GeForce card.

FAQ

Q: How much faster is the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER in FP32 compute compared to the RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER delivers 43.94 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, while the RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation delivers 12.35 TFLOPS, making the desktop card 3.56x faster.

Q: What are the memory differences between these two GPUs?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus with 896.0 GB/s bandwidth. The RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Which GPU has more ray tracing cores?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 70 ray tracing cores, compared to 24 ray tracing cores in the RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation.

Q: What is the power consumption difference?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a TDP of 350 W and requires a 1x 16-pin power connector. The RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation has a TDP of 50 W and requires no power connectors.

Q: What are the form factor differences?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is a dual-slot card measuring 304 mm in length, 137 mm in height, and 48 mm in width. The RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation uses an IGP form factor with no recorded dimensions.

Q: What benchmark data exists for each GPU?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a recorded 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6269.5 and an average benchmark score of 6270. The RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation has no recorded benchmark scores in the database.

Specification Differences

| Specification | RTX 5070 Ti SUPER | RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Ada Lovelace |

| Chip | GB203 | AD107 |

| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |

| Transistors | 45,600 million | 18,900 million |

| Die Size | 378 mm² | 159 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 120.6M / mm² | 118.9M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 2295 MHz | 1530 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2452 MHz | 2010 MHz |

| Memory Clock | 1750 MHz 28 Gbps effective | 2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective |

| Memory Size | 16 GB | 8 GB |

| Memory Type | GDDR7 | GDDR6 |

| Memory Bus Width | 256 bit | 128 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 896.0 GB/s | 256.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 8960 | 3072 |

| TMUs | 280 | 96 |

| ROPs | 96 | 48 |

| RT Cores | 70 | 24 |

| Tensor Cores | 280 | 96 |

| Pixel Rate | 235.4 GPixel/s | 96.48 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 686.6 GTexel/s | 193.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 43.94 TFLOPS | 12.35 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 43.94 TFLOPS (1:1) | 12.35 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 350 W | 50 W |

| Slot Width | Dual-slot | IGP |

| Power Connectors | 1x 16-pin | None |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 5.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1b 3x DisplayPort 2.1b | Portable Device Dependent |

| Release Date | 2025-12-31 | 2023-03-20 |

| Production Status | Active | Active |