NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER vs NVIDIA Quadro K620M Comparison

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER and the NVIDIA Quadro K620M represent two extremes of the GPU spectrum, separated by over a decade of architectural evolution. The data shows a stark contrast: the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER achieves a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6269.5, while the Quadro K620M posts a Geekbench OpenCL score of 5957. While these tests are not directly comparable, the underlying specifications and performance percentiles paint a clear picture of two devices built for entirely different purposes. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER sits in the 36th percentile of all GPUs, whereas the Quadro K620M falls into the 34th percentile, but this proximity in ranking masks a chasm in raw capability and feature support.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

Direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons are not available in the dataset, as the two cards were tested under different workloads — the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER with 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 and the Quadro K620M with Geekbench OpenCL. However, the nearest rival data provides useful context for interpreting each score individually.

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 6269.5 places it in a tight cluster of competitors. It is exactly matched by the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102, which scores 6270, a delta of 0%. It edges out the AMD FirePro W600 by a margin of 0.8%, with the latter scoring 6223. Conversely, it trails the NVIDIA Quadro K620 by 0.2% (6282) and the AMD Radeon R7 M350 by 0.9% (6327). These deltas are remarkably small, indicating that the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is precisely positioned within a competitive performance band for this specific workload, despite its modern architecture.

The Quadro K620M’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 5957 shows a similar pattern of close competition within its own tier. It is essentially tied with the AMD Radeon HD 8730M, which scores 5955 (0% delta). It lags the AMD Radeon HD 8750M (5970) by 0.2% and the NVIDIA Quadro K4000 (5982) by 0.4%. Its only win among the listed rivals is against the Intel UHD Graphics 730, which it beats by 0.5% (5929). This indicates that the K620M, despite its age, holds its own against a specific set of low-power and older mobile GPUs, but its performance ceiling is fundamentally low.

When extrapolating from the architectural data, the gap becomes obvious. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER’s FP32 compute is listed at 43.94 TFLOPS, while the Quadro K620M manages 863.2 GFLOPS — a difference of roughly 50 times. Similarly, the pixel rate of the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is 235.4 GPixel/s versus 8.992 GPixel/s for the K620M. These are not comparable benchmark scores, but they explain why the two GPUs would never be placed in the same benchmark suite; the K620M would be overwhelmed by the demands of a modern DX12 test like Steel Nomad.

Architecture Differences

The architectural divide between these two GPUs is generational. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture using the GB203 chip, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It integrates 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 120.6M per mm². In contrast, the Quadro K620M is based on the much older Maxwell architecture, using the GM108S chip on a 28 nm process, also at TSMC. It contains just 1,020 million transistors on a 77 mm² die, with a density of 13.2M per mm².

The memory subsystems are equally divergent. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER features 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Quadro K620M has 2 GB of DDR3 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing a mere 16.02 GB/s. This represents a 56-fold difference in memory bandwidth, which is critical for modern texture-heavy workloads and high-resolution rendering.

Core counts tell the same story. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 8960 shading units, 280 texture mapping units (TMUs), and 96 raster output units (ROPs). It also includes 70 ray tracing cores and 280 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI-driven features like DLSS. The Quadro K620M has 384 shading units, 16 TMUs, and 8 ROPs, with no ray tracing or tensor cores at all. The absence of these specialized units means the K620M cannot accelerate the modern rendering techniques that the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER handles natively.

Other differences include the process node, power delivery, and connectivity. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER runs at a base clock of 2295 MHz and a boost clock of 2452 MHz, with a memory clock of 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective). The Quadro K620M operates at a base clock of 1029 MHz and a boost of 1124 MHz, with a memory clock of 1001 MHz (2 Gbps effective). The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, while the K620M uses an MXM-A (3.0) form factor. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is a dual-slot card requiring a 16-pin power connector, whereas the K620M is an MXM module with no external power connectors.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is the clear winner in any scenario that demands modern graphics processing. Its 16 GB GDDR7 memory and 896.0 GB/s bandwidth make it suitable for 4K gaming, high-fidelity ray tracing, and content creation workloads such as video editing and 3D rendering. The presence of 70 RT cores and 280 tensor cores allows it to excel in applications that leverage hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI upscaling, providing a significant advantage in both gaming and professional visualization tasks. Its 43.94 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 686.6 GTexel/s texture rate indicate it can handle complex shader workloads and high-resolution texture filtering without bottlenecking.

The Quadro K620M, by contrast, wins in the domain of legacy compatibility and low-power mobile deployment. As an MXM module with a 30 W TDP, it is designed for portable workstations where power efficiency is paramount. Its 2 GB of DDR3 memory and 16.02 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for basic 2D CAD, spreadsheet acceleration, and light video playback. The K620M’s support for DirectX 12 (11_0) and Vulkan 1.4 means it can run older or less demanding applications, but it will struggle with any modern AAA game or GPU-accelerated compute task. Its end-of-life production status and release date from early 2015 further indicate that its primary market has shifted to legacy system maintenance rather than new deployments.

In terms of benchmark percentiles, the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER’s 36th percentile suggests it is above average but not at the top of the current GPU hierarchy. The Quadro K620M’s 34th percentile is remarkably close, but this is likely a reflection of the benchmark pool containing many older and low-power GPUs. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER’s active production status and launch MSRP of 749 USD position it as a current-generation high-end product, while the K620M is explicitly listed as end-of-life.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has more memory bandwidth?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a bandwidth of 896.0 GB/s, while the NVIDIA Quadro K620M has 16.02 GB/s. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER’s bandwidth is roughly 56 times higher.

Q: Does the Quadro K620M support ray tracing?

A: No. The Quadro K620M has no ray tracing cores or tensor cores. Only the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER includes 70 RT cores and 280 tensor cores for hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI workloads.

Q: What is the process node difference between the two?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is fabricated on a 5 nm process, while the Quadro K620M uses a 28 nm process. Both are manufactured by TSMC.

Q: Are these GPUs comparable in power consumption?

A: No. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a TDP of 350 W and requires a dual-slot cooler with a 16-pin power connector. The Quadro K620M has a TDP of 30 W and is an MXM module with no external power connectors.

Q: Which GPU has a higher clock speed?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a base clock of 2295 MHz and a boost clock of 2452 MHz. The Quadro K620M has a base clock of 1029 MHz and a boost clock of 1124 MHz.

Q: What is the production status of each GPU?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is listed as “Active” in production, while the Quadro K620M is listed as “End-of-life.” The K620M’s predecessor is the Quadro Fermi-M, and its successor is the Quadro Maxwell-M.

Specification Differences

The following table outlines the key differences between the two GPUs, focusing only on fields where they do not match:

| Specification | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER | NVIDIA Quadro K620M |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Maxwell |

| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |

| Transistors | 45,600 million | 1,020 million |

| Die Size | 378 mm² | 77 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 120.6M / mm² | 13.2M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 2295 MHz | 1029 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2452 MHz | 1124 MHz |

| Memory Clock | 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective) | 1001 MHz (2 Gbps effective) |

| Memory Size | 16 GB | 2 GB |

| Memory Type | GDDR7 | DDR3 |

| Memory Bus Width | 256 bit | 64 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 896.0 GB/s | 16.02 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 8960 | 384 |

| TMUs | 280 | 16 |

| ROPs | 96 | 8 |

| RT Cores | 70 | None |

| Tensor Cores | 280 | None |

| Pixel Rate | 235.4 GPixel/s | 8.992 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 686.6 GTexel/s | 17.98 GTexel/s |

| FP32 Compute | 43.94 TFLOPS | 863.2 GFLOPS |

| TDP | 350 W | 30 W |

| Slot Width | Dual-slot | MXM Module |

| Power Connectors | 1x 16-pin | None |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 5.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |

| Display Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b | Portable Device Dependent |

| DirectX Support | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (11_0) |

| Production Status | Active | End-of-life |

| Release Date | 2025-12-31 | 2015-02-28 |

| Launch MSRP | 749 USD | None |