NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile vs NVIDIA TITAN RTX Comparison

The Verdict

The recorded data splits these two NVIDIA parts cleanly by era and workload. The GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile wins 8 of 9 head-to-head benchmarks, with its largest margins in DirectX 11 (25.4% ahead), DirectX 9 (16.1%), and DirectX 12 (15.9%). The TITAN RTX takes only Geekbench OpenCL, edging ahead by 0.7%, a negligible gap given its much higher power draw. For anyone building or buying a system today, the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is the practical choice: it delivers higher average benchmark scores (35435 vs 31676, about 11.9% higher), sits at the 80th percentile of all GPUs versus the TITAN's 76th, and does so inside a 60 W envelope. The TITAN RTX remains relevant only for legacy workloads that specifically favor its older compute layout or for those who need 24 GB of VRAM in a desktop card, but the data shows it is decisively behind in modern API tests.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different foundry nodes and design philosophies. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile uses the GB205 chip on TSMC's 5 nm process, packing 31,100 million transistors into a 263 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 118.3 million per mm². The TITAN RTX uses the TU102 chip on TSMC's 12 nm process, with 18,600 million transistors spread across a much larger 754 mm² die, giving a density of only 24.7 million per mm². The architectural generation gap is stark: Blackwell 2.0 versus Turing.

Core counts tell a mixed story. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has more shading units (5888 vs 4608) and more ROPs (80 vs 96 actually favors the TITAN), but the TITAN RTX counters with more TMUs (288 vs 184), more RT cores (72 vs 46), and far more tensor cores (576 vs 184). The TITAN's fp16 throughput is 32.62 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio, double its fp32 rate, while the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile runs fp16 at 17.04 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio, matching its fp32 output. Memory also diverges: both offer 672.0 GB/s bandwidth, but the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile uses 12 GB of GDDR7 on a 192-bit bus, while the TITAN RTX uses 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 384-bit bus. The TITAN's memory clock is 1750 MHz at 14 Gbps effective, while the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile runs 1750 MHz at 28 Gbps effective, which explains how a narrower bus achieves the same bandwidth.

Power and physical design could not differ more. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is rated at 60 W TDP, is an integrated graphics package (IGP), requires no power connectors, and has display outputs that are portable-device dependent. The TITAN RTX draws 280 W, is a dual-slot card with 2x 8-pin power connectors, requires a 600 W suggested PSU, and offers 1x HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a, and 1x USB Type-C. The TITAN measures 267 mm in length, 116 mm in height, and 35 mm in width. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has no listed dimensions because it is not a discrete card in the traditional sense.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The biggest win for the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile comes in Passmark DirectX 11, where it scores 237 against the TITAN's 189, a 25.4% advantage. That is a substantial lead in one of the most common gaming API paths. DirectX 12 shows a 15.9% gap (102 vs 88), and DirectX 9 shows 16.1% (259 vs 223). The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test appears only for the TITAN RTX, with a score of 3794, but there is no comparable result for the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile in the recorded data, so a direct comparison is not possible.

In Passmark G3D, the overall gaming estimate, the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile posts 24004 versus 20491, a 17.1% lead. Passmark G2D also favors the newer part, 981 vs 860, a 14.1% gap. Compute workloads are closer: Passmark GPU compute shows 10101 vs 10034, a 0.7% win for the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile, while Geekbench OpenCL actually goes to the TITAN RTX, 144858 vs 143870, a 0.7% margin. Geekbench Vulkan reverses that, with the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile at 139213 against 136073, a 2.3% win. DirectX 10 results are nearly tied at 151 vs 147, a 2.7% edge for the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile.

The pattern is clear: the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile wins every modern API test by margins ranging from 0.7% to 25.4%, while the TITAN RTX only takes one legacy compute test by a hair. The average benchmark score cements this, 35435 vs 31676, an 11.9% overall advantage for the mobile part.

Specification Differences

The table below lists only the fields where the two GPUs differ in the database records:

| Specification | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile | TITAN RTX |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Turing |

| Process Node | 5 nm | 12 nm |

| Transistors | 31,100 million | 18,600 million |

| Die Size | 263 mm² | 754 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 118.3M / mm² | 24.7M / mm² |

| Boost Clock | 1447 MHz | 1770 MHz |

| Base Clock | 847 MHz | 1350 MHz |

| Memory Effective Speed | 28 Gbps | 14 Gbps |

| Memory Size | 12 GB | 24 GB |

| Memory Type | GDDR7 | GDDR6 |

| Memory Bus Width | 192 bit | 384 bit |

| Shading Units | 5888 | 4608 |

| TMUs | 184 | 288 |

| ROPs | 80 | 96 |

| RT Cores | 46 | 72 |

| Tensor Cores | 184 | 576 |

| Pixel Rate | 115.8 GPixel/s | 169.9 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 266.2 GTexel/s | 509.8 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 17.04 TFLOPS | 16.31 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 17.04 TFLOPS (1:1) | 32.62 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 60 W | 280 W |

| Slot Width | IGP | Dual-slot |

| Power Connectors | None | 2x 8-pin |

| Suggested PSU | N/A | 600 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 5.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-C |

| Dimensions | N/A | 267 mm x 116 mm x 35 mm |

| Production Status | Active | End-of-life |

| Release Date | 2025-02-28 | 2018-12-17 |

| Predecessor | GeForce 40 Mobile | GeForce 10 |

| Successor | N/A | GeForce 30 |

| Launch MSRP | N/A | 2,499 USD |

The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has a higher fp32 throughput (17.04 vs 16.31 TFLOPS) despite lower clocks, which is a direct result of its much higher shading unit count and efficient 5 nm process. The TITAN RTX counters with higher pixel and texture rates (169.9 GPixel/s and 509.8 GTexel/s versus 115.8 and 266.2) thanks to its higher boost clock and larger TMU/ROP counts. The TITAN also has more RT and tensor cores, but those older Turing cores do not translate to wins in the recorded benchmarks.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile scores 35435 on average, while the TITAN RTX scores 31676. The mobile part is about 11.9% higher overall.

Q: Why does the TITAN RTX have more memory but the same bandwidth?

A: The TITAN RTX has 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 384-bit bus at 14 Gbps effective, while the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has 12 GB of GDDR7 on a 192-bit bus at 28 Gbps effective. Both achieve exactly 672.0 GB/s, but the newer GDDR7 runs at double the effective speed, compensating for the narrower bus.

Q: In which benchmark does the TITAN RTX beat the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile?

A: The TITAN RTX wins only Geekbench OpenCL, scoring 144858 versus 143870, a 0.7% margin. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile wins every other head-to-head test.

Q: What is the largest single benchmark win for the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile?

A: Passmark DirectX 11, where it scores 237 versus the TITAN's 189, a 25.4% advantage. That is the biggest delta in the head-to-head data.

Q: How do their power requirements compare?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is rated at 60 W TDP, has no power connectors, and is an integrated graphics package. The TITAN RTX is rated at 280 W, requires 2x 8-pin connectors, and needs a 600 W suggested PSU.

Q: Are both GPUs still in production?

A: No. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is listed as Active, while the TITAN RTX is End-of-life. The TITAN RTX was released on 2018-12-17, and the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile on 2025-02-28.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile wins in every practical gaming and modern API scenario. Its 25.4% lead in DirectX 11 is the standout, but the 15.9% and 16.1% margins in DirectX 12 and DirectX 9 respectively show consistent strength across API generations. Passmark G3D, the aggregate gaming score, favors it by 17.1%. For anyone playing current titles or running DirectX-based applications, the data points squarely to the mobile Blackwell part. Its 60 W TDP also makes it suitable for thin-and-light systems, whereas the TITAN RTX requires a full desktop chassis with a 600 W PSU and dual-slot cooling.

The TITAN RTX retains one narrow advantage: Geekbench OpenCL, where it wins by 0.7%. That is a marginal result, but it suggests the older Turing architecture with its 576 tensor cores and 72 RT cores may still have some life in OpenCL compute workloads that are not fully optimized for Blackwell. Its 24 GB VRAM is double the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile's 12 GB, which matters for very large datasets, though the recorded benchmarks do not show a performance benefit from that capacity. The TITAN also has higher pixel and texture rates, which could theoretically help in rasterization-heavy legacy titles, but the benchmark data shows it still loses in DirectX 9 and 10 tests.

For a new build, the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is the clear winner. For repurposing an existing desktop, the TITAN RTX can still handle OpenCL compute tasks, but its 76th percentile ranking and lower average score make it a dated choice. The practical advice: do not buy a TITAN RTX for modern gaming, and do not expect the mobile part to match the TITAN's VRAM capacity. Choose based on the workload, and the benchmarks say the newer architecture wins almost everywhere.