NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla P4 Comparison

The NVIDIA Tesla P4 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile represent two vastly different eras of GPU design, with the data showing a generational chasm in raw performance. The benchmark results are unambiguous: the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile dominates every single head-to-head test, leaving the older Tesla P4 trailing by significant margins. This analysis will break down the numbers, architectural shifts, and practical implications of choosing between a Pascal-era compute card and a modern Blackwell mobile powerhouse.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head benchmark data paints a stark picture of performance disparity. In the Geekbench OpenCL test, the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile scores 143,870, while the Tesla P4 manages only 34,947. This translates to a deltaPct of -75.7%, meaning the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is roughly four times faster in this compute-heavy workload. The gap is not a minor increment; it is a categorical leap that redefines what is possible on a mobile platform.

The Vulkan results tell a similar story, though with a slightly narrower margin. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile posts 139,213 points, while the Tesla P4 scores 40,309. The deltaPct here is -71%, still a massive advantage for the newer card. Interestingly, the Tesla P4’s Vulkan score (40,309) is actually higher than its OpenCL result (34,947), suggesting that Pascal’s driver overhead or compute scheduling favors Vulkan’s lower-level API. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile, by contrast, shows the opposite trend—its OpenCL score (143,870) edges out Vulkan (139,213)—which may indicate that Blackwell’s compute units are better optimized for OpenCL’s work distribution model.

What is striking is that the Tesla P4’s average benchmark score of 37,628 puts it within 0.1% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070, according to its nearestRivals data. Yet against the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile, it loses by over 70%. This suggests that the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is not merely a step up from the RTX 4070; it is operating in a different performance tier altogether, despite its lower TDP of 60 W compared to the Pascal card’s 75 W.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gulf between these two GPUs is the primary driver of the benchmark results. The Tesla P4 uses the GP104 chip on the Pascal architecture, built on a 16 nm process at TSMC. It packs 7,200 million transistors into a 314 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 22.9M per mm². The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile, in contrast, employs the GB205 chip with Blackwell 2.0 architecture, fabricated on a 5 nm process, also at TSMC. This newer node allows for 31,100 million transistors in a smaller 263 mm² die, achieving a density of 118.3M per mm²—over five times the density of the Pascal chip.

These process and density differences translate directly into compute resources. The Tesla P4 has 2,560 shading units, 160 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, with no dedicated RT or tensor cores. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile more than doubles the shading units to 5,888, while also increasing TMUs to 184 and ROPs to 80. Critically, it adds 46 RT cores and 184 tensor cores, which the Pascal card lacks entirely. This means the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile can handle ray tracing and AI-accelerated workloads natively, while the Tesla P4 would need to rely on compute shaders or external processing.

Memory configurations also diverge sharply. The Tesla P4 uses 8 GB of GDDR5 on a 256-bit bus, providing 192.3 GB/s of bandwidth. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile steps up to 12 GB of GDDR7 on a 192-bit bus, but achieves more than triple the bandwidth at 672.0 GB/s. This bandwidth advantage is crucial for modern workloads that constantly stream large datasets. The clock speeds tell a nuanced story: the Tesla P4 has a higher base clock (886 MHz vs. 847 MHz), but the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has a significantly higher boost clock (1,447 MHz vs. 1,114 MHz), indicating that the Blackwell chip can sustain much higher performance under load.

The FP32 throughput, a key metric for general compute, is 5.704 TFLOPS on the Tesla P4 versus 17.04 TFLOPS on the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile. Even more dramatic is the FP16 performance: the Tesla P4 manages only 89.12 GFLOPS (1:64 ratio), while the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile delivers 17.04 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). This 1:1 FP16 ratio is essential for AI inference and training workloads, making the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile a far more versatile compute device.

Where Each One Wins

Given the benchmark data, the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile wins in every measurable category. It is the clear choice for any workload that demands high compute throughput, such as machine learning inference, 3D rendering, or video processing. The 17.04 TFLOPS FP32 and matching FP16 performance, combined with 672 GB/s of bandwidth, make it suitable for tasks that would choke the Tesla P4’s 5.7 TFLOPS and 192.3 GB/s. The inclusion of RT and tensor cores further extends its utility into ray-traced visualization and AI-accelerated tasks, which are now standard in professional and creative applications.

The Tesla P4, however, still holds relevance in specific niches. Its 75 W TDP and single-slot form factor, with no power connectors required, make it an easy drop-in for legacy servers or compact workstations where power delivery and physical space are constrained. Its PCIe 3.0 x16 interface is older but universally compatible. The data shows it performs near the RTX 4070 in average score (37,628 vs. 37,648), which is remarkable for a 2016-era card. For tasks that are bandwidth-light but require reliable FP32 compute—such as some scientific simulations or older CUDA-optimized code—the Tesla P4 remains a functional, if slow, option.

The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile’s 60 W TDP is actually lower than the Tesla P4’s 75 W, despite delivering roughly four times the performance. This efficiency is a direct result of the 5 nm process and architectural improvements. For mobile or compact deployments, this means the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile can deliver server-class compute without the thermal and power overhead of the older card. The Tesla P4’s only advantage lies in its production status—it is end-of-life, while the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is active—but that is a supply chain consideration, not a performance one.

The Verdict

The data is unequivocal: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is the superior product for virtually any modern workload. Its performance lead is not marginal but transformative, with OpenCL scores 312% higher and Vulkan scores 245% higher than the Tesla P4. The architectural advantages—more shading units, dedicated RT and tensor cores, higher bandwidth, and a denser process node—make it a future-proof investment for compute-heavy tasks. The lower TDP is a bonus, not a compromise.

The Tesla P4, by contrast, belongs in legacy systems or as a low-power compute card for basic tasks. Its end-of-life status and lack of modern features like RT cores or FP16 throughput mean it cannot handle contemporary AI or ray-traced workloads effectively. Its nearest rival, the RTX 4070, scores nearly identically (37,648 vs. 37,628), which suggests that the Tesla P4 is not a bad card for its era—it is simply outclassed by eight years of progress. For anyone building a new system or upgrading, the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is the only rational choice based on benchmark evidence. For those maintaining old infrastructure with minimal compute needs, the Tesla P4 can still serve, but it should not be the default pick.

FAQ

Q: How much faster is the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile in OpenCL compared to the Tesla P4?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile scores 143,870 in Geekbench OpenCL, while the Tesla P4 scores 34,947, resulting in a deltaPct of -75.7% (meaning the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is about four times faster).

Q: Does the Tesla P4 support ray tracing?

A: No. The Tesla P4 has no RT cores listed in its specifications, whereas the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile includes 46 RT cores.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference between the two GPUs?

A: The Tesla P4 offers 192.3 GB/s of bandwidth from 8 GB of GDDR5 on a 256-bit bus, while the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile delivers 672.0 GB/s from 12 GB of GDDR7 on a 192-bit bus.

Q: Which GPU has a higher boost clock speed?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has a boost clock of 1,447 MHz, which is higher than the Tesla P4’s boost clock of 1,114 MHz. The Tesla P4, however, has a slightly higher base clock at 886 MHz versus 847 MHz.

Q: Are there any benchmark tests where the Tesla P4 wins?

A: No. In the head-to-head benchmarks provided (Geekbench OpenCL and Geekbench Vulkan), the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile wins both. The Tesla P4 has zero wins out of two tests.

Q: What is the transistor density difference?

A: The Tesla P4 has a transistor density of 22.9M per mm², while the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile achieves 118.3M per mm², a difference driven by the 16 nm versus 5 nm process nodes.

Specification Differences

| Specification | NVIDIA Tesla P4 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | Pascal | Blackwell 2.0 |

| Process Node | 16 nm | 5 nm |

| Transistors | 7,200 million | 31,100 million |

| Die Size | 314 mm² | 263 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 22.9M / mm² | 118.3M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 886 MHz | 847 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 1114 MHz | 1447 MHz |

| Memory Size | 8 GB | 12 GB |

| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR7 |

| Memory Bus Width | 256 bit | 192 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 192.3 GB/s | 672.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 2560 | 5888 |

| TMUs | 160 | 184 |

| ROPs | 64 | 80 |

| RT Cores | None | 46 |

| Tensor Cores | None | 184 |

| FP32 Performance | 5.704 TFLOPS | 17.04 TFLOPS |

| FP16 Performance | 89.12 GFLOPS (1:64) | 17.04 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 75 W | 60 W |

| Slot Width | Single-slot | IGP |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 5.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | No outputs | Portable Device Dependent |

| DirectX Support | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |

| Production Status | End-of-life | Active |

| Release Date | 2016-09-12 | 2025-02-28 |