NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile vs NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile vs NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The recorded data contains no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile and the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server. Each product is evaluated against entirely different test suites. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has nine recorded benchmark scores spanning Geekbench and Passmark tests, while the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server has a single 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5996.
The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile delivers a Geekbench OpenCL score of 143870 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 139213. Its Passmark G3D score is 24004, with a Passmark GPU Compute score of 10101. The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server's only recorded measurement is the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 result of 5996. Because these tests measure different workloads and use different scoring scales, direct numerical comparison is not meaningful.
The average benchmark score for the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is 35435, placing it in the 80th percentile of all GPUs in the database. The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server has an average benchmark score of 5996, which corresponds to the 34th percentile. This percentile gap indicates that the mobile part performs far better relative to the broader GPU landscape in the recorded tests, but the server part's percentile is based on only one benchmark.
Nearest rival data for the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile shows it sits slightly below the NVIDIA Quadro GV100 (35520 average score, 0.2% lower) and the AMD Radeon Pro Duo (35860, 1.2% lower). It outperforms the NVIDIA A2 (34690, 2.1% higher) and the NVIDIA T1000 (36289, 2.4% lower in the rival's favor). For the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server, the nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M (6000, 0.1% higher), AMD Radeon RX 6400 (6001, 0.1% higher), AMD FirePro W4100 (5987, 0.2% lower), and NVIDIA Quadro K4000M (5986, 0.2% lower). These rival scores are all within a fraction of a percent, meaning the server part's single benchmark result places it in a tightly packed performance cluster.
Architecture Differences
Both GPUs use the Blackwell 2.0 architecture and are fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The core designs diverge substantially. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile uses the GB205 chip with 31,100 million transistors on a 263 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 118.3M per mm². The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server uses the GB202 chip with 92,200 million transistors on a 750 mm² die, giving a density of 122.9M per mm².
The server part has significantly more execution resources. It contains 24064 shading units, 752 TMUs, 192 ROPs, 188 RT cores, and 752 tensor cores. The mobile part has 5888 shading units, 184 TMUs, 80 ROPs, 46 RT cores, and 184 tensor cores. The server GPU therefore has roughly four times the shading units and RT cores, and approximately four times the tensor cores of the mobile GPU.
Clock behavior differs markedly. The mobile GPU runs at a base clock of 847 MHz and a boost clock of 1447 MHz. The server GPU has a base clock of 1590 MHz and a boost clock of 2617 MHz. Memory clock is identical at 1750 MHz, translating to 28 Gbps effective for both.
Memory configurations are vastly different. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has 12 GB of GDDR7 on a 192 bit bus, delivering 672.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server has 96 GB of GDDR7 on a 512 bit bus, delivering 1.79 TB/s. The server part provides eight times the memory capacity and roughly 2.7 times the bandwidth.
The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server draws a TDP of 600 W and uses a 1x 16-pin power connector with a suggested PSU of 1000 W. It is a dual-slot card measuring 267 mm in length, 111 mm in height, and 40 mm in width, with 4x DisplayPort 2.1b outputs. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has a TDP of 60 W, uses no power connectors, has an IGP slot width, and its display outputs are listed as portable device dependent. The mobile part belongs to the GeForce 50 Mobile generation, while the server part belongs to the Server Blackwell (Bxx) generation. Both use PCIe 5.0 x16 and support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.
FAQ
Q: Which GPU has more memory bandwidth?
A: The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server delivers 1.79 TB/s over a 512 bit bus, while the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile delivers 672.0 GB/s over a 192 bit bus.
Q: How do the chip sizes compare?
A: The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server uses a 750 mm² die with 92,200 million transistors. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile uses a 263 mm² die with 31,100 million transistors.
Q: What are the boost clocks of each GPU?
A: The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile boosts to 1447 MHz. The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server boosts to 2617 MHz.
Q: Which GPU has more shading units?
A: The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server has 24064 shading units. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has 5888 shading units.
Q: Do both GPUs support the same APIs?
A: Yes, both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.
Q: What is the power requirement difference?
A: The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has a TDP of 60 W and no power connectors. The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server has a TDP of 600 W, a 1x 16-pin connector, and a suggested PSU of 1000 W.
Specification Differences
| Specification | RTX 5070 Ti Mobile | RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server |
|---|---|---|
| Chip | GB205 | GB202 |
| Generation | GeForce 50 Mobile | Server Blackwell (Bxx) |
| Transistors | 31,100 million | 92,200 million |
| Die Size | 263 mm² | 750 mm² |
| Transistor Density | 118.3M / mm² | 122.9M / mm² |
| Base Clock | 847 MHz | 1590 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1447 MHz | 2617 MHz |
| Memory Size | 12 GB | 96 GB |
| Memory Bus Width | 192 bit | 512 bit |
| Memory Bandwidth | 672.0 GB/s | 1.79 TB/s |
| Shading Units | 5888 | 24064 |
| TMUs | 184 | 752 |
| ROPs | 80 | 192 |
| RT Cores | 46 | 188 |
| Tensor Cores | 184 | 752 |
| Pixel Rate | 115.8 GPixel/s | 502.5 GPixel/s |
| Texture Rate | 266.2 GTexel/s | 1,968.0 GTexel/s |
| FP32 | 17.04 TFLOPS | 126.0 TFLOPS |
| FP16 | 17.04 TFLOPS (1:1) | 126.0 TFLOPS (1:1) |
| TDP | 60 W | 600 W |
| Slot Width | IGP | Dual-slot |
| Power Connectors | None | 1x 16-pin |
| Suggested PSU | Not listed | 1000 W |
| Display Outputs | Portable Device Dependent | 4x DisplayPort 2.1b |
| Dimensions | Not listed | 267 mm x 111 mm x 40 mm |
| Release Date | 2025-02-28 | 2025-03-17 |
| Predecessor | GeForce 40 Mobile | Server Hopper |
| Successor | Not listed | Server Rubin |
The Verdict
The data shows two GPUs with drastically different design targets. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is a low-power integrated mobile part with a 60 W TDP, no power connectors, and an IGP form factor. The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server is a 600 W dual-slot accelerator with a 1x 16-pin connector, a 1000 W suggested PSU, and discrete dimensions. The server part leads in every raw compute specification: FP32 performance is 126.0 TFLOPS versus 17.04 TFLOPS, texture rate is 1,968.0 GTexel/s versus 266.2 GTexel/s, and pixel rate is 502.5 GPixel/s versus 115.8 GPixel/s. It also has 96 GB of memory versus 12 GB, and 24064 shading units versus 5888.
However, the benchmark percentile data tells a different story. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile sits in the 80th percentile of all GPUs, while the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server sits in the 34th percentile. The mobile part's nearest rivals include the Quadro GV100 and Radeon Pro Duo, both high-end workstation parts, and the mobile GPU is within 2.4% of those scores. The server part's nearest rivals are the GTX 770M, RX 6400, FirePro W4100, and Quadro K4000M, all of which are lower-tier or older parts. This indicates that the single recorded 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score for the server GPU does not reflect its theoretical compute advantage, likely because that benchmark does not exercise the full capabilities of a 96 GB, 126.0 TFLOPS accelerator.
The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server is the clear choice for workloads that demand massive memory capacity, extreme FP32 throughput, and high bandwidth. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is the part for constrained power envelopes where integrated graphics are required and where the 80th percentile benchmark standing matters more than raw peak specifications.
Where Each One Wins
The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile wins in the recorded benchmark landscape. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 143870 and Vulkan score of 139213 demonstrate strong general compute and graphics performance for a mobile part. Its Passmark G3D score of 24004 and GPU Compute score of 10101 further support this. The 80th percentile ranking places it well above the server part's 34th percentile. The mobile GPU also wins on power efficiency, drawing 60 W versus 600 W, and on physical flexibility, requiring no power connectors and fitting an IGP slot.
The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server wins on every absolute specification that matters for server acceleration. It provides 96 GB of GDDR7 memory, which is eight times the mobile part's 12 GB. Its 1.79 TB/s bandwidth is nearly three times the 672.0 GB/s of the mobile GPU. The FP32 compute of 126.0 TFLOPS is 7.4 times the 17.04 TFLOPS of the mobile part. The 188 RT cores versus 46, the 752 tensor cores versus 184, and the 24064 shading units versus 5888 all point to a part designed for heavy parallel workloads. The server GPU also has higher clocks, with a 2617 MHz boost versus 1447 MHz, and a larger die with higher transistor density.
The use-case split is defined by these differences. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is suited for portable devices where power draw is limited to 60 W and where the integrated form factor is mandatory. Its benchmark results indicate solid performance in general and graphics workloads. The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server is suited for server installations where the 600 W TDP, 1000 W PSU requirement, and dual-slot footprint are acceptable trade-offs for the massive memory pool, high bandwidth, and peak compute throughput. The server part's release date of 2025-03-17 follows the mobile part's 2025-02-28 release, and its predecessor is Server Hopper while its successor is Server Rubin, indicating a clear server product lineage. The mobile part's predecessor is GeForce 40 Mobile, with no successor listed.